Jonnie
#6,838 for girls in 2025, 16 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #10,803
Given to girls 64.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1944 · 119 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,880since 1881
Jonnie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,838 | 16 | — | |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | — | |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | — | |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | — | |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | — | |
| 2019 | #6,414 | 18 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #7,100 | 16 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #7,230 | 16 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #6,676 | 12 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #7,537 | 10 |
| 2012 | #7,144 | 17 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | — | |
| 2010 | #7,217 | 17 | #7,087 | 11 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #5,795 | 20 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #5,424 | 19 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #4,142 | 27 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #3,723 | 29 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #3,152 | 36 | #3,191 | 21 |
| 1994 | #3,302 | 34 | #4,537 | 13 |
| 1993 | #3,422 | 32 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #2,974 | 39 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #3,540 | 30 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #3,227 | 34 | #4,407 | 12 |
| 1989 | #3,673 | 27 | #4,271 | 12 |
| 1988 | #3,483 | 27 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #2,572 | 39 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #3,645 | 23 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #3,730 | 22 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #3,726 | 21 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | #2,595 | 34 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #3,344 | 25 | #3,966 | 10 |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | #3,601 | 11 |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #3,357 | 12 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #2,669 | 16 |
| 1977 | #2,606 | 32 | #2,791 | 15 |
| 1976 | #2,292 | 36 | #2,826 | 14 |
| 1975 | #2,680 | 28 | #2,288 | 19 |
| 1974 | #2,290 | 34 | #2,050 | 21 |
| 1973 | #2,405 | 31 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #2,903 | 23 | #1,819 | 24 |
| 1971 | #1,730 | 52 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #2,203 | 36 | #1,658 | 27 |
| 1969 | #1,711 | 50 | #1,861 | 20 |
| 1968 | #1,909 | 39 | #1,393 | 31 |
| 1967 | #1,881 | 39 | #1,449 | 28 |
| 1966 | #1,715 | 43 | #1,450 | 28 |
| 1965 | #1,575 | 50 | #1,856 | 18 |
| 1964 | #1,559 | 53 | #1,384 | 32 |
| 1963 | #1,683 | 46 | #1,338 | 34 |
| 1962 | #1,444 | 59 | #1,230 | 40 |
| 1961 | #1,435 | 60 | #1,570 | 26 |
| 1960 | #1,366 | 65 | #1,167 | 45 |
| 1959 | #1,192 | 80 | #1,416 | 31 |
| 1958 | #1,417 | 56 | #1,277 | 36 |
| 1957 | #1,193 | 78 | #1,267 | 38 |
| 1956 | #1,076 | 91 | #1,157 | 43 |
| 1955 | #1,043 | 93 | #1,313 | 33 |
| 1954 | #1,064 | 85 | #1,268 | 35 |
| 1953 | #1,103 | 77 | #1,331 | 32 |
| 1952 | #1,039 | 82 | #939 | 57 |
| 1951 | #902 | 102 | #1,195 | 37 |
| 1950 | #814 | 115 | #1,022 | 47 |
| 1949 | #835 | 111 | #1,205 | 35 |
| 1948 | #821 | 112 | #1,047 | 45 |
| 1947 | #734 | 136 | #1,014 | 50 |
| 1946 | #761 | 116 | #897 | 54 |
| 1945 | #755 | 99 | #943 | 47 |
| 1944 | #685 | 119 | #949 | 46 |
| 1943 | #721 | 114 | #1,074 | 40 |
| 1942 | #804 | 90 | #991 | 45 |
| 1941 | #790 | 83 | #938 | 46 |
| 1940 | #780 | 82 | #1,067 | 37 |
| 1939 | #752 | 83 | #846 | 52 |
| 1938 | #811 | 75 | #992 | 41 |
| 1937 | #891 | 60 | #1,148 | 33 |
| 1936 | #768 | 77 | #924 | 44 |
| 1935 | #751 | 81 | #940 | 45 |
| 1934 | #768 | 76 | #869 | 52 |
| 1933 | #858 | 61 | #946 | 44 |
| 1932 | #891 | 62 | #1,090 | 38 |
| 1931 | #857 | 65 | #997 | 44 |
| 1930 | #786 | 80 | #1,007 | 46 |
| 1929 | #814 | 75 | #952 | 50 |
| 1928 | #759 | 88 | #835 | 62 |
| 1927 | #824 | 79 | #849 | 63 |
| 1926 | #843 | 76 | #855 | 60 |
| 1925 | #849 | 77 | #1,332 | 30 |
| 1924 | #903 | 70 | #925 | 57 |
| 1923 | #811 | 81 | #961 | 51 |
| 1922 | #835 | 77 | #949 | 54 |
| 1921 | #848 | 76 | #1,058 | 44 |
| 1920 | #774 | 88 | #903 | 58 |
| 1919 | #967 | 54 | #753 | 73 |
| 1918 | #825 | 75 | #851 | 60 |
| 1917 | #986 | 50 | #884 | 52 |
| 1916 | #993 | 48 | #922 | 47 |
| 1915 | #934 | 50 | #1,082 | 35 |
| 1914 | #1,023 | 34 | #1,073 | 28 |
| 1913 | #981 | 30 | #871 | 31 |
| 1912 | #1,080 | 23 | #755 | 33 |
| 1911 | #958 | 21 | #624 | 24 |
| 1910 | #831 | 27 | #755 | 16 |
| 1909 | #868 | 22 | #1,020 | 9 |
| 1908 | #849 | 21 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | #923 | 17 | #699 | 14 |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | #927 | 8 |
| 1905 | #1,057 | 13 | #1,002 | 7 |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | #587 | 15 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 | #527 | 17 |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | #651 | 12 |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | #727 | 9 |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | #649 | 15 |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | #786 | 8 |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | #1,121 | 5 |
| 1897 | #931 | 12 | #942 | 6 |
| 1896 | #843 | 15 | #1,101 | 5 |
| 1895 | #1,299 | 7 | #738 | 9 |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #567 | 13 |
| 1893 | — | #1,035 | 5 | |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,006 | 8 | #766 | 7 |
| 1890 | #1,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | — | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #740 | 6 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jonnie! It came in at #740, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jonnie is popular in 1950
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#353 · 1 in 3,093
- Arkansas#414 · 1 in 4,268
- Mississippi#448 · 1 in 4,723
- Tennessee#509 · 1 in 7,340
- Missouri#528 · 1 in 7,872
Best ever in a state: #252 in South Carolina, 1940.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #353 | 7 | 1 in 3,093 |
| Arkansas | #414 | 5 | 1 in 4,268 |
| Mississippi | #448 | 6 | 1 in 4,723 |
| Tennessee | #509 | 5 | 1 in 7,340 |
| Missouri | #528 | 5 | 1 in 7,872 |
| Texas | #560 | 17 | 1 in 5,630 |
| North Carolina | #590 | 5 | 1 in 9,654 |
| Ohio | #669 | 6 | 1 in 14,190 |
| Michigan | #702 | 5 | 1 in 14,640 |
| Illinois | #801 | 5 | 1 in 17,394 |
| California | #1,097 | 5 | 1 in 22,707 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jonnie
- 413 spots since 2024 (#7,251 → #6,838)
- 2,708 spots since 2020 (#9,546 → #6,838)
- 802 spots since 2015 (#6,036 → #6,838)
- Biggest jump: 630 spots in 1907 (#1,553 → #923)
- Biggest drop: 398 spots in 1901 (#941 → #1,339)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1944 at #685 (119 births)
- Births halved by 1958, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1915–1951
- Highest: 1 in 11,153 girls born in 1944 were named Jonnie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 100,454 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 18.1% of all girls named Jonnie (1,062) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1972, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 23 | #740 (1881) | #995 |
| 1890s | 85 | #843 (1896) | #1,069 |
| 1900s | 133 | #849 (1908) | #1,107 |
| 1910s | 412 | #825 (1918) | #958 |
| 1920s | 787 | #759 (1928) | #826 |
| 1930s | 720 | #751 (1935) | #813 |
| 1940s | 1,062 | #685 (1944) | #769 |
| 1950s | 859 | #814 (1950) | #1,084 |
| 1960s | 504 | #1,366 (1960) | #1,628 |
| 1970s | 327 | #1,730 (1971) | #2,541 |
| 1980s | 286 | #2,529 (1981) | #3,216 |
| 1990s | 300 | #2,974 (1992) | #3,792 |
| 2000s | 159 | #5,795 (2003) | #7,356 |
| 2010s | 148 | #6,036 (2015) | #8,236 |
| 2020s | 75 | #6,838 (2025) | #8,515 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jonnie in 1950
Top girls' names in 1950
Top boys' names in 1950
More about 1950
girls
1,713,054 girls got a published name in 1950; 1 in 14,896 of them was named Jonnie, which outranked 86.7% of the 6,109 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,790,262 boys got a published name in 1950; 1 in 38,091 of them was named Jonnie, which outranked 75.6% of the 4,196 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,006Romeo48
- #1,006Rudolfo48
- #1,006Tillman48
- #1,022Jonnie47
- #1,022Arlan47
- #1,022Arvin47
- #1,022Aurelio47
- #1,037Abe46
- #1,037Cory46
- #1,037Eliseo46
Tied with 14 names at #1,022; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.