Jonnie
#6,838 for girls in 2025, 16 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #10,803
Given to girls 64.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1944 · 119 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,880since 1881
Jonnie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,838 | 16 | — | |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 | — | |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | — | |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | — | |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | — | |
| 2019 | #6,414 | 18 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #7,100 | 16 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #7,230 | 16 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #6,676 | 12 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #7,537 | 10 |
| 2012 | #7,144 | 17 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | — | |
| 2010 | #7,217 | 17 | #7,087 | 11 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #5,969 | 20 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #5,795 | 20 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #5,424 | 19 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #4,142 | 27 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #3,723 | 29 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #3,152 | 36 | #3,191 | 21 |
| 1994 | #3,302 | 34 | #4,537 | 13 |
| 1993 | #3,422 | 32 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #2,974 | 39 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #3,540 | 30 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #3,227 | 34 | #4,407 | 12 |
| 1989 | #3,673 | 27 | #4,271 | 12 |
| 1988 | #3,483 | 27 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #2,572 | 39 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #3,645 | 23 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #3,730 | 22 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #3,726 | 21 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | #2,595 | 34 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #3,344 | 25 | #3,966 | 10 |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | #3,601 | 11 |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #3,357 | 12 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #2,669 | 16 |
| 1977 | #2,606 | 32 | #2,791 | 15 |
| 1976 | #2,292 | 36 | #2,826 | 14 |
| 1975 | #2,680 | 28 | #2,288 | 19 |
| 1974 | #2,290 | 34 | #2,050 | 21 |
| 1973 | #2,405 | 31 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #2,903 | 23 | #1,819 | 24 |
| 1971 | #1,730 | 52 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #2,203 | 36 | #1,658 | 27 |
| 1969 | #1,711 | 50 | #1,861 | 20 |
| 1968 | #1,909 | 39 | #1,393 | 31 |
| 1967 | #1,881 | 39 | #1,449 | 28 |
| 1966 | #1,715 | 43 | #1,450 | 28 |
| 1965 | #1,575 | 50 | #1,856 | 18 |
| 1964 | #1,559 | 53 | #1,384 | 32 |
| 1963 | #1,683 | 46 | #1,338 | 34 |
| 1962 | #1,444 | 59 | #1,230 | 40 |
| 1961 | #1,435 | 60 | #1,570 | 26 |
| 1960 | #1,366 | 65 | #1,167 | 45 |
| 1959 | #1,192 | 80 | #1,416 | 31 |
| 1958 | #1,417 | 56 | #1,277 | 36 |
| 1957 | #1,193 | 78 | #1,267 | 38 |
| 1956 | #1,076 | 91 | #1,157 | 43 |
| 1955 | #1,043 | 93 | #1,313 | 33 |
| 1954 | #1,064 | 85 | #1,268 | 35 |
| 1953 | #1,103 | 77 | #1,331 | 32 |
| 1952 | #1,039 | 82 | #939 | 57 |
| 1951 | #902 | 102 | #1,195 | 37 |
| 1950 | #814 | 115 | #1,022 | 47 |
| 1949 | #835 | 111 | #1,205 | 35 |
| 1948 | #821 | 112 | #1,047 | 45 |
| 1947 | #734 | 136 | #1,014 | 50 |
| 1946 | #761 | 116 | #897 | 54 |
| 1945 | #755 | 99 | #943 | 47 |
| 1944 | #685 | 119 | #949 | 46 |
| 1943 | #721 | 114 | #1,074 | 40 |
| 1942 | #804 | 90 | #991 | 45 |
| 1941 | #790 | 83 | #938 | 46 |
| 1940 | #780 | 82 | #1,067 | 37 |
| 1939 | #752 | 83 | #846 | 52 |
| 1938 | #811 | 75 | #992 | 41 |
| 1937 | #891 | 60 | #1,148 | 33 |
| 1936 | #768 | 77 | #924 | 44 |
| 1935 | #751 | 81 | #940 | 45 |
| 1934 | #768 | 76 | #869 | 52 |
| 1933 | #858 | 61 | #946 | 44 |
| 1932 | #891 | 62 | #1,090 | 38 |
| 1931 | #857 | 65 | #997 | 44 |
| 1930 | #786 | 80 | #1,007 | 46 |
| 1929 | #814 | 75 | #952 | 50 |
| 1928 | #759 | 88 | #835 | 62 |
| 1927 | #824 | 79 | #849 | 63 |
| 1926 | #843 | 76 | #855 | 60 |
| 1925 | #849 | 77 | #1,332 | 30 |
| 1924 | #903 | 70 | #925 | 57 |
| 1923 | #811 | 81 | #961 | 51 |
| 1922 | #835 | 77 | #949 | 54 |
| 1921 | #848 | 76 | #1,058 | 44 |
| 1920 | #774 | 88 | #903 | 58 |
| 1919 | #967 | 54 | #753 | 73 |
| 1918 | #825 | 75 | #851 | 60 |
| 1917 | #986 | 50 | #884 | 52 |
| 1916 | #993 | 48 | #922 | 47 |
| 1915 | #934 | 50 | #1,082 | 35 |
| 1914 | #1,023 | 34 | #1,073 | 28 |
| 1913 | #981 | 30 | #871 | 31 |
| 1912 | #1,080 | 23 | #755 | 33 |
| 1911 | #958 | 21 | #624 | 24 |
| 1910 | #831 | 27 | #755 | 16 |
| 1909 | #868 | 22 | #1,020 | 9 |
| 1908 | #849 | 21 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | #923 | 17 | #699 | 14 |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | #927 | 8 |
| 1905 | #1,057 | 13 | #1,002 | 7 |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | #587 | 15 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 | #527 | 17 |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | #651 | 12 |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | #727 | 9 |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | #649 | 15 |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | #786 | 8 |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | #1,121 | 5 |
| 1897 | #931 | 12 | #942 | 6 |
| 1896 | #843 | 15 | #1,101 | 5 |
| 1895 | #1,299 | 7 | #738 | 9 |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #567 | 13 |
| 1893 | — | #1,035 | 5 | |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,006 | 8 | #766 | 7 |
| 1890 | #1,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | — | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #740 | 6 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jonnie! It came in at #740, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jonnie is popular in 1892
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Jonnie
- 413 spots since 2024 (#7,251 → #6,838)
- 2,708 spots since 2020 (#9,546 → #6,838)
- 802 spots since 2015 (#6,036 → #6,838)
- Biggest jump: 630 spots in 1907 (#1,553 → #923)
- Biggest drop: 398 spots in 1901 (#941 → #1,339)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1944 at #685 (119 births)
- Births halved by 1958, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1915–1951
- Highest: 1 in 11,153 girls born in 1944 were named Jonnie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 100,454 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 18.1% of all girls named Jonnie (1,062) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1972, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 23 | #740 (1881) | #995 |
| 1890s | 85 | #843 (1896) | #1,069 |
| 1900s | 133 | #849 (1908) | #1,107 |
| 1910s | 412 | #825 (1918) | #958 |
| 1920s | 787 | #759 (1928) | #826 |
| 1930s | 720 | #751 (1935) | #813 |
| 1940s | 1,062 | #685 (1944) | #769 |
| 1950s | 859 | #814 (1950) | #1,084 |
| 1960s | 504 | #1,366 (1960) | #1,628 |
| 1970s | 327 | #1,730 (1971) | #2,541 |
| 1980s | 286 | #2,529 (1981) | #3,216 |
| 1990s | 300 | #2,974 (1992) | #3,792 |
| 2000s | 159 | #5,795 (2003) | #7,356 |
| 2010s | 148 | #6,036 (2015) | #8,236 |
| 2020s | 75 | #6,838 (2025) | #8,515 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jonnie in 1892
Top girls' names in 1892
More about 1892
girls
212,339 girls got a published name in 1892; 1 in 17,695 of them was named Jonnie, which outranked 48.2% of the 1,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).