Jule
Last seen for girls in 2021 at #12,206 · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
Given to girls 58.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1891 · 12 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,998since 1886
Jule over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | #9,894 | 7 | |
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | — | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | — | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #12,429 | 8 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #11,599 | 9 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #9,539 | 12 | — | |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | — | |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | — | |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | — | |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | — | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | — | |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | — | |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | — | |
| 1991 | — | #8,236 | 5 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | — | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | — | #4,234 | 9 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,509 | 8 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #5,427 | 12 | #4,068 | 9 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | #3,694 | 8 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #3,152 | 10 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #3,521 | 8 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | #2,465 | 11 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #2,619 | 22 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | #2,848 | 9 |
| 1961 | #2,673 | 21 | #2,148 | 15 |
| 1960 | #2,307 | 26 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #2,596 | 20 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #2,209 | 26 | #2,370 | 12 |
| 1957 | #2,218 | 25 | #2,494 | 11 |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 | #2,168 | 14 |
| 1955 | #2,063 | 27 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1954 | #2,519 | 19 | #1,668 | 21 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | #1,765 | 19 |
| 1952 | #2,200 | 22 | #2,153 | 13 |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | #2,246 | 12 |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | #2,111 | 13 |
| 1949 | #2,069 | 22 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 | #1,817 | 17 |
| 1947 | #2,089 | 22 | #2,076 | 14 |
| 1946 | #1,919 | 23 | #1,759 | 17 |
| 1945 | #1,874 | 20 | #1,926 | 13 |
| 1944 | #1,519 | 29 | #1,630 | 18 |
| 1943 | #1,834 | 22 | #1,910 | 15 |
| 1942 | #1,592 | 27 | #1,867 | 15 |
| 1941 | #2,018 | 17 | #1,588 | 19 |
| 1940 | #1,477 | 27 | #2,322 | 10 |
| 1939 | #1,424 | 27 | #1,636 | 17 |
| 1938 | #1,703 | 21 | #1,521 | 20 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 | #1,639 | 17 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 | #1,584 | 19 |
| 1934 | #1,651 | 21 | #1,860 | 15 |
| 1933 | #1,400 | 27 | #1,498 | 21 |
| 1932 | #1,957 | 17 | #1,651 | 19 |
| 1931 | #1,459 | 26 | #1,843 | 16 |
| 1930 | #1,535 | 26 | #1,428 | 26 |
| 1929 | #1,892 | 19 | #1,443 | 25 |
| 1928 | #1,425 | 30 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1927 | #1,559 | 28 | #1,293 | 32 |
| 1926 | #1,388 | 33 | #1,379 | 28 |
| 1925 | #1,324 | 36 | #1,201 | 35 |
| 1924 | #1,354 | 36 | #1,577 | 24 |
| 1923 | #1,388 | 33 | #1,460 | 26 |
| 1922 | #1,611 | 27 | #1,222 | 35 |
| 1921 | #1,341 | 35 | #1,329 | 31 |
| 1920 | #1,206 | 40 | #1,457 | 26 |
| 1919 | #967 | 54 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #1,018 | 50 | #1,256 | 31 |
| 1917 | #952 | 53 | #1,643 | 20 |
| 1916 | #1,026 | 45 | #1,240 | 29 |
| 1915 | #1,025 | 42 | #1,141 | 32 |
| 1914 | #1,344 | 22 | #1,221 | 23 |
| 1913 | #961 | 31 | #1,173 | 19 |
| 1912 | #833 | 36 | #1,223 | 15 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #1,117 | 10 |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | #981 | 11 |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | #1,345 | 5 |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | #1,092 | 11 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #1,137 | 10 | — | |
| 1902 | #972 | 13 | #794 | 9 |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #1,431 | 8 | #680 | 14 |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | #857 | 7 |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,094 | 9 | #725 | 9 |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,202 | 8 | #556 | 14 |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | — | #538 | 13 | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #796 | 12 | #597 | 10 |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 | #667 | 9 |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | #789 | 7 |
| 1888 | #1,036 | 7 | #609 | 11 |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | #752 | 7 |
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | #758 | 7 |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #595 | 9 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jule! It came in at #1,108, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1893, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jule
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2021
- Biggest jump: 712 spots in 1912 (#1,545 → #833)
- Biggest drop: 801 spots in 1906 (#926 → #1,727)
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 1891 at #796 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1893, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1912–1913
- Highest: 1 in 15,457 girls born in 1891 were named Jule (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 234,409 girls born in 2021 (0.00%)
- 18.0% of all girls named Jule (359) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2023, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 22 | #1,036 (1888) | #1,143 |
| 1890s | 72 | #796 (1891) | #1,172 |
| 1900s | 110 | #926 (1905) | #1,191 |
| 1910s | 359 | #833 (1912) | #1,078 |
| 1920s | 317 | #1,206 (1920) | #1,449 |
| 1930s | 206 | #1,400 (1933) | #1,784 |
| 1940s | 230 | #1,477 (1940) | #1,852 |
| 1950s | 212 | #2,063 (1955) | #2,388 |
| 1960s | 151 | #2,307 (1960) | #3,620 |
| 1970s | 84 | #4,370 (1975) | #6,632 |
| 1980s | 40 | #5,923 (1987) | #9,584 |
| 1990s | 50 | #9,479 (1999) | #10,751 |
| 2000s | 81 | #8,837 (2002) | #11,137 |
| 2010s | 57 | #10,129 (2014) | #13,063 |
| 2020s | 7 | #12,206 (2021) | #12,206 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jule in 1889
Top girls' names in 1889
Top boys' names in 1889
More about 1889
girls
178,366 girls got a published name in 1889; 1 in 35,673 of them was named Jule, which outranked 13.5% of the 1,479 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 200 names at #1,279; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
110,580 boys got a published name in 1889; 1 in 15,797 of them was named Jule, which outranked 29.0% of the 1,111 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 38.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).