Janice
#2,514 for girls in 2025, 70 births · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #7,270
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1951 · 15,958 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 36 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 406,448since 1894
Janice over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,514 | 70 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,248 | 83 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,002 | 98 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,123 | 90 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,154 | 87 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,959 | 97 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,528 | 141 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,435 | 154 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,495 | 148 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,406 | 165 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,238 | 198 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,326 | 178 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,264 | 188 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,257 | 192 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,244 | 192 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,051 | 236 | — | |
| 2009 | #842 | 331 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,030 | 254 | — | |
| 2007 | #947 | 286 | — | |
| 2006 | #996 | 260 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,021 | 238 | — | |
| 2004 | #861 | 285 | — | |
| 2003 | #954 | 245 | — | |
| 2002 | #746 | 325 | — | |
| 2001 | #837 | 273 | — | |
| 2000 | #743 | 310 | — | |
| 1999 | #750 | 298 | — | |
| 1998 | #711 | 311 | — | |
| 1997 | #691 | 311 | — | |
| 1996 | #657 | 338 | — | |
| 1995 | #613 | 362 | — | |
| 1994 | #561 | 420 | — | |
| 1993 | #532 | 450 | — | |
| 1992 | #514 | 462 | — | |
| 1991 | #491 | 485 | — | |
| 1990 | #476 | 514 | — | |
| 1989 | #445 | 546 | — | |
| 1988 | #380 | 631 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #355 | 669 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #361 | 657 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #342 | 688 | #4,698 | 8 |
| 1984 | #313 | 758 | — | |
| 1983 | #301 | 772 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #276 | 880 | — | |
| 1981 | #277 | 890 | — | |
| 1980 | #257 | 1,004 | — | |
| 1979 | #240 | 1,078 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #216 | 1,162 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #215 | 1,143 | — | |
| 1976 | #213 | 1,155 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #191 | 1,310 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #193 | 1,323 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #183 | 1,474 | #3,013 | 11 |
| 1972 | #171 | 1,713 | #2,534 | 14 |
| 1971 | #151 | 2,144 | #2,464 | 15 |
| 1970 | #145 | 2,331 | #2,509 | 14 |
| 1969 | #131 | 2,631 | #3,062 | 9 |
| 1968 | #110 | 3,043 | #2,576 | 11 |
| 1967 | #99 | 3,514 | #2,611 | 10 |
| 1966 | #80 | 4,345 | #2,216 | 13 |
| 1965 | #73 | 5,029 | #1,806 | 19 |
| 1964 | #69 | 6,161 | #1,510 | 27 |
| 1963 | #63 | 7,074 | #1,513 | 27 |
| 1962 | #58 | 7,822 | #1,625 | 24 |
| 1961 | #52 | 8,727 | #1,406 | 32 |
| 1960 | #41 | 9,620 | #1,167 | 45 |
| 1959 | #37 | 10,489 | #1,522 | 27 |
| 1958 | #35 | 10,888 | #1,483 | 28 |
| 1957 | #32 | 11,968 | #1,583 | 25 |
| 1956 | #26 | 13,017 | #1,385 | 31 |
| 1955 | #25 | 13,178 | #1,240 | 37 |
| 1954 | #25 | 13,505 | #1,525 | 25 |
| 1953 | #22 | 14,627 | #1,592 | 23 |
| 1952 | #23 | 14,978 | #1,856 | 17 |
| 1951 | #21 | 15,958 | #1,553 | 23 |
| 1950 | #22 | 15,012 | #1,464 | 25 |
| 1949 | #24 | 14,453 | #1,754 | 18 |
| 1948 | #23 | 14,162 | #1,296 | 31 |
| 1947 | #22 | 15,409 | #1,297 | 32 |
| 1946 | #22 | 14,039 | #1,278 | 30 |
| 1945 | #24 | 10,781 | #1,406 | 22 |
| 1944 | #28 | 9,733 | #1,173 | 32 |
| 1943 | #26 | 10,651 | #1,088 | 39 |
| 1942 | #25 | 10,286 | #991 | 45 |
| 1941 | #22 | 10,061 | #1,051 | 38 |
| 1940 | #22 | 9,318 | #929 | 47 |
| 1939 | #24 | 8,778 | #1,052 | 37 |
| 1938 | #24 | 8,711 | #1,062 | 37 |
| 1937 | #25 | 7,768 | #1,119 | 34 |
| 1936 | #31 | 6,150 | #1,384 | 23 |
| 1935 | #47 | 4,442 | #1,584 | 19 |
| 1934 | #68 | 3,588 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #81 | 3,061 | #2,738 | 8 |
| 1932 | #94 | 2,628 | #1,922 | 15 |
| 1931 | #104 | 2,287 | #2,328 | 11 |
| 1930 | #126 | 1,930 | #2,609 | 10 |
| 1929 | #136 | 1,690 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #149 | 1,565 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #159 | 1,468 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #159 | 1,467 | #3,708 | 6 |
| 1925 | #157 | 1,510 | — | |
| 1924 | #187 | 1,175 | — | |
| 1923 | #233 | 787 | — | |
| 1922 | #239 | 745 | — | |
| 1921 | #246 | 732 | — | |
| 1920 | #254 | 670 | — | |
| 1919 | #263 | 589 | — | |
| 1918 | #280 | 510 | — | |
| 1917 | #289 | 455 | — | |
| 1916 | #314 | 372 | — | |
| 1915 | #353 | 285 | — | |
| 1914 | #353 | 225 | — | |
| 1913 | #386 | 157 | — | |
| 1912 | #387 | 142 | — | |
| 1911 | #374 | 117 | — | |
| 1910 | #417 | 89 | — | |
| 1909 | #413 | 78 | — | |
| 1908 | #468 | 59 | — | |
| 1907 | #580 | 40 | — | |
| 1906 | #477 | 51 | — | |
| 1905 | #528 | 42 | — | |
| 1904 | #559 | 36 | — | |
| 1903 | #549 | 35 | — | |
| 1902 | #478 | 43 | — | |
| 1901 | #520 | 34 | — | |
| 1900 | #567 | 37 | — | |
| 1899 | #906 | 13 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1894
The first year at least five girls were named Janice! It came in at #1,485, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1894–1898, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Janice is popular in 1917
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Nebraska#124 · 1 in 562
- California#153 · 1 in 719
- Oregon#169 · 1 in 812
- Wisconsin#186 · 1 in 1,294
- Connecticut#187 · 1 in 1,443
Best ever in a state: #2 in North Dakota, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #124 | 21 | 1 in 562 |
| California | #153 | 29 | 1 in 719 |
| Oregon | #169 | 6 | 1 in 812 |
| Wisconsin | #186 | 18 | 1 in 1,294 |
| Connecticut | #187 | 10 | 1 in 1,443 |
| Ohio | #189 | 38 | 1 in 1,334 |
| Maine | #194 | 6 | 1 in 1,009 |
| Maryland | #195 | 9 | 1 in 1,415 |
| Iowa | #196 | 16 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Massachusetts | #196 | 21 | 1 in 1,675 |
| New Jersey | #202 | 17 | 1 in 1,757 |
| Minnesota | #210 | 15 | 1 in 1,439 |
| North Dakota | #211 | 6 | 1 in 1,296 |
| Kansas | #228 | 10 | 1 in 1,496 |
| West Virginia | #252 | 10 | 1 in 1,612 |
| Pennsylvania | #257 | 31 | 1 in 3,013 |
| Illinois | #258 | 25 | 1 in 2,329 |
| New York | #262 | 34 | 1 in 2,859 |
| Florida | #279 | 5 | 1 in 1,783 |
| Michigan | #299 | 12 | 1 in 2,848 |
| Indiana | #309 | 8 | 1 in 3,035 |
| Virginia | #338 | 7 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Missouri | #340 | 10 | 1 in 2,857 |
| Oklahoma | #342 | 8 | 1 in 2,476 |
| Louisiana | #379 | 7 | 1 in 2,681 |
| Arkansas | #380 | 7 | 1 in 2,572 |
| Georgia | #412 | 7 | 1 in 4,462 |
| Texas | #462 | 14 | 1 in 3,376 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Janice
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 266 spots since 2024 (#2,248 → #2,514)
- 555 spots since 2020 (#1,959 → #2,514)
- 1,276 spots since 2015 (#1,238 → #2,514)
- Biggest jump: 339 spots in 1900 (#906 → #567)
- Biggest drop: 209 spots in 2010 (#842 → #1,051)
Rise & fade · girls
57 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1894
- Peaked 1951 at #21 (15,958 births)
- Births halved by 1962, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 36 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1932–1967
- Top 1,000: 109 yrs · run 1899–2004
Share of babies · girls
1 in 112
- Highest: 1 in 112 girls born in 1946 were named Janice (0.89%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,961 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #21 in 1951, was only 1 in 113 (0.89%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 32.9% of all girls named Janice (133,620) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 18 | #906 (1899) | #1,196 |
| 1900s | 455 | #413 (1909) | #514 |
| 1910s | 2,941 | #263 (1919) | #342 |
| 1920s | 11,809 | #136 (1929) | #192 |
| 1930s | 49,343 | #24 (1939) | #62 |
| 1940s | 118,893 | #22 (1947) | #24 |
| 1950s | 133,620 | #21 (1951) | #27 |
| 1960s | 57,966 | #41 (1960) | #78 |
| 1970s | 14,833 | #145 (1970) | #192 |
| 1980s | 7,495 | #257 (1980) | #331 |
| 1990s | 3,951 | #476 (1990) | #600 |
| 2000s | 2,807 | #743 (2000) | #898 |
| 2010s | 1,792 | #1,051 (2010) | #1,324 |
| 2020s | 525 | #1,959 (2020) | #2,167 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Janice in 1917
girls
#289
455 births · 1 in 2,376 girls
Top girls' names in 1917
More about 1917
girls
1,081,267 girls got a published name in 1917; 1 in 2,376 of them was named Janice, which outranked 94.6% of the 5,310 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Janice
Biggest movers since 1916
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.