Jarrett
Last seen for girls in 2002 at #15,432 · #2,390 for boys in 2025, 57 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1998 · 1,020 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 22,892since 1880
Jarrett over time
Rank among boys' names. Jarrett has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,390 | 57 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,169 | 67 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,147 | 67 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,907 | 82 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,823 | 85 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,518 | 110 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,347 | 133 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,553 | 108 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,287 | 141 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,366 | 130 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,139 | 166 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,040 | 193 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,243 | 142 | |
| 2012 | — | #993 | 200 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,031 | 184 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,092 | 176 | |
| 2009 | — | #912 | 226 | |
| 2008 | — | #894 | 233 | |
| 2007 | — | #714 | 323 | |
| 2006 | — | #663 | 345 | |
| 2005 | — | #579 | 398 | |
| 2004 | — | #517 | 464 | |
| 2003 | — | #416 | 616 | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #375 | 699 |
| 2001 | — | #337 | 820 | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #299 | 1,005 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #301 | 955 |
| 1998 | — | #282 | 1,020 | |
| 1997 | — | #305 | 889 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #372 | 636 |
| 1995 | — | #410 | 559 | |
| 1994 | — | #407 | 562 | |
| 1993 | — | #382 | 601 | |
| 1992 | — | #445 | 495 | |
| 1991 | — | #399 | 570 | |
| 1990 | — | #380 | 609 | |
| 1989 | — | #356 | 637 | |
| 1988 | — | #374 | 539 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #356 | 548 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #357 | 530 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #376 | 481 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #403 | 413 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #385 | 434 |
| 1982 | — | #382 | 450 | |
| 1981 | — | #361 | 487 | |
| 1980 | — | #409 | 395 | |
| 1979 | — | #421 | 360 | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #439 | 330 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #500 | 267 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #496 | 258 |
| 1975 | — | #523 | 237 | |
| 1974 | — | #503 | 250 | |
| 1973 | — | #484 | 262 | |
| 1972 | — | #588 | 184 | |
| 1971 | — | #579 | 199 | |
| 1970 | — | #609 | 179 | |
| 1969 | — | #592 | 173 | |
| 1968 | — | #669 | 125 | |
| 1967 | — | #782 | 87 | |
| 1966 | — | #875 | 69 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,294 | 35 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,384 | 32 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,744 | 21 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,423 | 30 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,602 | 25 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,812 | 20 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,865 | 19 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,506 | 11 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,887 | 18 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,608 | 24 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,572 | 24 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,525 | 25 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,427 | 28 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,297 | 33 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,643 | 21 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,499 | 24 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,348 | 29 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,559 | 22 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,449 | 26 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,557 | 21 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,494 | 20 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,483 | 21 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,461 | 23 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,682 | 18 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,633 | 18 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,081 | 12 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,578 | 18 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,084 | 12 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,528 | 20 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,872 | 14 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,396 | 10 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,393 | 10 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,542 | 9 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,328 | 11 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,444 | 11 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,317 | 12 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,843 | 9 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,193 | 14 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,725 | 10 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,089 | 15 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,229 | 14 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,446 | 12 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,143 | 15 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,489 | 7 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,265 | 13 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,217 | 7 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,310 | 11 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,496 | 6 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #809 | 6 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jarrett was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1883, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jarrett is popular in 1999
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Delaware#116 · 1 in 500
- West Virginia#138 · 1 in 738
- Alabama#167 · 1 in 891
- Wisconsin#171 · 1 in 945
- Indiana#172 · 1 in 873
Best ever in a state: #116 in Delaware, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #116 | 8 | 1 in 500 |
| West Virginia | #138 | 12 | 1 in 738 |
| Alabama | #167 | 28 | 1 in 891 |
| Wisconsin | #171 | 31 | 1 in 945 |
| Indiana | #172 | 44 | 1 in 873 |
| Ohio | #190 | 57 | 1 in 1,217 |
| Pennsylvania | #199 | 53 | 1 in 1,246 |
| Georgia | #213 | 46 | 1 in 1,170 |
| North Carolina | #213 | 41 | 1 in 1,200 |
| Tennessee | #213 | 29 | 1 in 1,247 |
| Kentucky | #215 | 17 | 1 in 1,380 |
| Michigan | #224 | 42 | 1 in 1,401 |
| Kansas | #230 | 14 | 1 in 1,158 |
| Connecticut | #245 | 10 | 1 in 1,822 |
| Florida | #245 | 59 | 1 in 1,472 |
| Maryland | #247 | 19 | 1 in 1,494 |
| Iowa | #253 | 10 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Nebraska | #258 | 7 | 1 in 1,434 |
| New York | #263 | 68 | 1 in 1,673 |
| Mississippi | #266 | 11 | 1 in 1,383 |
| Oklahoma | #284 | 13 | 1 in 1,556 |
| Illinois | #287 | 46 | 1 in 1,735 |
| Minnesota | #297 | 13 | 1 in 2,236 |
| New Jersey | #301 | 21 | 1 in 2,259 |
| South Carolina | #305 | 11 | 1 in 1,869 |
| Missouri | #312 | 15 | 1 in 2,276 |
| Virginia | #321 | 18 | 1 in 2,214 |
| Arkansas | #341 | 7 | 1 in 2,051 |
| Massachusetts | #364 | 10 | 1 in 3,628 |
| Texas | #370 | 67 | 1 in 2,457 |
| Nevada | #379 | 5 | 1 in 2,356 |
| Utah | #397 | 8 | 1 in 2,576 |
| Oregon | #432 | 6 | 1 in 3,300 |
| Arizona | #468 | 10 | 1 in 3,619 |
| Washington | #483 | 9 | 1 in 3,839 |
| California | #524 | 45 | 1 in 5,373 |
| Colorado | #542 | 6 | 1 in 4,548 |
| Louisiana | #577 | 7 | 1 in 3,904 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jarrett
- 221 spots since 2024 (#2,169 → #2,390)
- 872 spots since 2020 (#1,518 → #2,390)
- 1,251 spots since 2015 (#1,139 → #2,390)
- Biggest jump: 419 spots in 1966 (#1,294 → #875)
- Biggest drop: 250 spots in 2013 (#993 → #1,243)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1998 at #282 (1,020 births)
- Births halved by 2004, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 48 yrs · run 1966–2009
- Highest: 1 in 1,874 boys born in 1998 were named Jarrett (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 29,966 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 30.1% of all boys named Jarrett (6,896) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 12 | #809 (1880) | #829 |
| 1890s | 6 | #928 (1899) | #928 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 65 | #2,101 (1914) | #2,575 |
| 1920s | 123 | #2,089 (1925) | #2,463 |
| 1930s | 126 | #1,528 (1937) | #2,148 |
| 1940s | 210 | #1,348 (1949) | #1,575 |
| 1950s | 227 | #1,297 (1952) | #1,683 |
| 1960s | 617 | #592 (1969) | #1,218 |
| 1970s | 2,526 | #421 (1979) | #514 |
| 1980s | 4,914 | #356 (1989) | #376 |
| 1990s | 6,896 | #282 (1998) | #368 |
| 2000s | 5,129 | #299 (2000) | #571 |
| 2010s | 1,573 | #993 (2012) | #1,209 |
| 2020s | 468 | #1,518 (2020) | #1,992 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jarrett in 1999
Top girls' names in 1999
Top boys' names in 1999
More about 1999
girls
1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 295,637 of them was named Jarrett, which outranked 25.1% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #11,385Zosia7
- #11,385Zujey7
- #11,385Zuzanna7
- #12,688Jarrett6
- #12,688Aalia6
- #12,688Aaliyan6
- #12,688Aaniya6
- #14,411Aalijah5
- #14,411Aania5
- #14,411Aanya5
Tied with 1,722 names at #12,688; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,920,150 boys got a published name in 1999; 1 in 2,011 of them was named Jarrett, which outranked 97.4% of the 11,614 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 14.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).