Jayce
#4,460 for girls in 2025, 31 births · #167 for boys in 2025, 2,199 births
Given to boys 96.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2015 · 3,127 births
- Debut · boys
- 13 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 45,423since 1956
Jayce over time
Rank among boys' names. Jayce has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,460 | 31 | #167 | 2,199 |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 | #168 | 2,184 |
| 2023 | #4,047 | 36 | #166 | 2,179 |
| 2022 | #4,295 | 33 | #154 | 2,429 |
| 2021 | #3,735 | 40 | #158 | 2,421 |
| 2020 | #3,778 | 38 | #150 | 2,467 |
| 2019 | #3,002 | 54 | #148 | 2,634 |
| 2018 | #2,782 | 61 | #147 | 2,659 |
| 2017 | #2,597 | 67 | #139 | 2,917 |
| 2016 | #2,168 | 89 | #138 | 2,972 |
| 2015 | #2,736 | 64 | #132 | 3,127 |
| 2014 | #2,560 | 69 | #150 | 2,718 |
| 2013 | #2,279 | 81 | #147 | 2,673 |
| 2012 | #2,568 | 70 | #200 | 1,919 |
| 2011 | #2,945 | 58 | #223 | 1,604 |
| 2010 | #3,816 | 40 | #298 | 1,097 |
| 2009 | #3,161 | 53 | #355 | 873 |
| 2008 | #2,855 | 62 | #383 | 800 |
| 2007 | #3,096 | 56 | #409 | 712 |
| 2006 | #2,887 | 60 | #428 | 657 |
| 2005 | #2,969 | 54 | #456 | 560 |
| 2004 | #3,333 | 45 | #521 | 460 |
| 2003 | #2,800 | 55 | #536 | 432 |
| 2002 | #2,642 | 58 | #541 | 409 |
| 2001 | #3,091 | 45 | #617 | 308 |
| 2000 | #3,404 | 39 | #604 | 321 |
| 1999 | #2,854 | 47 | #763 | 209 |
| 1998 | #3,015 | 42 | #878 | 165 |
| 1997 | #3,224 | 36 | #981 | 132 |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 | #926 | 141 |
| 1995 | #4,217 | 24 | #1,137 | 101 |
| 1994 | #4,521 | 22 | #1,254 | 86 |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | #1,379 | 70 |
| 1992 | #4,236 | 24 | #1,197 | 87 |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | #1,368 | 68 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #1,662 | 49 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #1,492 | 55 |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #1,618 | 44 |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #1,030 | 85 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #694 | 171 |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #1,614 | 39 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | — | #2,912 | 15 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,897 | 15 |
| 1978 | — | #4,157 | 8 | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | — | #4,418 | 7 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,941 | 8 | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #3,318 | 10 |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,318 | 7 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,305 | 7 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,652 | 6 | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #2,177 | 14 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,993 | 5 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,263 | 13 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | #4,047 | 6 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jayce! It came in at #2,263, and was given to 13 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1959–1960, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Jayce
- 1 spot since 2024 (#168 → #167)
- 17 spots since 2020 (#150 → #167)
- 35 spots since 2015 (#132 → #167)
- Biggest jump: 920 spots in 1986 (#1,614 → #694)
- Biggest drop: 336 spots in 1987 (#694 → #1,030)
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 2015 at #132 (3,127 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 31 yrs · run 1996–2025
- Highest: 1 in 613 boys born in 2015 were named Jayce (0.16%)
- Latest: 1 in 777 boys born in 2025 (0.13%)
- 53.5% of all boys named Jayce (24,320) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 32 | #2,177 (1958) | #2,811 |
| 1960s | 32 | #3,305 (1962) | #3,487 |
| 1970s | 66 | #2,897 (1979) | #4,060 |
| 1980s | 454 | #694 (1986) | #2,538 |
| 1990s | 1,108 | #763 (1999) | #1,155 |
| 2000s | 5,532 | #355 (2009) | #485 |
| 2010s | 24,320 | #132 (2015) | #172 |
| 2020s | 13,879 | #150 (2020) | #161 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jayce in 1956
Top boys' names in 1956
More about 1956
boys
2,115,302 boys got a published name in 1956; 1 in 162,716 of them was named Jayce, which outranked 49.2% of the 4,455 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,168Winifred14
- #2,168Zackary14
- #2,168Zebedee14
- #2,263Jayce13
- #2,263Alois13
- #2,263Anita13
- #2,263Antonia13
- #2,361Adonis12
- #2,361Adron12
- #2,361Alston12
Tied with 97 names at #2,263; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.