Jayme
#7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births · #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
Given to girls 78.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1985 · 597 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,071since 1938
Jayme over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,491 | 14 | #6,143 | 14 |
| 2024 | #5,443 | 23 | #5,067 | 19 |
| 2023 | #5,752 | 21 | #4,456 | 23 |
| 2022 | #4,793 | 28 | #3,879 | 28 |
| 2021 | #4,167 | 34 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #4,169 | 33 | #4,141 | 24 |
| 2019 | #4,773 | 28 | #5,340 | 17 |
| 2018 | #3,346 | 47 | #5,106 | 18 |
| 2017 | #3,091 | 52 | #4,746 | 20 |
| 2016 | #2,412 | 77 | #3,990 | 26 |
| 2015 | #2,964 | 58 | #4,711 | 20 |
| 2014 | #2,648 | 66 | #4,538 | 21 |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | #3,964 | 25 |
| 2012 | #2,373 | 78 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #2,326 | 80 | #3,885 | 26 |
| 2010 | #2,059 | 96 | #2,914 | 40 |
| 2009 | #1,727 | 127 | #3,162 | 36 |
| 2008 | #1,642 | 137 | #2,632 | 47 |
| 2007 | #1,453 | 161 | #2,564 | 48 |
| 2006 | #1,505 | 146 | #2,784 | 41 |
| 2005 | #1,547 | 132 | #3,091 | 33 |
| 2004 | #1,290 | 166 | #2,887 | 35 |
| 2003 | #1,235 | 170 | #2,153 | 51 |
| 2002 | #1,338 | 145 | #2,046 | 53 |
| 2001 | #1,102 | 192 | #2,386 | 41 |
| 2000 | #1,139 | 179 | #2,425 | 39 |
| 1999 | #1,058 | 191 | #1,879 | 52 |
| 1998 | #975 | 207 | #1,987 | 48 |
| 1997 | #914 | 219 | #2,024 | 44 |
| 1996 | #786 | 264 | #1,705 | 55 |
| 1995 | #782 | 254 | #1,706 | 52 |
| 1994 | #711 | 293 | #1,312 | 79 |
| 1993 | #749 | 277 | #1,577 | 57 |
| 1992 | #687 | 315 | #1,301 | 75 |
| 1991 | #630 | 356 | #1,063 | 104 |
| 1990 | #595 | 381 | #1,072 | 98 |
| 1989 | #606 | 352 | #1,002 | 104 |
| 1988 | #562 | 379 | #994 | 95 |
| 1987 | #487 | 444 | #954 | 97 |
| 1986 | #484 | 444 | #965 | 90 |
| 1985 | #382 | 597 | #910 | 99 |
| 1984 | #468 | 446 | #1,084 | 68 |
| 1983 | #443 | 464 | #1,049 | 71 |
| 1982 | #432 | 506 | #920 | 94 |
| 1981 | #447 | 480 | #900 | 98 |
| 1980 | #436 | 493 | #905 | 98 |
| 1979 | #516 | 381 | #937 | 88 |
| 1978 | #448 | 443 | #847 | 102 |
| 1977 | #454 | 436 | #773 | 121 |
| 1976 | #419 | 480 | #744 | 125 |
| 1975 | #702 | 211 | #800 | 108 |
| 1974 | #839 | 157 | #793 | 102 |
| 1973 | #980 | 121 | #874 | 83 |
| 1972 | #996 | 119 | #900 | 79 |
| 1971 | #917 | 142 | #998 | 66 |
| 1970 | #894 | 147 | #940 | 72 |
| 1969 | #970 | 122 | #1,097 | 50 |
| 1968 | #1,056 | 99 | #1,339 | 33 |
| 1967 | #1,086 | 92 | #1,312 | 33 |
| 1966 | #1,135 | 87 | #1,450 | 28 |
| 1965 | #1,129 | 88 | #1,206 | 40 |
| 1964 | #1,073 | 103 | #1,311 | 36 |
| 1963 | #940 | 126 | #1,354 | 33 |
| 1962 | #1,001 | 115 | #1,069 | 51 |
| 1961 | #1,253 | 78 | #1,322 | 36 |
| 1960 | #1,138 | 91 | #1,295 | 37 |
| 1959 | #1,135 | 88 | #1,360 | 33 |
| 1958 | #1,129 | 88 | #1,186 | 42 |
| 1957 | #1,055 | 97 | #1,511 | 27 |
| 1956 | #1,204 | 75 | #1,765 | 20 |
| 1955 | #1,175 | 72 | #1,646 | 22 |
| 1954 | #1,241 | 64 | #1,762 | 19 |
| 1953 | #1,586 | 38 | #2,531 | 10 |
| 1952 | #1,713 | 33 | #2,514 | 10 |
| 1951 | #1,555 | 37 | — | |
| 1950 | #3,052 | 12 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #2,514 | 16 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #2,416 | 17 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,919 | 23 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,249 | 9 | — | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jayme! It came in at #4,342, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1938–1942, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jayme
- 2,048 spots since 2024 (#5,443 → #7,491)
- 3,322 spots since 2020 (#4,169 → #7,491)
- 4,527 spots since 2015 (#2,964 → #7,491)
- Biggest jump: 283 spots in 1976 (#702 → #419)
- Biggest drop: 133 spots in 1964 (#940 → #1,073)
- Debuted 1938
- Peaked 1985 at #382 (597 births)
- Births halved by 1993, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1969–1998
- Highest: 1 in 2,882 girls born in 1985 were named Jayme (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 114,805 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 32.7% of all girls named Jayme (4,605) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2023, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | #4,342 (1938) | #4,342 |
| 1940s | 102 | #1,919 (1946) | #3,055 |
| 1950s | 604 | #1,055 (1957) | #1,485 |
| 1960s | 1,001 | #940 (1963) | #1,078 |
| 1970s | 2,637 | #419 (1976) | #717 |
| 1980s | 4,605 | #382 (1985) | #475 |
| 1990s | 2,757 | #595 (1990) | #789 |
| 2000s | 1,555 | #1,102 (2001) | #1,398 |
| 2010s | 652 | #2,059 (2010) | #2,853 |
| 2020s | 153 | #4,167 (2021) | #5,303 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jayme in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 13,999 of them was named Jayme, which outranked 91.9% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,539Roxanna133
- #1,539Samia133
- #1,539Sunny133
- #1,547Jayme132
- #1,547Ariadna132
- #1,547Gracelynn132
- #1,547Kailynn132
- #1,553Brynlee131
- #1,553Carys131
- #1,553Chesney131
Tied with 5 names at #1,547; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 60,524 of them was named Jayme, which outranked 76.9% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,022Yariel34
- #3,022Yitzchak34
- #3,022Zavien34
- #3,091Jayme33
- #3,091Aaden33
- #3,091Aakash33
- #3,091Amogh33
- #3,172Amadeus32
- #3,172Andrez32
- #3,172Anthonie32
Tied with 80 names at #3,091; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.