Jule
Last seen for girls in 2021 at #12,206 · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
Given to girls 58.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1891 · 12 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,998since 1886
Jule over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | #9,894 | 7 | |
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | — | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | — | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #11,599 | 9 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #9,539 | 12 | — | |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | — | |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | — | |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | — | |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | — | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | — | |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | — | |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | — | |
| 1991 | — | #8,236 | 5 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | — | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | — | #4,234 | 9 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,509 | 8 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #5,427 | 12 | #4,068 | 9 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | #3,694 | 8 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #3,152 | 10 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #3,521 | 8 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | #2,465 | 11 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | #2,848 | 9 |
| 1961 | #2,673 | 21 | #2,148 | 15 |
| 1960 | #2,307 | 26 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #2,596 | 20 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #2,209 | 26 | #2,370 | 12 |
| 1957 | #2,218 | 25 | #2,494 | 11 |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 | #2,168 | 14 |
| 1955 | #2,063 | 27 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1954 | #2,519 | 19 | #1,668 | 21 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | #1,765 | 19 |
| 1952 | #2,200 | 22 | #2,153 | 13 |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | #2,246 | 12 |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | #2,111 | 13 |
| 1949 | #2,069 | 22 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #1,817 | 17 |
| 1947 | #2,089 | 22 | #2,076 | 14 |
| 1946 | #1,919 | 23 | #1,759 | 17 |
| 1945 | #1,874 | 20 | #1,926 | 13 |
| 1944 | #1,519 | 29 | #1,630 | 18 |
| 1943 | #1,834 | 22 | #1,910 | 15 |
| 1942 | #1,592 | 27 | #1,867 | 15 |
| 1941 | #2,018 | 17 | #1,588 | 19 |
| 1940 | #1,477 | 27 | #2,322 | 10 |
| 1939 | #1,424 | 27 | #1,636 | 17 |
| 1938 | #1,703 | 21 | #1,521 | 20 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 | #1,639 | 17 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 | #1,584 | 19 |
| 1934 | #1,651 | 21 | #1,860 | 15 |
| 1933 | #1,400 | 27 | #1,498 | 21 |
| 1932 | #1,957 | 17 | #1,651 | 19 |
| 1931 | #1,459 | 26 | #1,843 | 16 |
| 1930 | #1,535 | 26 | #1,428 | 26 |
| 1929 | #1,892 | 19 | #1,443 | 25 |
| 1928 | #1,425 | 30 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1927 | #1,559 | 28 | #1,293 | 32 |
| 1926 | #1,388 | 33 | #1,379 | 28 |
| 1925 | #1,324 | 36 | #1,201 | 35 |
| 1924 | #1,354 | 36 | #1,577 | 24 |
| 1923 | #1,388 | 33 | #1,460 | 26 |
| 1922 | #1,611 | 27 | #1,222 | 35 |
| 1921 | #1,341 | 35 | #1,329 | 31 |
| 1920 | #1,206 | 40 | #1,457 | 26 |
| 1919 | #967 | 54 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #1,018 | 50 | #1,256 | 31 |
| 1917 | #952 | 53 | #1,643 | 20 |
| 1916 | #1,026 | 45 | #1,240 | 29 |
| 1915 | #1,025 | 42 | #1,141 | 32 |
| 1914 | #1,344 | 22 | #1,221 | 23 |
| 1913 | #961 | 31 | #1,173 | 19 |
| 1912 | #833 | 36 | #1,223 | 15 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #1,117 | 10 |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | #981 | 11 |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | #1,345 | 5 |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #1,092 | 11 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #1,137 | 10 | — | |
| 1902 | #972 | 13 | #794 | 9 |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #1,431 | 8 | #680 | 14 |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | #857 | 7 |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,094 | 9 | #725 | 9 |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,202 | 8 | #556 | 14 |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | — | #538 | 13 | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #796 | 12 | #597 | 10 |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 | #667 | 9 |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | #789 | 7 |
| 1888 | #1,036 | 7 | #609 | 11 |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | #752 | 7 |
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | #758 | 7 |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #595 | 9 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jule! It came in at #1,108, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1893, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jule
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2021
- Biggest jump: 712 spots in 1912 (#1,545 → #833)
- Biggest drop: 801 spots in 1906 (#926 → #1,727)
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 1891 at #796 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1893, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1912–1913
- Highest: 1 in 15,457 girls born in 1891 were named Jule (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 234,409 girls born in 2021 (0.00%)
- 18.0% of all girls named Jule (359) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2023, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 22 | #1,036 (1888) | #1,143 |
| 1890s | 72 | #796 (1891) | #1,172 |
| 1900s | 110 | #926 (1905) | #1,191 |
| 1910s | 359 | #833 (1912) | #1,078 |
| 1920s | 317 | #1,206 (1920) | #1,449 |
| 1930s | 206 | #1,400 (1933) | #1,784 |
| 1940s | 230 | #1,477 (1940) | #1,852 |
| 1950s | 212 | #2,063 (1955) | #2,388 |
| 1960s | 151 | #2,307 (1960) | #3,620 |
| 1970s | 84 | #4,370 (1975) | #6,632 |
| 1980s | 40 | #5,923 (1987) | #9,584 |
| 1990s | 50 | #9,479 (1999) | #10,751 |
| 2000s | 81 | #8,837 (2002) | #11,137 |
| 2010s | 57 | #10,129 (2014) | #13,063 |
| 2020s | 7 | #12,206 (2021) | #12,206 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jule in 1893
Top boys' names in 1893
More about 1893
boys
112,318 boys got a published name in 1893; 1 in 8,640 of them was named Jule, which outranked 54.4% of the 1,179 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 36.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).