Jaqueline
#2,607 for girls in 2025, 66 births · Last seen for boys in 2002 at #10,667
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2000 · 1,200 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 15,508since 1923
Jaqueline over time
Rank among girls' names. Jaqueline has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,607 | 66 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,585 | 68 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,588 | 68 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,490 | 72 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,638 | 65 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,468 | 70 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,035 | 94 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,159 | 87 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,889 | 107 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,684 | 127 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,566 | 140 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,306 | 182 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,148 | 209 | — | |
| 2012 | #907 | 288 | — | |
| 2011 | #768 | 355 | — | |
| 2010 | #700 | 407 | — | |
| 2009 | #701 | 415 | — | |
| 2008 | #617 | 496 | — | |
| 2007 | #510 | 626 | — | |
| 2006 | #512 | 592 | — | |
| 2005 | #525 | 556 | — | |
| 2004 | #515 | 556 | — | |
| 2003 | #468 | 637 | — | |
| 2002 | #437 | 664 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #369 | 806 | — | |
| 2000 | #268 | 1,200 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #404 | 688 | — | |
| 1998 | #694 | 325 | — | |
| 1997 | #649 | 340 | — | |
| 1996 | #581 | 394 | — | |
| 1995 | #657 | 325 | — | |
| 1994 | #696 | 301 | — | |
| 1993 | #817 | 245 | — | |
| 1992 | #810 | 248 | — | |
| 1991 | #781 | 263 | — | |
| 1990 | #789 | 255 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #844 | 221 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #852 | 210 | — | |
| 1987 | #974 | 162 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,013 | 151 | — | |
| 1985 | #987 | 154 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,040 | 136 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,150 | 115 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,152 | 122 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,189 | 111 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,227 | 107 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,530 | 76 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,511 | 74 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,596 | 67 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,406 | 75 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,439 | 72 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,448 | 69 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,478 | 64 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,627 | 55 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,534 | 64 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,599 | 59 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,440 | 66 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,451 | 61 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,428 | 60 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,515 | 54 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,302 | 69 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,265 | 76 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,392 | 64 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,651 | 47 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,742 | 43 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,196 | 28 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,449 | 22 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,779 | 16 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,516 | 18 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,040 | 13 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,850 | 13 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,339 | 14 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,558 | 13 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,572 | 11 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,570 | 11 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,521 | 11 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 | — | |
| 1934 | #3,449 | 7 | — | |
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,831 | 10 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,552 | 12 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,046 | 10 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,939 | 11 | — | |
| 1924 | #3,393 | 9 | — | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 | — | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jaqueline! It came in at #3,971, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1933–1934, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaqueline is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#194 · 1 in 694
- District of Columbia#199 · 1 in 627
- Nevada#242 · 1 in 892
- Texas#264 · 1 in 1,235
- Colorado#336 · 1 in 1,454
Best ever in a state: #73 in New Mexico, 2000.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #194 | 12 | 1 in 694 |
| District of Columbia | #199 | 5 | 1 in 627 |
| Nevada | #242 | 13 | 1 in 892 |
| Texas | #264 | 130 | 1 in 1,235 |
| Colorado | #336 | 17 | 1 in 1,454 |
| California | #342 | 135 | 1 in 1,707 |
| Illinois | #396 | 33 | 1 in 2,035 |
| Arizona | #408 | 19 | 1 in 1,870 |
| Georgia | #453 | 23 | 1 in 2,235 |
| Oklahoma | #478 | 8 | 1 in 2,084 |
| North Carolina | #492 | 18 | 1 in 2,522 |
| Washington | #508 | 12 | 1 in 2,446 |
| Oregon | #536 | 6 | 1 in 2,650 |
| Arkansas | #553 | 5 | 1 in 2,461 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,753 |
| Wisconsin | #625 | 7 | 1 in 3,578 |
| Utah | #686 | 5 | 1 in 3,680 |
| Missouri | #690 | 7 | 1 in 4,144 |
| Florida | #700 | 20 | 1 in 4,285 |
| Virginia | #706 | 9 | 1 in 4,123 |
| Indiana | #733 | 7 | 1 in 4,644 |
| New York | #827 | 18 | 1 in 5,282 |
| Tennessee | #964 | 5 | 1 in 6,215 |
| Michigan | #1,246 | 5 | 1 in 9,471 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaqueline
- 22 spots since 2024 (#2,585 → #2,607)
- 139 spots since 2020 (#2,468 → #2,607)
- 1,041 spots since 2015 (#1,566 → #2,607)
- Biggest jump: 290 spots in 1999 (#694 → #404)
- Biggest drop: 241 spots in 2013 (#907 → #1,148)
- Debuted 1923
- Peaked 2000 at #268 (1,200 births)
- Births halved by 2004, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1987–2012
- Highest: 1 in 1,513 girls born in 2000 were named Jaqueline (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 24,353 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.2% of all girls named Jaqueline (6,548) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 61 | #2,939 (1925) | #3,419 |
| 1930s | 101 | #2,206 (1939) | #2,866 |
| 1940s | 119 | #2,339 (1945) | #2,793 |
| 1950s | 158 | #2,449 (1958) | #2,898 |
| 1960s | 568 | #1,265 (1964) | #1,538 |
| 1970s | 675 | #1,406 (1976) | #1,517 |
| 1980s | 1,489 | #844 (1989) | #1,043 |
| 1990s | 3,384 | #404 (1999) | #688 |
| 2000s | 6,548 | #268 (2000) | #492 |
| 2010s | 1,996 | #700 (2010) | #1,416 |
| 2020s | 409 | #2,468 (2020) | #2,563 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaqueline in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 3,323 of them was named Jaqueline, which outranked 97.3% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.