Jalynn
#6,838 for girls in 2025, 16 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 92.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 265 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,774since 1957
Jalynn over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,838 | 16 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #6,394 | 18 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,476 | 45 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,671 | 29 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #4,090 | 35 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,091 | 51 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,451 | 45 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #2,869 | 58 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #2,779 | 61 | #7,095 | 11 |
| 2016 | #2,221 | 86 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #2,236 | 84 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,892 | 106 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #1,675 | 126 | #7,537 | 10 |
| 2012 | #1,251 | 193 | #6,306 | 13 |
| 2011 | #1,235 | 194 | #5,200 | 17 |
| 2010 | #1,185 | 205 | #5,251 | 17 |
| 2009 | #1,073 | 238 | #4,160 | 24 |
| 2008 | #1,029 | 255 | #4,714 | 20 |
| 2007 | #910 | 302 | #3,793 | 27 |
| 2006 | #945 | 277 | #5,525 | 15 |
| 2005 | #931 | 267 | #4,062 | 22 |
| 2004 | #993 | 238 | #4,005 | 22 |
| 2003 | #898 | 265 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | #909 | 245 | #4,919 | 15 |
| 2001 | #1,037 | 207 | #3,617 | 23 |
| 2000 | #1,120 | 182 | #4,066 | 19 |
| 1999 | #1,187 | 163 | #3,591 | 21 |
| 1998 | #1,416 | 121 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #1,707 | 91 | #5,288 | 11 |
| 1996 | #1,915 | 75 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #1,955 | 70 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #1,929 | 73 | #5,452 | 10 |
| 1993 | #2,090 | 65 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #3,267 | 34 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | — | |
| 1989 | #7,449 | 10 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | — | |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | — | |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | — | |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #4,272 | 10 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | — | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1957
The first year at least five girls were named Jalynn! It came in at #5,377, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958–1961, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jalynn
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 444 spots since 2024 (#6,394 → #6,838)
- 3,747 spots since 2020 (#3,091 → #6,838)
- 4,602 spots since 2015 (#2,236 → #6,838)
- Biggest jump: 128 spots in 2002 (#1,037 → #909)
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 2008 (#910 → #1,029)
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1957
- Peaked 2003 at #898 (265 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 6 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 2002–2007
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,366
- Highest: 1 in 6,366 girls born in 2007 were named Jalynn (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 100,454 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #898 in 2003, was only 1 in 6,895 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 51.9% of all girls named Jalynn (2,476) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 11 | #5,377 (1957) | #5,811 |
| 1960s | 40 | #3,952 (1965) | #5,302 |
| 1970s | 62 | #5,776 (1974) | #6,819 |
| 1980s | 114 | #3,874 (1984) | #6,256 |
| 1990s | 719 | #1,187 (1999) | #2,843 |
| 2000s | 2,476 | #898 (2003) | #985 |
| 2010s | 1,158 | #1,185 (2010) | #2,079 |
| 2020s | 194 | #3,091 (2020) | #4,760 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jalynn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: