Jaylene
#1,359 for girls in 2025, 162 births · Last seen for boys in 2007 at #10,921
Given to girls 99.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 448 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 10,133since 1938
Jaylene over time
Rank among girls' names. Jaylene has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,359 | 162 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,207 | 196 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,186 | 202 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,206 | 200 | — | |
| 2021 | #975 | 266 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,042 | 241 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,025 | 251 | — | |
| 2018 | #877 | 308 | — | |
| 2017 | #808 | 338 | — | |
| 2016 | #741 | 384 | — | |
| 2015 | #711 | 401 | — | |
| 2014 | #790 | 355 | — | |
| 2013 | #719 | 383 | — | |
| 2012 | #692 | 406 | — | |
| 2011 | #636 | 448 | — | |
| 2010 | #653 | 449 | — | |
| 2009 | #653 | 453 | — | |
| 2008 | #638 | 483 | — | |
| 2007 | #748 | 390 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #910 | 290 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #792 | 328 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #771 | 335 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #859 | 281 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #946 | 236 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #1,054 | 203 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,091 | 189 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #921 | 229 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #1,063 | 184 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,225 | 146 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | #1,780 | 83 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #2,125 | 63 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,585 | 48 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,380 | 53 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #2,869 | 41 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,207 | 34 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,737 | 42 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,121 | 23 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,700 | 39 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,723 | 36 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,682 | 36 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,730 | 22 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,233 | 26 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,721 | 32 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,614 | 35 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,134 | 27 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,903 | 19 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,388 | 22 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,812 | 17 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,811 | 26 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,110 | 22 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,747 | 25 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,955 | 23 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,705 | 26 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,350 | 30 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,538 | 24 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,558 | 23 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,345 | 26 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,011 | 35 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,543 | 23 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,889 | 37 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,197 | 29 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,061 | 31 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,596 | 20 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,581 | 20 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,168 | 26 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,725 | 17 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,482 | 10 | — | |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | — | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,491 | 16 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | — | |
| 1944 | #3,687 | 7 | — | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jaylene! It came in at #3,450, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1939–1943, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jaylene
- 152 spots since 2024 (#1,207 → #1,359)
- 317 spots since 2020 (#1,042 → #1,359)
- 648 spots since 2015 (#711 → #1,359)
- Biggest jump: 162 spots in 2007 (#910 → #748)
- Biggest drop: 231 spots in 2022 (#975 → #1,206)
- Debuted 1938
- Peaked 2011 at #636 (448 births)
- Births halved by 2022, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 2002–2018
- Highest: 1 in 3,915 girls born in 2008 were named Jaylene (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,921 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #636 in 2011, was only 1 in 3,926 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 36.7% of all girls named Jaylene (3,723) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 7 | #3,450 (1938) | #3,450 |
| 1940s | 55 | #2,491 (1948) | #3,960 |
| 1950s | 169 | #2,168 (1957) | #2,968 |
| 1960s | 279 | #1,889 (1962) | #2,316 |
| 1970s | 219 | #2,705 (1970) | #3,240 |
| 1980s | 303 | #2,614 (1981) | #3,083 |
| 1990s | 923 | #921 (1999) | #2,089 |
| 2000s | 3,188 | #638 (2008) | #846 |
| 2010s | 3,723 | #636 (2011) | #765 |
| 2020s | 1,267 | #975 (2021) | #1,163 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaylene in 2018
Top girls' names in 2018
More about 2018
girls
1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 5,523 of them was named Jaylene, which outranked 95.2% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).