Juan
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #13,477 · #159 for boys in 2025, 2,318 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1999 · 7,800 births
- Debut · boys
- 39 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 45 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 365,606since 1880
Juan over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #159 | 2,318 | |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #137 | 2,609 |
| 2023 | — | #140 | 2,539 | |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #141 | 2,679 |
| 2021 | — | #164 | 2,360 | |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #145 | 2,523 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #138 | 2,704 |
| 2018 | — | #139 | 2,844 | |
| 2017 | — | #137 | 2,997 | |
| 2016 | — | #122 | 3,349 | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | #114 | 3,525 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #100 | 3,903 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #100 | 3,892 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #92 | 4,284 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #89 | 4,684 |
| 2010 | — | #76 | 5,245 | |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #67 | 6,283 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 | #66 | 7,034 |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | #63 | 7,422 |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | #61 | 7,940 |
| 2005 | #4,958 | 26 | #55 | 8,231 |
| 2004 | #3,989 | 35 | #54 | 8,134 |
| 2003 | #5,795 | 20 | #55 | 7,831 |
| 2002 | #4,621 | 26 | #54 | 7,820 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | #53 | 7,447 |
| 2000 | #3,664 | 35 | #48 | 7,712 |
| 1999 | #3,374 | 37 | #46 | 7,800 |
| 1998 | #4,796 | 22 | #52 | 7,361 |
| 1997 | #4,819 | 21 | #54 | 7,115 |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 | #52 | 7,010 |
| 1995 | #3,357 | 33 | #50 | 6,982 |
| 1994 | #2,701 | 45 | #51 | 7,208 |
| 1993 | #2,451 | 51 | #55 | 6,901 |
| 1992 | #2,351 | 55 | #56 | 6,956 |
| 1991 | #2,420 | 52 | #60 | 6,843 |
| 1990 | #2,153 | 60 | #61 | 6,743 |
| 1989 | #2,714 | 41 | #63 | 5,781 |
| 1988 | #2,330 | 47 | #68 | 5,171 |
| 1987 | #2,434 | 42 | #66 | 4,976 |
| 1986 | #2,170 | 48 | #65 | 5,076 |
| 1985 | #1,760 | 64 | #65 | 4,851 |
| 1984 | #2,149 | 46 | #64 | 4,644 |
| 1983 | #1,585 | 70 | #62 | 4,894 |
| 1982 | #1,922 | 55 | #61 | 5,121 |
| 1981 | #2,061 | 50 | #60 | 5,499 |
| 1980 | #1,657 | 69 | #59 | 5,434 |
| 1979 | #1,645 | 68 | #61 | 4,946 |
| 1978 | #2,092 | 45 | #62 | 4,837 |
| 1977 | #1,621 | 65 | #63 | 4,562 |
| 1976 | #1,602 | 62 | #58 | 5,053 |
| 1975 | #1,527 | 66 | #60 | 4,695 |
| 1974 | #1,913 | 45 | #64 | 4,428 |
| 1973 | #1,732 | 51 | #67 | 4,087 |
| 1972 | #1,674 | 53 | #73 | 3,672 |
| 1971 | #2,542 | 29 | #81 | 3,648 |
| 1970 | #2,938 | 23 | #95 | 3,476 |
| 1969 | #2,585 | 26 | #104 | 3,024 |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 | #112 | 2,622 |
| 1967 | #2,376 | 26 | #121 | 2,474 |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | #129 | 2,383 |
| 1965 | #2,464 | 24 | #140 | 2,199 |
| 1964 | #2,306 | 28 | #148 | 2,227 |
| 1963 | #2,211 | 29 | #147 | 2,250 |
| 1962 | #2,414 | 25 | #153 | 2,150 |
| 1961 | #2,197 | 29 | #160 | 2,052 |
| 1960 | #2,097 | 30 | #160 | 2,076 |
| 1959 | #2,054 | 30 | #164 | 1,920 |
| 1958 | #2,073 | 29 | #162 | 1,939 |
| 1957 | #2,563 | 20 | #165 | 1,902 |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | #169 | 1,756 |
| 1955 | #3,095 | 14 | #161 | 1,771 |
| 1954 | #2,076 | 26 | #153 | 1,870 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | #149 | 1,894 |
| 1952 | #2,126 | 23 | #150 | 1,856 |
| 1951 | #1,805 | 29 | #144 | 1,838 |
| 1950 | #2,002 | 23 | #133 | 2,025 |
| 1949 | #1,967 | 24 | #145 | 1,834 |
| 1948 | #2,828 | 13 | #164 | 1,475 |
| 1947 | #1,722 | 31 | #172 | 1,314 |
| 1946 | #2,153 | 19 | #172 | 1,128 |
| 1945 | #2,060 | 17 | #166 | 1,013 |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 | #179 | 902 |
| 1943 | #2,079 | 18 | #192 | 835 |
| 1942 | #2,214 | 16 | #209 | 718 |
| 1941 | #1,810 | 20 | #206 | 661 |
| 1940 | #1,965 | 17 | #196 | 677 |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 | #199 | 625 |
| 1938 | #2,113 | 15 | #201 | 639 |
| 1937 | #1,630 | 22 | #209 | 573 |
| 1936 | #2,386 | 12 | #207 | 579 |
| 1935 | #2,006 | 16 | #200 | 628 |
| 1934 | #3,159 | 8 | #196 | 636 |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 | #191 | 629 |
| 1932 | #1,568 | 24 | #195 | 654 |
| 1931 | #1,803 | 19 | #180 | 744 |
| 1930 | #1,748 | 21 | #164 | 907 |
| 1929 | #1,766 | 21 | #164 | 875 |
| 1928 | #1,784 | 22 | #170 | 858 |
| 1927 | #2,699 | 12 | #191 | 759 |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 | #210 | 648 |
| 1925 | #2,119 | 18 | #194 | 718 |
| 1924 | #2,212 | 17 | #190 | 740 |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 | #205 | 645 |
| 1922 | #3,152 | 10 | #212 | 620 |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #234 | 571 |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 | #213 | 605 |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #230 | 524 |
| 1918 | — | #253 | 436 | |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 | #251 | 407 |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | #277 | 338 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #259 | 348 |
| 1914 | — | #247 | 299 | |
| 1913 | — | #240 | 243 | |
| 1912 | — | #238 | 217 | |
| 1911 | — | #202 | 151 | |
| 1910 | — | #183 | 150 | |
| 1909 | — | #183 | 123 | |
| 1908 | — | #200 | 101 | |
| 1907 | — | #179 | 121 | |
| 1906 | — | #200 | 88 | |
| 1905 | — | #190 | 93 | |
| 1904 | — | #202 | 81 | |
| 1903 | — | #206 | 75 | |
| 1902 | — | #217 | 68 | |
| 1901 | — | #187 | 78 | |
| 1900 | — | #215 | 84 | |
| 1899 | — | #216 | 60 | |
| 1898 | — | #239 | 53 | |
| 1897 | — | #238 | 53 | |
| 1896 | — | #224 | 63 | |
| 1895 | — | #223 | 61 | |
| 1894 | — | #240 | 50 | |
| 1893 | — | #241 | 51 | |
| 1892 | — | #239 | 55 | |
| 1891 | — | #245 | 42 | |
| 1890 | — | #236 | 50 | |
| 1889 | — | #208 | 61 | |
| 1888 | — | #234 | 56 | |
| 1887 | — | #203 | 57 | |
| 1886 | — | #194 | 69 | |
| 1885 | — | #220 | 54 | |
| 1884 | — | #221 | 56 | |
| 1883 | — | #215 | 50 | |
| 1882 | — | #273 | 39 | |
| 1881 | — | #224 | 45 | |
| 1880 | — | #270 | 39 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Juan was already there! It came in at #270, and was given to 39 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 57 boys a year got the name.
See more about Juan
- 22 spots since 2024 (#137 → #159)
- 14 spots since 2020 (#145 → #159)
- 45 spots since 2015 (#114 → #159)
- Biggest jump: 58 spots in 1883 (#273 → #215)
- Biggest drop: 49 spots in 1882 (#224 → #273)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1999 at #46 (7,800 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 45 yrs · run 1970–2014
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 243 boys born in 2005 were named Juan (0.41%)
- Latest: 1 in 737 boys born in 2025 (0.14%)
- Its best rank, #46 in 1999, was only 1 in 246 (0.41%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 20.7% of all boys named Juan (75,854) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 526 | #194 (1886) | #226 |
| 1890s | 538 | #216 (1899) | #234 |
| 1900s | 912 | #179 (1907) | #198 |
| 1910s | 3,113 | #183 (1910) | #238 |
| 1920s | 7,039 | #164 (1929) | #198 |
| 1930s | 6,614 | #164 (1930) | #194 |
| 1940s | 10,557 | #145 (1949) | #180 |
| 1950s | 18,771 | #133 (1950) | #155 |
| 1960s | 23,457 | #104 (1969) | #137 |
| 1970s | 43,404 | #58 (1976) | #68 |
| 1980s | 51,447 | #59 (1980) | #63 |
| 1990s | 70,919 | #46 (1999) | #54 |
| 2000s | 75,854 | #48 (2000) | #58 |
| 2010s | 37,427 | #76 (2010) | #111 |
| 2020s | 15,028 | #137 (2024) | #148 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juan in 1951
Top girls' names in 1951
Top boys' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 62,099 of them was named Juan, which outranked 70.9% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,772Valinda30
- #1,772Velinda30
- #1,772Veta30
- #1,805Juan29
- #1,805Alesia29
- #1,805Bella29
- #1,805Bernie29
- #1,842Annice28
- #1,842Arthur28
- #1,842Athena28
Tied with 36 names at #1,805; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,882,837 boys got a published name in 1951; 1 in 1,024 of them was named Juan, which outranked 96.6% of the 4,253 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.