Jane

#221 for girls in 2025, 1,380 births · Last seen for boys in 2003 at #10,894
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1946 · 8,971 births
Debut · girls
215 births
In top 100 · girls
60 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
379,876
since 1880

Jane over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201959peak #35, 1946girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2211,380
2024#2691,186
2023#2811,116
2022#2901,089
2021#2661,172
2020#2631,169
2019#2771,189
2018#2901,133
2017#2821,157
2016#2791,135
2015#2901,112
2014#3221,026
2013#357898
2012#343927
2011#367868
2010#385833
2009#386831
2008#389826
2007#424775
2006#477665
2005#472651
2004#459657
2003#427704#10,8945
2002#417696
2001#423671
2000#437647
1999#438618
1998#415638
1997#404648
1996#407639
1995#418618
1994#369706
1993#368691
1992#395652#8,4355
1991#363708#5,5219
1990#345773#5,8238
1989#325779#5,6158
1988#340723#5,7517
1987#357668#6,0896
1986#356669#4,13010
1985#335709#4,3339
1984#323725#5,5616
1983#298784#5,4846
1982#289845#6,3855
1981#314762#4,9617
1980#312775
1979#325720#6,0565
1978#328699
1977#318744#4,1648
1976#320697#5,5875
1975#300782#5,4645
1974#288827#3,8378
1973#260957#5,1015
1972#2381,160#4,4416
1971#2321,296#4,3756
1970#2021,601
1969#1701,880#4,4045
1968#1462,192#3,1078
1967#1272,729#2,61110
1966#1113,213#2,9868
1965#953,927#1,98716
1964#934,567#3,2827
1963#755,767#2,53911
1962#736,114#2,36412
1961#726,365#1,87619
1960#676,586#1,85819
1959#676,864#2,03316
1958#617,199#1,72421
1957#567,788#1,95217
1956#508,241#2,62810
1955#508,343#1,90217
1954#498,343#1,82618
1953#438,913#1,67721
1952#429,322#1,93916
1951#438,942#1,68320
1950#398,964#1,65720
1949#418,719#1,70219
1948#398,781#1,65620
1947#369,943#1,78618
1946#358,971#1,15736
1945#367,639#1,63317
1944#416,564#1,57419
1943#446,032#1,57720
1942#465,707#1,42124
1941#465,090#1,33325
1940#475,091#1,25129
1939#464,771#1,32325
1938#444,786#1,31026
1937#424,702#1,48121
1936#424,719#1,29626
1935#434,646#1,65618
1934#484,358#1,65818
1933#474,377#1,64418
1932#494,348#1,71618
1931#504,532#1,58920
1930#554,575#1,60221
1929#624,353#1,67220
1928#624,411#1,64721
1927#604,695#1,43627
1926#564,641#1,60522
1925#534,881#1,53424
1924#535,104#1,96417
1923#554,917#2,61411
1922#554,805#1,88318
1921#475,188#2,50212
1920#485,054#2,9679
1919#534,527#1,88217
1918#534,730#2,69910
1917#554,258#2,18813
1916#623,826#3,5166
1915#693,264#1,87815
1914#712,340
1913#811,759#2,2737
1912#891,390
1911#98937
1910#116709#1,4216
1909#116626
1908#130531#1,3735
1907#124526#1,3455
1906#140438
1905#151393
1904#142395
1903#143381
1902#142388
1901#150325
1900#128495
1899#128382
1898#130406
1897#125396
1896#115413
1895#119394
1894#119390
1893#123354
1892#113396
1891#102379
1890#108372
1889#103374
1888#92446
1887#107288
1886#105306
1885#91330
1884#98295
1883#102247
1882#101254
1881#99216
1880#98215
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Jane was already there! It came in at #98, and was given to 215 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 300 girls a year got the name.

Where Jane is popular in 1959

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #99 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 321 girlsAKMaine: #37 for girls · 67 births · 1 in 147 girlsMEVermont: #57 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 189 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #40 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 149 girlsNHWashington: #99 for girls · 70 births · 1 in 408 girlsWAIdaho: #90 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 353 girlsIDMontana: #75 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 272 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #37 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 161 girlsNDMinnesota: #33 for girls · 300 births · 1 in 132 girlsMNIllinois: #56 for girls · 446 births · 1 in 243 girlsILWisconsin: #29 for girls · 409 births · 1 in 109 girlsWIMichigan: #59 for girls · 375 births · 1 in 240 girlsMINew York: #64 for girls · 600 births · 1 in 281 girlsNYMassachusetts: #36 for girls · 379 births · 1 in 141 girlsMARhode Island: #40 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 148 girlsRIOregon: #96 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 391 girlsORNevada: #97 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 308 girlsNVWyoming: #110 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 400 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #35 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 137 girlsSDIowa: #33 for girls · 225 births · 1 in 127 girlsIAIndiana: #60 for girls · 211 births · 1 in 237 girlsINOhio: #58 for girls · 472 births · 1 in 224 girlsOHPennsylvania: #54 for girls · 488 births · 1 in 234 girlsPANew Jersey: #53 for girls · 259 births · 1 in 221 girlsNJConnecticut: #50 for girls · 123 births · 1 in 199 girlsCTCalifornia: #118 for girls · 336 births · 1 in 495 girlsCAUtah: #100 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 382 girlsUTColorado: #121 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 485 girlsCONebraska: #36 for girls · 102 births · 1 in 144 girlsNEMissouri: #68 for girls · 160 births · 1 in 281 girlsMOKentucky: #76 for girls · 98 births · 1 in 337 girlsKYWest Virginia: #77 for girls · 57 births · 1 in 321 girlsWVVirginia: #77 for girls · 131 births · 1 in 310 girlsVAMaryland: #96 for girls · 84 births · 1 in 363 girlsMDDelaware: #44 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 185 girlsDEArizona: #99 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 389 girlsAZNew Mexico: #142 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 546 girlsNMKansas: #61 for girls · 89 births · 1 in 244 girlsKSArkansas: #133 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 636 girlsARTennessee: #107 for girls · 73 births · 1 in 501 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #84 for girls · 138 births · 1 in 356 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #85 for girls · 73 births · 1 in 364 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #88 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 306 girlsDCOklahoma: #153 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 688 girlsOKLouisiana: #127 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 515 girlsLAMississippi: #173 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 811 girlsMSAlabama: #110 for girls · 69 births · 1 in 513 girlsALGeorgia: #108 for girls · 95 births · 1 in 471 girlsGAHawaii: #124 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 433 girlsHITexas: #163 for girls · 153 births · 1 in 744 girlsTXFlorida: #117 for girls · 95 births · 1 in 514 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wisconsin#29 · 1 in 109
  2. Iowa#33 · 1 in 127
  3. Minnesota#33 · 1 in 132
  4. South Dakota#35 · 1 in 137
  5. Massachusetts#36 · 1 in 141

Best ever in a state: #2 in Hawaii, 1935.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wisconsin#294091 in 109
Iowa#332251 in 127
Minnesota#333001 in 132
South Dakota#35531 in 137
Massachusetts#363791 in 141
Nebraska#361021 in 144
Maine#37671 in 147
North Dakota#37431 in 161
New Hampshire#40371 in 149
Rhode Island#40561 in 148
Delaware#44251 in 185
Connecticut#501231 in 199
New Jersey#532591 in 221
Pennsylvania#544881 in 234
Illinois#564461 in 243
Vermont#57191 in 189
Ohio#584721 in 224
Michigan#593751 in 240
Indiana#602111 in 237
Kansas#61891 in 244
New York#646001 in 281
Missouri#681601 in 281
Montana#75251 in 272
Kentucky#76981 in 337
Virginia#771311 in 310
West Virginia#77571 in 321
North Carolina#841381 in 356
South Carolina#85731 in 364
District of Columbia#88431 in 306
Idaho#90181 in 353
Maryland#96841 in 363
Oregon#96391 in 391
Nevada#9771 in 308
Alaska#9981 in 321
Arizona#99371 in 389
Washington#99701 in 408
Utah#100271 in 382
Tennessee#107731 in 501
Georgia#108951 in 471
Alabama#110691 in 513
Wyoming#11071 in 400
Florida#117951 in 514
California#1183361 in 495
Colorado#121391 in 485
Hawaii#124141 in 433
Louisiana#127771 in 515
Arkansas#133281 in 636
New Mexico#142221 in 546
Oklahoma#153311 in 688
Texas#1631531 in 744
Mississippi#173321 in 811

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jane
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 48 spots since 2024 (#269#221)
  • 42 spots since 2020 (#263#221)
  • 69 spots since 2015 (#290#221)
  • Biggest jump: 53 spots in 2007 (#477#424)
  • Biggest drop: 49 spots in 1995 (#369#418)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1946 at #35 (8,971 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 19 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 60 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 60 yrs · run 1911–1965
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 171
  • Highest: 1 in 171 girls born in 1945 were named Jane (0.58%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,165 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
  • Its best rank, #35 in 1946, was only 1 in 175 (0.57%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 21.8% of all girls named Jane (82,919) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,971#91 (1885)#100
1890s3,882#102 (1891)#118
1900s4,498#116 (1909)#137
1910s27,740#53 (1918)#75
1920s48,049#47 (1921)#55
1930s45,814#42 (1936)#47
1940s72,537#35 (1946)#41
1950s82,919#39 (1950)#50
1960s43,340#67 (1960)#103
1970s9,483#202 (1970)#281
1980s7,439#289 (1982)#325
1990s6,691#345 (1990)#392
2000s7,123#386 (2009)#431
2010s10,278#277 (2019)#319
2020s7,112#221 (2025)#265

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jane in 1959

girls
#67
6,864 births · 1 in 295 girls
boys
#2,033
16 births · 1 in 133,407 boys

Top girls' names in 1959

  1. #1Mary54,502
  2. #2Susan41,617
  3. #3Linda40,410
  4. #4Karen36,784
  5. #5Donna36,468
  6. #6Patricia35,223
  7. #7Debra31,388
  8. #8Cynthia30,186
  9. #9Deborah29,546
  10. #10Lisa25,699
  11. #67Jane6,864

Top boys' names in 1959

  1. #1Michael85,294
  2. #2David83,977
  3. #3James78,648
  4. #4John76,446
  5. #5Robert74,542
  6. #6Mark56,945
  7. #7William51,386
  8. #8Richard47,202
  9. #9Thomas40,296
  10. #10Steven33,597
  11. #2,033Jane16
More about 1959

girls

2,023,462 girls got a published name in 1959; 1 in 295 of them was named Jane, which outranked 99.1% of the 7,202 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jane
  1. #64Annette6,919
  2. #65Wanda6,907
  3. #66Darlene6,876
  4. #67Jane6,864
  5. #68Angela6,772
  6. #69Kathryn6,746
  7. #70Judith6,566
Biggest movers since 1958
Risers
  1. 1,090Alesia#1,985#895
  2. 948Tori#1,791#843
  3. 440Taryn#1,211#771
  4. 437Venus#1,007#570
  5. 393Vilma#1,364#971
Fallers
  1. 283Dani#961#1,244
  2. 257Nicki#973#1,230
  3. 235Lanita#973#1,208
  4. 219Concetta#973#1,192
  5. 197Gisele#766#963

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,134,518 boys got a published name in 1959; 1 in 133,407 of them was named Jane, which outranked 55.5% of the 4,572 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jane
  1. #1,974Timonthy17
  2. #1,974Verl17
  3. #1,974Victoria17
  4. #2,033Jane16
  5. #2,033Aden16
  6. #2,033Ahmad16
  7. #2,033Algernon16
  8. #2,111Albin15
  9. #2,111Algie15
  10. #2,111Alma15

Tied with 77 names at #2,033; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1958
Risers
  1. 2,208Efrem#3,033#825
  2. 901Darin#1,677#776
  3. 871Yancy#1,557#686
  4. 708Raynard#1,677#969
  5. 644Darrin#1,396#752
Fallers
  1. 307Jace#761#1,068
  2. 241Otha#915#1,156
  3. 234Cheryl#994#1,228
  4. 230Dann#969#1,199
  5. 227Carnell#777#1,004

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1959