Jettie
#10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births · Last seen for boys in 1979 at #6,056
Given to girls 94.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1888 · 29 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,665since 1880
Jettie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | — | |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | — | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | — | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #10,148 | 10 | — | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | — | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | — | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,427 | 12 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | — | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,460 | 14 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,512 | 23 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,033 | 15 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,411 | 21 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #2,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,301 | 21 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,892 | 28 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,611 | 35 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,495 | 38 | #2,770 | 8 |
| 1949 | #2,212 | 20 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,422 | 42 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,377 | 45 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,318 | 43 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,153 | 46 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,206 | 45 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,300 | 38 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,206 | 39 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #1,097 | 43 | #2,478 | 9 |
| 1939 | #1,009 | 49 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #1,018 | 49 | — | |
| 1937 | #950 | 53 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #901 | 57 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #912 | 57 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #1,019 | 46 | #2,973 | 7 |
| 1933 | #999 | 48 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #869 | 64 | #2,849 | 8 |
| 1931 | #857 | 65 | — | |
| 1930 | #926 | 62 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #954 | 61 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #863 | 73 | — | |
| 1926 | #990 | 57 | — | |
| 1925 | #837 | 79 | — | |
| 1924 | #853 | 77 | #3,260 | 8 |
| 1923 | #774 | 89 | — | |
| 1922 | #803 | 82 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #813 | 81 | #2,986 | 9 |
| 1920 | #797 | 82 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #843 | 68 | #3,736 | 6 |
| 1918 | #711 | 103 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #797 | 75 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #848 | 64 | #2,543 | 10 |
| 1915 | #752 | 77 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #692 | 69 | — | |
| 1913 | #721 | 52 | #1,803 | 10 |
| 1912 | #833 | 36 | — | |
| 1911 | #594 | 51 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #679 | 39 | — | |
| 1909 | #669 | 35 | — | |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 | — | |
| 1907 | #601 | 38 | — | |
| 1906 | #578 | 37 | — | |
| 1905 | #570 | 37 | — | |
| 1904 | #537 | 38 | — | |
| 1903 | #539 | 36 | — | |
| 1902 | #612 | 29 | — | |
| 1901 | #603 | 27 | — | |
| 1900 | #543 | 39 | — | |
| 1899 | #537 | 31 | — | |
| 1898 | #581 | 31 | — | |
| 1897 | #537 | 30 | — | |
| 1896 | #576 | 28 | — | |
| 1895 | #480 | 37 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #597 | 24 | — | |
| 1893 | #535 | 27 | — | |
| 1892 | #666 | 19 | — | |
| 1891 | #497 | 27 | — | |
| 1890 | #642 | 17 | — | |
| 1889 | #468 | 28 | — | |
| 1888 | #458 | 29 | — | |
| 1887 | #499 | 20 | — | |
| 1886 | #476 | 21 | — | |
| 1885 | #695 | 10 | — | |
| 1884 | #520 | 16 | — | |
| 1883 | #536 | 13 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | #580 | 9 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jettie was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jettie
- 3,370 spots since 2024 (#13,477 → #10,107)
- 4,981 spots since 2020 (#15,088 → #10,107)
- 41 spots since 2015 (#10,148 → #10,107)
- Biggest jump: 219 spots in 1886 (#695 → #476)
- Biggest drop: 239 spots in 1912 (#594 → #833)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1888 at #458 (29 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 73 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1880–1933
- Highest: 1 in 6,159 girls born in 1888 were named Jettie (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 178,585 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 20.1% of all girls named Jettie (738) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 169 | #458 (1888) | #533 |
| 1890s | 271 | #480 (1895) | #565 |
| 1900s | 341 | #537 (1904) | #602 |
| 1910s | 634 | #594 (1911) | #747 |
| 1920s | 738 | #774 (1923) | #864 |
| 1930s | 550 | #857 (1931) | #946 |
| 1940s | 390 | #1,097 (1940) | #1,381 |
| 1950s | 234 | #1,495 (1950) | #2,331 |
| 1960s | 110 | #2,512 (1960) | #4,047 |
| 1970s | 63 | #5,427 (1979) | #7,380 |
| 1980s | 47 | #6,291 (1984) | #9,177 |
| 1990s | 24 | #10,193 (1990) | #12,008 |
| 2000s | 6 | #13,521 (2001) | #13,521 |
| 2010s | 48 | #10,148 (2015) | #14,753 |
| 2020s | 40 | #10,107 (2025) | #12,816 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jettie in 1909
Top girls' names in 1909
More about 1909
girls
347,228 girls got a published name in 1909; 1 in 9,921 of them was named Jettie, which outranked 73.7% of the 2,548 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #662Lupe36
- #662Macie36
- #662Norine36
- #669Jettie35
- #669Antonette35
- #669Beverly35
- #669Celestine35
- #684Arvilla34
- #684Clifford34
- #684Justine34
Tied with 14 names at #669; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.