Jodeci
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · #7,194 for boys in 2025, 11 births
Given to boys 52.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1992 · 94 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 455since 1991
Jodeci over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | #7,194 | 11 |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #6,199 | 14 |
| 2023 | #10,312 | 9 | #6,517 | 13 |
| 2022 | #7,631 | 14 | #4,442 | 23 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | #5,338 | 17 |
| 2020 | #11,090 | 8 | #5,451 | 16 |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | #4,480 | 22 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #7,617 | 10 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | — | #6,349 | 13 | |
| 2015 | — | #7,491 | 10 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | — | #7,026 | 11 | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | — | #8,803 | 8 | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | — | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 | #6,042 | 10 |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | #6,843 | 8 |
| 1997 | #6,163 | 15 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #3,723 | 29 | #4,613 | 13 |
| 1995 | #3,422 | 32 | #4,052 | 15 |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | #3,030 | 23 |
| 1993 | #3,351 | 33 | #2,509 | 29 |
| 1992 | #1,844 | 77 | #1,135 | 94 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five boys were named Jodeci! It came in at #4,476, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2001–2002, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Jodeci
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 995 spots since 2024 (#6,199 → #7,194)
- 1,743 spots since 2020 (#5,451 → #7,194)
- 297 spots since 2015 (#7,491 → #7,194)
Rise & fade · boys
1 yr to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 1992 at #1,135 (94 births)
- Births halved by 1993, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 21,249
- Highest: 1 in 21,249 boys born in 1992 were named Jodeci (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 155,280 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 46.8% of all boys named Jodeci (213) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2018
- Mostly girls until 2017, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 213 | #1,135 (1992) | #4,311 |
| 2000s | 40 | #7,998 (2006) | #9,387 |
| 2010s | 108 | #4,480 (2019) | #7,673 |
| 2020s | 94 | #4,442 (2022) | #5,857 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jodeci ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: