Jamey
#11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births · #4,249 for boys in 2025, 24 births
Given to boys 68.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1976 · 430 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,755since 1944
Jamey over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | #4,249 | 24 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #4,890 | 20 |
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | #5,927 | 15 |
| 2022 | — | #4,701 | 21 | |
| 2021 | #8,024 | 13 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | #4,275 | 23 |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | #4,114 | 25 |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 | #3,993 | 26 |
| 2017 | #9,341 | 11 | #4,594 | 21 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #4,943 | 19 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #4,295 | 23 |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | #6,307 | 13 |
| 2013 | #9,612 | 11 | #4,981 | 18 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #5,543 | 24 | #5,675 | 15 |
| 2010 | #5,771 | 23 | #3,708 | 28 |
| 2009 | #5,709 | 24 | #4,429 | 22 |
| 2008 | #6,130 | 22 | #3,421 | 32 |
| 2007 | #4,567 | 32 | #4,808 | 19 |
| 2006 | #4,953 | 28 | #4,223 | 22 |
| 2005 | #4,373 | 31 | #3,615 | 26 |
| 2004 | #3,898 | 36 | #4,602 | 18 |
| 2003 | #4,109 | 32 | #3,838 | 22 |
| 2002 | #4,179 | 30 | #2,685 | 35 |
| 2001 | #4,564 | 26 | #3,974 | 20 |
| 2000 | #3,738 | 34 | #3,922 | 20 |
| 1999 | #4,313 | 26 | #2,939 | 28 |
| 1998 | #3,068 | 41 | #2,851 | 28 |
| 1997 | #3,365 | 34 | #1,991 | 45 |
| 1996 | #3,093 | 38 | #1,842 | 49 |
| 1995 | #2,977 | 39 | #2,026 | 41 |
| 1994 | #2,877 | 41 | #1,581 | 58 |
| 1993 | #2,882 | 41 | #1,792 | 47 |
| 1992 | #2,128 | 63 | #1,359 | 69 |
| 1991 | #2,660 | 45 | #1,422 | 64 |
| 1990 | #2,600 | 45 | #1,336 | 69 |
| 1989 | #2,572 | 44 | #1,228 | 76 |
| 1988 | #2,187 | 52 | #1,204 | 71 |
| 1987 | #2,129 | 51 | #1,114 | 74 |
| 1986 | #1,866 | 60 | #1,067 | 76 |
| 1985 | #1,710 | 67 | #810 | 120 |
| 1984 | #1,837 | 58 | #823 | 113 |
| 1983 | #1,552 | 72 | #906 | 95 |
| 1982 | #1,384 | 88 | #827 | 115 |
| 1981 | #1,193 | 110 | #654 | 171 |
| 1980 | #1,419 | 86 | #640 | 184 |
| 1979 | #1,184 | 111 | #556 | 239 |
| 1978 | #1,221 | 102 | #533 | 240 |
| 1977 | #1,004 | 134 | #435 | 332 |
| 1976 | #903 | 146 | #369 | 430 |
| 1975 | #1,544 | 65 | #389 | 402 |
| 1974 | #1,486 | 66 | #391 | 394 |
| 1973 | #1,570 | 59 | #394 | 388 |
| 1972 | #1,516 | 62 | #398 | 387 |
| 1971 | #1,473 | 69 | #457 | 316 |
| 1970 | #1,562 | 62 | #470 | 294 |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | #601 | 170 |
| 1968 | #1,776 | 44 | #707 | 114 |
| 1967 | #1,821 | 41 | #705 | 110 |
| 1966 | #1,916 | 36 | #901 | 64 |
| 1965 | #2,411 | 25 | #777 | 90 |
| 1964 | #2,475 | 25 | #849 | 80 |
| 1963 | #1,922 | 37 | #936 | 64 |
| 1962 | #1,947 | 35 | #817 | 86 |
| 1961 | #2,411 | 25 | #940 | 66 |
| 1960 | #2,150 | 29 | #951 | 63 |
| 1959 | #2,339 | 24 | #906 | 71 |
| 1958 | #2,025 | 30 | #994 | 59 |
| 1957 | #2,168 | 26 | #1,165 | 44 |
| 1956 | #3,186 | 14 | #1,722 | 21 |
| 1955 | #2,635 | 18 | #1,845 | 18 |
| 1954 | #2,027 | 27 | #2,316 | 12 |
| 1953 | #3,106 | 13 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #3,201 | 12 | #2,376 | 11 |
| 1951 | #2,116 | 22 | #3,364 | 6 |
| 1950 | #2,341 | 18 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | — | |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #2,862 | 8 |
| 1946 | #3,217 | 10 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1944 | #4,574 | 5 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jamey! It came in at #3,430, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1944–1946, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Jamey
- 641 spots since 2024 (#4,890 → #4,249)
- 26 spots since 2020 (#4,275 → #4,249)
- 46 spots since 2015 (#4,295 → #4,249)
- Biggest jump: 196 spots in 1967 (#901 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 257 spots in 1986 (#810 → #1,067)
- Debuted 1944
- Peaked 1976 at #369 (430 births)
- Births halved by 1980, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1958–1985
- Highest: 1 in 3,649 boys born in 1976 were named Jamey (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 71,170 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 50.7% of all boys named Jamey (3,422) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2011, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 18 | #2,862 (1947) | #3,320 |
| 1950s | 257 | #906 (1959) | #2,073 |
| 1960s | 907 | #601 (1969) | #818 |
| 1970s | 3,422 | #369 (1976) | #439 |
| 1980s | 1,095 | #640 (1980) | #927 |
| 1990s | 498 | #1,336 (1990) | #1,914 |
| 2000s | 236 | #2,685 (2002) | #3,952 |
| 2010s | 203 | #3,708 (2010) | #4,833 |
| 2020s | 119 | #4,249 (2025) | #4,934 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jamey in 1969
Top girls' names in 1969
Top boys' names in 1969
More about 1969
girls
1,687,016 girls got a published name in 1969; 1 in 30,673 of them was named Jamey, which outranked 81.5% of the 8,708 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,591Samatha56
- #1,591Theodora56
- #1,591Todd56
- #1,609Jamey55
- #1,609Bari55
- #1,609Cecily55
- #1,609Chantell55
- #1,635Abbie54
- #1,635Goldie54
- #1,635Jasmine54
Tied with 25 names at #1,609; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,788,174 boys got a published name in 1969; 1 in 10,519 of them was named Jamey, which outranked 88.1% of the 5,043 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 27.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 449Artis#877 → #1,326
- ↓ 410Kennedy#986 → #1,396
- ↓ 408Alfie#968 → #1,376
- ↓ 360Micky#861 → #1,221
- ↓ 356Montgomery#946 → #1,302
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.