Jettie
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · Last seen for boys in 1979 at #6,056
Given to girls 94.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1888 · 29 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,665since 1880
Jettie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | — | |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | — | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | — | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #10,148 | 10 | — | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | — | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | — | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,427 | 12 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | — | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,460 | 14 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,512 | 23 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,033 | 15 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,411 | 21 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #2,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,301 | 21 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,892 | 28 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,611 | 35 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,495 | 38 | #2,770 | 8 |
| 1949 | #2,212 | 20 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,422 | 42 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,377 | 45 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,318 | 43 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,153 | 46 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,206 | 45 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,300 | 38 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,206 | 39 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #1,097 | 43 | #2,478 | 9 |
| 1939 | #1,009 | 49 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #1,018 | 49 | — | |
| 1937 | #950 | 53 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #901 | 57 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #912 | 57 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #1,019 | 46 | #2,973 | 7 |
| 1933 | #999 | 48 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #869 | 64 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #857 | 65 | — | |
| 1930 | #926 | 62 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #954 | 61 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #863 | 73 | — | |
| 1926 | #990 | 57 | — | |
| 1925 | #837 | 79 | — | |
| 1924 | #853 | 77 | #3,260 | 8 |
| 1923 | #774 | 89 | — | |
| 1922 | #803 | 82 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #813 | 81 | #2,986 | 9 |
| 1920 | #797 | 82 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #843 | 68 | #3,736 | 6 |
| 1918 | #711 | 103 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #797 | 75 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #848 | 64 | #2,543 | 10 |
| 1915 | #752 | 77 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #692 | 69 | — | |
| 1913 | #721 | 52 | #1,803 | 10 |
| 1912 | #833 | 36 | — | |
| 1911 | #594 | 51 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #679 | 39 | — | |
| 1909 | #669 | 35 | — | |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 | — | |
| 1907 | #601 | 38 | — | |
| 1906 | #578 | 37 | — | |
| 1905 | #570 | 37 | — | |
| 1904 | #537 | 38 | — | |
| 1903 | #539 | 36 | — | |
| 1902 | #612 | 29 | — | |
| 1901 | #603 | 27 | — | |
| 1900 | #543 | 39 | — | |
| 1899 | #537 | 31 | — | |
| 1898 | #581 | 31 | — | |
| 1897 | #537 | 30 | — | |
| 1896 | #576 | 28 | — | |
| 1895 | #480 | 37 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #597 | 24 | — | |
| 1893 | #535 | 27 | — | |
| 1892 | #666 | 19 | — | |
| 1891 | #497 | 27 | — | |
| 1890 | #642 | 17 | — | |
| 1889 | #468 | 28 | — | |
| 1888 | #458 | 29 | — | |
| 1887 | #499 | 20 | — | |
| 1886 | #476 | 21 | — | |
| 1885 | #695 | 10 | — | |
| 1884 | #520 | 16 | — | |
| 1883 | #536 | 13 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | #580 | 9 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jettie was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jettie
- 3,370 spots since 2024 (#13,477 → #10,107)
- 4,981 spots since 2020 (#15,088 → #10,107)
- 41 spots since 2015 (#10,148 → #10,107)
- Biggest jump: 219 spots in 1886 (#695 → #476)
- Biggest drop: 239 spots in 1912 (#594 → #833)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1888 at #458 (29 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 73 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1880–1933
- Highest: 1 in 6,159 girls born in 1888 were named Jettie (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 178,585 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.1% of all girls named Jettie (738) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 169 | #458 (1888) | #533 |
| 1890s | 271 | #480 (1895) | #565 |
| 1900s | 341 | #537 (1904) | #602 |
| 1910s | 634 | #594 (1911) | #747 |
| 1920s | 738 | #774 (1923) | #864 |
| 1930s | 550 | #857 (1931) | #946 |
| 1940s | 390 | #1,097 (1940) | #1,381 |
| 1950s | 234 | #1,495 (1950) | #2,331 |
| 1960s | 110 | #2,512 (1960) | #4,047 |
| 1970s | 63 | #5,427 (1979) | #7,380 |
| 1980s | 47 | #6,291 (1984) | #9,177 |
| 1990s | 24 | #10,193 (1990) | #12,008 |
| 2000s | 6 | #13,521 (2001) | #13,521 |
| 2010s | 48 | #10,148 (2015) | #14,753 |
| 2020s | 40 | #10,107 (2025) | #12,816 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jettie in 1929
Top girls' names in 1929
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 19,589 of them was named Jettie, which outranked 82.0% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 215,123 of them was named Jettie, which outranked 12.9% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 586 names at #3,959; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.