Jamie
#857 for girls in 2025, 316 births · #577 for boys in 2025, 508 births
Given to girls 75.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1977 · 12,895 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 23 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 270,936since 1884
Jamie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #857 | 316 | #577 | 508 |
| 2024 | #718 | 392 | #622 | 455 |
| 2023 | #782 | 360 | #600 | 473 |
| 2022 | #733 | 397 | #623 | 449 |
| 2021 | #696 | 414 | #624 | 443 |
| 2020 | #707 | 396 | #714 | 351 |
| 2019 | #569 | 534 | #739 | 326 |
| 2018 | #615 | 489 | #721 | 332 |
| 2017 | #608 | 498 | #767 | 306 |
| 2016 | #497 | 629 | #816 | 281 |
| 2015 | #498 | 639 | #812 | 279 |
| 2014 | #493 | 635 | #780 | 296 |
| 2013 | #491 | 610 | #762 | 296 |
| 2012 | #434 | 719 | #843 | 254 |
| 2011 | #438 | 715 | #796 | 278 |
| 2010 | #377 | 841 | #686 | 342 |
| 2009 | #307 | 1,067 | #668 | 367 |
| 2008 | #263 | 1,308 | #664 | 365 |
| 2007 | #249 | 1,397 | #662 | 362 |
| 2006 | #241 | 1,413 | #582 | 422 |
| 2005 | #218 | 1,598 | #550 | 435 |
| 2004 | #199 | 1,726 | #534 | 442 |
| 2003 | #170 | 1,924 | #546 | 412 |
| 2002 | #164 | 1,970 | #529 | 426 |
| 2001 | #167 | 1,945 | #496 | 463 |
| 2000 | #155 | 2,156 | #502 | 455 |
| 1999 | #129 | 2,537 | #444 | 519 |
| 1998 | #112 | 3,066 | #403 | 607 |
| 1997 | #103 | 3,241 | #373 | 656 |
| 1996 | #96 | 3,599 | #354 | 686 |
| 1995 | #93 | 3,770 | #328 | 791 |
| 1994 | #87 | 3,982 | #284 | 954 |
| 1993 | #79 | 4,254 | #259 | 1,111 |
| 1992 | #75 | 4,702 | #249 | 1,159 |
| 1991 | #60 | 5,781 | #232 | 1,286 |
| 1990 | #55 | 6,509 | #227 | 1,321 |
| 1989 | #52 | 6,845 | #197 | 1,474 |
| 1988 | #45 | 7,187 | #188 | 1,470 |
| 1987 | #39 | 7,916 | #178 | 1,541 |
| 1986 | #34 | 9,234 | #182 | 1,468 |
| 1985 | #27 | 11,038 | #167 | 1,630 |
| 1984 | #31 | 9,761 | #154 | 1,764 |
| 1983 | #28 | 11,025 | #153 | 1,773 |
| 1982 | #29 | 11,039 | #131 | 2,091 |
| 1981 | #28 | 10,982 | #118 | 2,356 |
| 1980 | #24 | 11,529 | #105 | 2,845 |
| 1979 | #19 | 12,156 | #88 | 3,240 |
| 1978 | #20 | 10,982 | #95 | 2,864 |
| 1977 | #18 | 12,895 | #82 | 3,447 |
| 1976 | #18 | 12,539 | #62 | 4,621 |
| 1975 | #68 | 4,233 | #62 | 4,573 |
| 1974 | #97 | 3,020 | #68 | 4,086 |
| 1973 | #103 | 2,954 | #70 | 3,913 |
| 1972 | #114 | 2,810 | #72 | 3,680 |
| 1971 | #118 | 3,054 | #96 | 3,231 |
| 1970 | #120 | 3,202 | #125 | 2,641 |
| 1969 | #121 | 2,902 | #179 | 1,568 |
| 1968 | #120 | 2,688 | #193 | 1,223 |
| 1967 | #140 | 2,511 | #217 | 1,031 |
| 1966 | #138 | 2,656 | #225 | 961 |
| 1965 | #140 | 2,748 | #242 | 944 |
| 1964 | #169 | 2,314 | #225 | 1,115 |
| 1963 | #160 | 2,550 | #255 | 897 |
| 1962 | #152 | 2,786 | #266 | 820 |
| 1961 | #171 | 2,337 | #285 | 733 |
| 1960 | #180 | 2,202 | #289 | 738 |
| 1959 | #196 | 1,824 | #284 | 774 |
| 1958 | #231 | 1,312 | #296 | 644 |
| 1957 | #238 | 1,276 | #363 | 442 |
| 1956 | #267 | 1,029 | #444 | 288 |
| 1955 | #241 | 1,145 | #460 | 259 |
| 1954 | #266 | 987 | #456 | 253 |
| 1953 | #277 | 897 | #492 | 204 |
| 1952 | #306 | 691 | #603 | 137 |
| 1951 | #340 | 545 | #745 | 87 |
| 1950 | #371 | 468 | #736 | 87 |
| 1949 | #398 | 401 | #689 | 98 |
| 1948 | #404 | 386 | #666 | 103 |
| 1947 | #451 | 327 | #771 | 79 |
| 1946 | #418 | 337 | #819 | 64 |
| 1945 | #479 | 226 | #671 | 80 |
| 1944 | #674 | 122 | #782 | 64 |
| 1943 | #605 | 154 | #732 | 78 |
| 1942 | #679 | 120 | #876 | 56 |
| 1941 | #802 | 81 | #971 | 43 |
| 1940 | #827 | 74 | #994 | 42 |
| 1939 | #891 | 62 | #976 | 42 |
| 1938 | #830 | 72 | #992 | 41 |
| 1937 | #904 | 58 | #1,119 | 34 |
| 1936 | #979 | 49 | #873 | 49 |
| 1935 | #984 | 49 | #844 | 55 |
| 1934 | #955 | 52 | #956 | 44 |
| 1933 | #985 | 49 | #937 | 45 |
| 1932 | #830 | 68 | #1,004 | 43 |
| 1931 | #830 | 68 | #983 | 45 |
| 1930 | #983 | 56 | #1,151 | 37 |
| 1929 | #1,064 | 47 | #1,078 | 41 |
| 1928 | #974 | 58 | #1,057 | 43 |
| 1927 | #1,023 | 56 | #1,145 | 39 |
| 1926 | #836 | 77 | #931 | 53 |
| 1925 | #976 | 58 | #1,225 | 34 |
| 1924 | #1,058 | 54 | #1,223 | 35 |
| 1923 | #871 | 71 | #1,101 | 42 |
| 1922 | #932 | 63 | #1,107 | 41 |
| 1921 | #955 | 60 | #1,199 | 36 |
| 1920 | #908 | 64 | #1,348 | 29 |
| 1919 | #823 | 73 | #1,139 | 37 |
| 1918 | #894 | 64 | #1,172 | 35 |
| 1917 | #1,054 | 45 | #1,291 | 28 |
| 1916 | #915 | 55 | #1,096 | 35 |
| 1915 | #850 | 59 | #1,082 | 35 |
| 1914 | #1,034 | 33 | #1,153 | 25 |
| 1913 | #881 | 36 | #1,146 | 20 |
| 1912 | #860 | 34 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #1,171 | 15 | #982 | 12 |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | #1,193 | 8 |
| 1909 | #773 | 27 | #893 | 11 |
| 1908 | #1,044 | 15 | — | |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #761 | 23 | #836 | 9 |
| 1904 | #1,092 | 11 | #810 | 9 |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #903 | 15 | — | |
| 1901 | #723 | 20 | — | |
| 1900 | #833 | 20 | #1,162 | 6 |
| 1899 | #878 | 14 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,047 | 11 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,094 | 9 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #1,213 | 8 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | #1,276 | 5 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1884
The first year at least five girls were named Jamie! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jamie is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Wyoming#58 · 1 in 183
- Montana#61 · 1 in 239
- Nevada#67 · 1 in 211
- Hawaii#71 · 1 in 265
- Oklahoma#72 · 1 in 294
Best ever in a state: #2 in Wyoming, 1977.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #58 | 14 | 1 in 183 |
| Montana | #61 | 26 | 1 in 239 |
| Nevada | #67 | 13 | 1 in 211 |
| Hawaii | #71 | 24 | 1 in 265 |
| Oklahoma | #72 | 70 | 1 in 294 |
| Alaska | #92 | 9 | 1 in 300 |
| Idaho | #99 | 16 | 1 in 377 |
| Indiana | #99 | 116 | 1 in 417 |
| Kentucky | #101 | 75 | 1 in 411 |
| Tennessee | #107 | 73 | 1 in 488 |
| Kansas | #108 | 45 | 1 in 441 |
| Washington | #109 | 67 | 1 in 414 |
| Delaware | #110 | 11 | 1 in 397 |
| Arkansas | #113 | 35 | 1 in 504 |
| California | #114 | 356 | 1 in 487 |
| West Virginia | #116 | 32 | 1 in 504 |
| Utah | #124 | 23 | 1 in 459 |
| Vermont | #124 | 7 | 1 in 485 |
| Colorado | #129 | 39 | 1 in 492 |
| Louisiana | #136 | 63 | 1 in 604 |
| Michigan | #137 | 131 | 1 in 627 |
| North Dakota | #137 | 13 | 1 in 476 |
| North Carolina | #143 | 73 | 1 in 653 |
| Ohio | #144 | 149 | 1 in 661 |
| Rhode Island | #148 | 10 | 1 in 783 |
| Illinois | #149 | 148 | 1 in 695 |
| Iowa | #149 | 42 | 1 in 651 |
| Connecticut | #151 | 29 | 1 in 816 |
| South Dakota | #152 | 11 | 1 in 609 |
| Pennsylvania | #154 | 136 | 1 in 767 |
| Wisconsin | #155 | 54 | 1 in 784 |
| Florida | #156 | 71 | 1 in 693 |
| Missouri | #156 | 58 | 1 in 734 |
| Texas | #160 | 158 | 1 in 700 |
| Nebraska | #163 | 20 | 1 in 717 |
| Mississippi | #168 | 31 | 1 in 797 |
| Georgia | #169 | 53 | 1 in 824 |
| Arizona | #172 | 23 | 1 in 671 |
| Alabama | #173 | 39 | 1 in 855 |
| New Mexico | #174 | 18 | 1 in 641 |
| New Hampshire | #180 | 6 | 1 in 926 |
| New Jersey | #183 | 59 | 1 in 967 |
| Maine | #185 | 10 | 1 in 992 |
| Virginia | #186 | 42 | 1 in 958 |
| Oregon | #188 | 18 | 1 in 856 |
| Maryland | #200 | 27 | 1 in 1,085 |
| Minnesota | #201 | 33 | 1 in 1,148 |
| New York | #209 | 148 | 1 in 1,104 |
| District of Columbia | #223 | 12 | 1 in 1,089 |
| South Carolina | #231 | 21 | 1 in 1,208 |
| Massachusetts | #242 | 29 | 1 in 1,771 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jamie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 139 spots since 2024 (#718 → #857)
- 150 spots since 2020 (#707 → #857)
- 359 spots since 2015 (#498 → #857)
- Biggest jump: 331 spots in 1905 (#1,092 → #761)
- Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1910 (#773 → #1,110)
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1884
- Peaked 1977 at #18 (12,895 births)
- Births halved by 1991, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 23 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1974–1996
- Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1930–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 117
- Highest: 1 in 117 girls born in 1976 were named Jamie (0.86%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,086 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #18 in 1977, was only 1 in 119 (0.84%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 35.6% of all girls named Jamie (96,556) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2021
- Mostly girls until 2020, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 15 | #1,024 (1884) | #1,149 |
| 1890s | 103 | #791 (1890) | #996 |
| 1900s | 171 | #723 (1901) | #924 |
| 1910s | 430 | #823 (1919) | #959 |
| 1920s | 608 | #836 (1926) | #960 |
| 1930s | 583 | #830 (1938) | #917 |
| 1940s | 2,228 | #398 (1949) | #574 |
| 1950s | 10,174 | #196 (1959) | #273 |
| 1960s | 25,694 | #120 (1968) | #149 |
| 1970s | 67,845 | #18 (1977) | #70 |
| 1980s | 96,556 | #24 (1980) | #34 |
| 1990s | 41,441 | #55 (1990) | #89 |
| 2000s | 16,504 | #155 (2000) | #213 |
| 2010s | 6,309 | #377 (2010) | #502 |
| 2020s | 2,275 | #696 (2021) | #749 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamie in 1962
girls
#152
2,786 births · 1 in 706 girls
boys
#266
820 births · 1 in 2,523 boys
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 706 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 98.0% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jamie
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 2,523 of them was named Jamie, which outranked 94.3% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jamie
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.