Jamie
#857 for girls in 2025, 316 births · #577 for boys in 2025, 508 births
Given to girls 75.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1977 · 12,895 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 23 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 270,936since 1884
Jamie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #857 | 316 | #577 | 508 |
| 2024 | #718 | 392 | #622 | 455 |
| 2023 | #782 | 360 | #600 | 473 |
| 2022 | #733 | 397 | #623 | 449 |
| 2021 | #696 | 414 | #624 | 443 |
| 2020 | #707 | 396 | #714 | 351 |
| 2019 | #569 | 534 | #739 | 326 |
| 2018 | #615 | 489 | #721 | 332 |
| 2017 | #608 | 498 | #767 | 306 |
| 2016 | #497 | 629 | #816 | 281 |
| 2015 | #498 | 639 | #812 | 279 |
| 2014 | #493 | 635 | #780 | 296 |
| 2013 | #491 | 610 | #762 | 296 |
| 2012 | #434 | 719 | #843 | 254 |
| 2011 | #438 | 715 | #796 | 278 |
| 2010 | #377 | 841 | #686 | 342 |
| 2009 | #307 | 1,067 | #668 | 367 |
| 2008 | #263 | 1,308 | #664 | 365 |
| 2007 | #249 | 1,397 | #662 | 362 |
| 2006 | #241 | 1,413 | #582 | 422 |
| 2005 | #218 | 1,598 | #550 | 435 |
| 2004 | #199 | 1,726 | #534 | 442 |
| 2003 | #170 | 1,924 | #546 | 412 |
| 2002 | #164 | 1,970 | #529 | 426 |
| 2001 | #167 | 1,945 | #496 | 463 |
| 2000 | #155 | 2,156 | #502 | 455 |
| 1999 | #129 | 2,537 | #444 | 519 |
| 1998 | #112 | 3,066 | #403 | 607 |
| 1997 | #103 | 3,241 | #373 | 656 |
| 1996 | #96 | 3,599 | #354 | 686 |
| 1995 | #93 | 3,770 | #328 | 791 |
| 1994 | #87 | 3,982 | #284 | 954 |
| 1993 | #79 | 4,254 | #259 | 1,111 |
| 1992 | #75 | 4,702 | #249 | 1,159 |
| 1991 | #60 | 5,781 | #232 | 1,286 |
| 1990 | #55 | 6,509 | #227 | 1,321 |
| 1989 | #52 | 6,845 | #197 | 1,474 |
| 1988 | #45 | 7,187 | #188 | 1,470 |
| 1987 | #39 | 7,916 | #178 | 1,541 |
| 1986 | #34 | 9,234 | #182 | 1,468 |
| 1985 | #27 | 11,038 | #167 | 1,630 |
| 1984 | #31 | 9,761 | #154 | 1,764 |
| 1983 | #28 | 11,025 | #153 | 1,773 |
| 1982 | #29 | 11,039 | #131 | 2,091 |
| 1981 | #28 | 10,982 | #118 | 2,356 |
| 1980 | #24 | 11,529 | #105 | 2,845 |
| 1979 | #19 | 12,156 | #88 | 3,240 |
| 1978 | #20 | 10,982 | #95 | 2,864 |
| 1977 | #18 | 12,895 | #82 | 3,447 |
| 1976 | #18 | 12,539 | #62 | 4,621 |
| 1975 | #68 | 4,233 | #62 | 4,573 |
| 1974 | #97 | 3,020 | #68 | 4,086 |
| 1973 | #103 | 2,954 | #70 | 3,913 |
| 1972 | #114 | 2,810 | #72 | 3,680 |
| 1971 | #118 | 3,054 | #96 | 3,231 |
| 1970 | #120 | 3,202 | #125 | 2,641 |
| 1969 | #121 | 2,902 | #179 | 1,568 |
| 1968 | #120 | 2,688 | #193 | 1,223 |
| 1967 | #140 | 2,511 | #217 | 1,031 |
| 1966 | #138 | 2,656 | #225 | 961 |
| 1965 | #140 | 2,748 | #242 | 944 |
| 1964 | #169 | 2,314 | #225 | 1,115 |
| 1963 | #160 | 2,550 | #255 | 897 |
| 1962 | #152 | 2,786 | #266 | 820 |
| 1961 | #171 | 2,337 | #285 | 733 |
| 1960 | #180 | 2,202 | #289 | 738 |
| 1959 | #196 | 1,824 | #284 | 774 |
| 1958 | #231 | 1,312 | #296 | 644 |
| 1957 | #238 | 1,276 | #363 | 442 |
| 1956 | #267 | 1,029 | #444 | 288 |
| 1955 | #241 | 1,145 | #460 | 259 |
| 1954 | #266 | 987 | #456 | 253 |
| 1953 | #277 | 897 | #492 | 204 |
| 1952 | #306 | 691 | #603 | 137 |
| 1951 | #340 | 545 | #745 | 87 |
| 1950 | #371 | 468 | #736 | 87 |
| 1949 | #398 | 401 | #689 | 98 |
| 1948 | #404 | 386 | #666 | 103 |
| 1947 | #451 | 327 | #771 | 79 |
| 1946 | #418 | 337 | #819 | 64 |
| 1945 | #479 | 226 | #671 | 80 |
| 1944 | #674 | 122 | #782 | 64 |
| 1943 | #605 | 154 | #732 | 78 |
| 1942 | #679 | 120 | #876 | 56 |
| 1941 | #802 | 81 | #971 | 43 |
| 1940 | #827 | 74 | #994 | 42 |
| 1939 | #891 | 62 | #976 | 42 |
| 1938 | #830 | 72 | #992 | 41 |
| 1937 | #904 | 58 | #1,119 | 34 |
| 1936 | #979 | 49 | #873 | 49 |
| 1935 | #984 | 49 | #844 | 55 |
| 1934 | #955 | 52 | #956 | 44 |
| 1933 | #985 | 49 | #937 | 45 |
| 1932 | #830 | 68 | #1,004 | 43 |
| 1931 | #830 | 68 | #983 | 45 |
| 1930 | #983 | 56 | #1,151 | 37 |
| 1929 | #1,064 | 47 | #1,078 | 41 |
| 1928 | #974 | 58 | #1,057 | 43 |
| 1927 | #1,023 | 56 | #1,145 | 39 |
| 1926 | #836 | 77 | #931 | 53 |
| 1925 | #976 | 58 | #1,225 | 34 |
| 1924 | #1,058 | 54 | #1,223 | 35 |
| 1923 | #871 | 71 | #1,101 | 42 |
| 1922 | #932 | 63 | #1,107 | 41 |
| 1921 | #955 | 60 | #1,199 | 36 |
| 1920 | #908 | 64 | #1,348 | 29 |
| 1919 | #823 | 73 | #1,139 | 37 |
| 1918 | #894 | 64 | #1,172 | 35 |
| 1917 | #1,054 | 45 | #1,291 | 28 |
| 1916 | #915 | 55 | #1,096 | 35 |
| 1915 | #850 | 59 | #1,082 | 35 |
| 1914 | #1,034 | 33 | #1,153 | 25 |
| 1913 | #881 | 36 | #1,146 | 20 |
| 1912 | #860 | 34 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #1,171 | 15 | #982 | 12 |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #773 | 27 | #893 | 11 |
| 1908 | #1,044 | 15 | — | |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #761 | 23 | #836 | 9 |
| 1904 | #1,092 | 11 | #810 | 9 |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #903 | 15 | — | |
| 1901 | #723 | 20 | — | |
| 1900 | #833 | 20 | #1,162 | 6 |
| 1899 | #878 | 14 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,047 | 11 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,094 | 9 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #1,213 | 8 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | #1,276 | 5 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jamie! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jamie
- 139 spots since 2024 (#718 → #857)
- 150 spots since 2020 (#707 → #857)
- 359 spots since 2015 (#498 → #857)
- Biggest jump: 331 spots in 1905 (#1,092 → #761)
- Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1910 (#773 → #1,110)
- Debuted 1884
- Peaked 1977 at #18 (12,895 births)
- Births halved by 1991, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1974–1996
- Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1930–2025
- Highest: 1 in 117 girls born in 1976 were named Jamie (0.86%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,086 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #18 in 1977, was only 1 in 119 (0.84%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 35.6% of all girls named Jamie (96,556) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2020, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 15 | #1,024 (1884) | #1,149 |
| 1890s | 103 | #791 (1890) | #996 |
| 1900s | 171 | #723 (1901) | #924 |
| 1910s | 430 | #823 (1919) | #959 |
| 1920s | 608 | #836 (1926) | #960 |
| 1930s | 583 | #830 (1938) | #917 |
| 1940s | 2,228 | #398 (1949) | #574 |
| 1950s | 10,174 | #196 (1959) | #273 |
| 1960s | 25,694 | #120 (1968) | #149 |
| 1970s | 67,845 | #18 (1977) | #70 |
| 1980s | 96,556 | #24 (1980) | #34 |
| 1990s | 41,441 | #55 (1990) | #89 |
| 2000s | 16,504 | #155 (2000) | #213 |
| 2010s | 6,309 | #377 (2010) | #502 |
| 2020s | 2,275 | #696 (2021) | #749 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamie in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,722 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 98.5% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 5,405 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 95.4% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.