Jackie
#2,153 for girls in 2025, 86 births · #2,258 for boys in 2025, 62 births
Given to girls 53.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1961 · 4,256 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 91,253since 1899
Jackie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,153 | 86 | #2,258 | 62 |
| 2024 | #2,282 | 81 | #2,873 | 44 |
| 2023 | #2,288 | 80 | #2,614 | 50 |
| 2022 | #2,425 | 75 | #2,563 | 53 |
| 2021 | #2,366 | 76 | #2,000 | 74 |
| 2020 | #2,302 | 77 | #2,392 | 55 |
| 2019 | #2,538 | 69 | #2,491 | 53 |
| 2018 | #2,026 | 96 | #1,777 | 86 |
| 2017 | #2,108 | 91 | #1,918 | 75 |
| 2016 | #2,129 | 91 | #1,788 | 85 |
| 2015 | #2,039 | 96 | #1,717 | 90 |
| 2014 | #1,746 | 119 | #1,857 | 79 |
| 2013 | #2,108 | 90 | #2,225 | 58 |
| 2012 | #1,983 | 98 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #1,592 | 136 | #1,738 | 84 |
| 2010 | #1,913 | 105 | #1,913 | 74 |
| 2009 | #1,676 | 133 | #1,573 | 103 |
| 2008 | #1,653 | 136 | #1,532 | 105 |
| 2007 | #1,560 | 145 | #1,380 | 119 |
| 2006 | #1,761 | 118 | #1,360 | 119 |
| 2005 | #1,589 | 128 | #1,315 | 115 |
| 2004 | #1,397 | 149 | #1,267 | 119 |
| 2003 | #1,454 | 135 | #1,055 | 147 |
| 2002 | #1,224 | 164 | #1,033 | 148 |
| 2001 | #1,396 | 136 | #882 | 178 |
| 2000 | #1,329 | 142 | #809 | 199 |
| 1999 | #1,094 | 182 | #807 | 189 |
| 1998 | #1,105 | 174 | #777 | 201 |
| 1997 | #1,004 | 193 | #763 | 195 |
| 1996 | #783 | 265 | #785 | 186 |
| 1995 | #828 | 237 | #847 | 162 |
| 1994 | #774 | 263 | #742 | 199 |
| 1993 | #682 | 320 | #730 | 203 |
| 1992 | #623 | 363 | #702 | 215 |
| 1991 | #588 | 390 | #636 | 258 |
| 1990 | #523 | 457 | #625 | 263 |
| 1989 | #475 | 500 | #598 | 268 |
| 1988 | #431 | 528 | #584 | 251 |
| 1987 | #398 | 576 | #572 | 251 |
| 1986 | #428 | 503 | #538 | 275 |
| 1985 | #388 | 586 | #504 | 299 |
| 1984 | #394 | 546 | #496 | 288 |
| 1983 | #341 | 675 | #459 | 330 |
| 1982 | #320 | 756 | #431 | 376 |
| 1981 | #338 | 696 | #401 | 411 |
| 1980 | #349 | 681 | #377 | 457 |
| 1979 | #330 | 711 | #393 | 418 |
| 1978 | #314 | 732 | #365 | 441 |
| 1977 | #298 | 794 | #344 | 521 |
| 1976 | #314 | 730 | #313 | 561 |
| 1975 | #271 | 886 | #308 | 589 |
| 1974 | #279 | 913 | #311 | 589 |
| 1973 | #269 | 930 | #284 | 639 |
| 1972 | #259 | 1,026 | #283 | 672 |
| 1971 | #239 | 1,216 | #281 | 736 |
| 1970 | #230 | 1,366 | #281 | 753 |
| 1969 | #226 | 1,343 | #275 | 731 |
| 1968 | #196 | 1,584 | #272 | 724 |
| 1967 | #186 | 1,681 | #248 | 808 |
| 1966 | #174 | 1,936 | #258 | 784 |
| 1965 | #156 | 2,441 | #249 | 886 |
| 1964 | #128 | 3,236 | #246 | 978 |
| 1963 | #142 | 2,821 | #231 | 1,064 |
| 1962 | #126 | 3,611 | #223 | 1,159 |
| 1961 | #112 | 4,256 | #213 | 1,317 |
| 1960 | #144 | 2,985 | #207 | 1,367 |
| 1959 | #155 | 2,738 | #197 | 1,459 |
| 1958 | #152 | 2,658 | #188 | 1,505 |
| 1957 | #162 | 2,363 | #178 | 1,707 |
| 1956 | #180 | 1,982 | #164 | 1,862 |
| 1955 | #187 | 1,797 | #148 | 2,000 |
| 1954 | #185 | 1,733 | #149 | 1,954 |
| 1953 | #184 | 1,729 | #145 | 1,970 |
| 1952 | #190 | 1,561 | #144 | 2,009 |
| 1951 | #197 | 1,467 | #133 | 2,053 |
| 1950 | #209 | 1,275 | #140 | 1,927 |
| 1949 | #211 | 1,274 | #140 | 1,958 |
| 1948 | #187 | 1,467 | #147 | 1,832 |
| 1947 | #174 | 1,660 | #141 | 1,990 |
| 1946 | #174 | 1,528 | #139 | 1,729 |
| 1945 | #172 | 1,262 | #142 | 1,493 |
| 1944 | #171 | 1,250 | #128 | 1,642 |
| 1943 | #172 | 1,351 | #124 | 1,778 |
| 1942 | #181 | 1,223 | #119 | 1,847 |
| 1941 | #178 | 1,094 | #110 | 1,968 |
| 1940 | #189 | 981 | #108 | 1,888 |
| 1939 | #185 | 1,014 | #105 | 1,889 |
| 1938 | #185 | 1,062 | #105 | 1,943 |
| 1937 | #197 | 899 | #107 | 1,815 |
| 1936 | #190 | 948 | #106 | 1,811 |
| 1935 | #211 | 805 | #102 | 1,901 |
| 1934 | #206 | 859 | #114 | 1,567 |
| 1933 | #230 | 700 | #123 | 1,339 |
| 1932 | #235 | 671 | #130 | 1,317 |
| 1931 | #240 | 631 | #142 | 1,122 |
| 1930 | #247 | 626 | #157 | 974 |
| 1929 | #287 | 512 | #179 | 780 |
| 1928 | #314 | 436 | #216 | 606 |
| 1927 | #315 | 451 | #260 | 486 |
| 1926 | #370 | 333 | #300 | 361 |
| 1925 | #423 | 267 | #355 | 276 |
| 1924 | #412 | 282 | #429 | 203 |
| 1923 | #533 | 177 | #589 | 114 |
| 1922 | #579 | 152 | #722 | 82 |
| 1921 | #615 | 141 | #1,140 | 39 |
| 1920 | #598 | 144 | #1,139 | 39 |
| 1919 | #646 | 115 | #1,188 | 35 |
| 1918 | #653 | 117 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #775 | 79 | #1,900 | 16 |
| 1916 | #831 | 66 | #2,043 | 14 |
| 1915 | #811 | 65 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #855 | 47 | #1,388 | 19 |
| 1913 | #782 | 45 | #1,945 | 9 |
| 1912 | #735 | 46 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #825 | 27 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #644 | 43 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #706 | 32 | — | |
| 1908 | #809 | 23 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,002 | 14 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,298 | 9 | — | |
| 1904 | #805 | 20 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #1,027 | 12 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,099 | 9 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1899
The first year at least five girls were named Jackie! It came in at #1,099, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1902, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Jackie is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Utah#57 · 1 in 220
- South Carolina#64 · 1 in 267
- Tennessee#70 · 1 in 297
- Wyoming#80 · 1 in 257
- South Dakota#80 · 1 in 305
Best ever in a state: #57 in Utah, 1962.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #57 | 48 | 1 in 220 |
| South Carolina | #64 | 95 | 1 in 267 |
| Tennessee | #70 | 120 | 1 in 297 |
| South Dakota | #80 | 22 | 1 in 305 |
| Wyoming | #80 | 10 | 1 in 257 |
| Georgia | #84 | 131 | 1 in 333 |
| North Carolina | #84 | 137 | 1 in 348 |
| North Dakota | #84 | 22 | 1 in 281 |
| Colorado | #85 | 55 | 1 in 349 |
| Kentucky | #87 | 84 | 1 in 367 |
| Alabama | #90 | 90 | 1 in 371 |
| West Virginia | #94 | 42 | 1 in 384 |
| Indiana | #95 | 119 | 1 in 407 |
| Kansas | #96 | 51 | 1 in 389 |
| Nevada | #96 | 9 | 1 in 305 |
| Minnesota | #97 | 101 | 1 in 375 |
| Missouri | #97 | 109 | 1 in 391 |
| Idaho | #99 | 16 | 1 in 377 |
| Mississippi | #99 | 63 | 1 in 392 |
| Montana | #100 | 18 | 1 in 345 |
| Arkansas | #102 | 43 | 1 in 410 |
| Ohio | #104 | 222 | 1 in 444 |
| Florida | #109 | 108 | 1 in 456 |
| New Mexico | #110 | 32 | 1 in 360 |
| Oklahoma | #111 | 46 | 1 in 448 |
| Iowa | #112 | 60 | 1 in 456 |
| Michigan | #113 | 169 | 1 in 486 |
| Nebraska | #117 | 30 | 1 in 478 |
| Louisiana | #118 | 76 | 1 in 501 |
| Wisconsin | #118 | 77 | 1 in 550 |
| Texas | #121 | 212 | 1 in 521 |
| Washington | #122 | 56 | 1 in 495 |
| Oregon | #128 | 31 | 1 in 497 |
| Virginia | #130 | 74 | 1 in 544 |
| Arizona | #132 | 32 | 1 in 482 |
| Illinois | #143 | 155 | 1 in 664 |
| Maryland | #144 | 44 | 1 in 666 |
| California | #145 | 280 | 1 in 620 |
| New Hampshire | #150 | 8 | 1 in 694 |
| District of Columbia | #153 | 20 | 1 in 653 |
| Alaska | #158 | 5 | 1 in 540 |
| Pennsylvania | #159 | 133 | 1 in 785 |
| New York | #167 | 199 | 1 in 821 |
| Maine | #170 | 12 | 1 in 826 |
| New Jersey | #172 | 65 | 1 in 878 |
| Delaware | #176 | 5 | 1 in 874 |
| Rhode Island | #186 | 7 | 1 in 1,119 |
| Connecticut | #188 | 22 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Massachusetts | #202 | 37 | 1 in 1,388 |
| Hawaii | #234 | 7 | 1 in 909 |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jackie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 129 spots since 2024 (#2,282 → #2,153)
- 149 spots since 2020 (#2,302 → #2,153)
- 114 spots since 2015 (#2,039 → #2,153)
- Biggest jump: 222 spots in 1904 (#1,027 → #805)
- Biggest drop: 493 spots in 1905 (#805 → #1,298)
Rise & fade · girls
62 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1961 at #112 (4,256 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 91 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 91 yrs · run 1907–1996
Share of babies · girls
1 in 474
- Highest: 1 in 474 girls born in 1961 were named Jackie (0.21%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,689 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 28.4% of all girls named Jackie (25,894) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2013
- Mostly boys until 2012, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 9 | #1,099 (1899) | #1,099 |
| 1900s | 150 | #706 (1909) | #1,068 |
| 1910s | 650 | #644 (1910) | #756 |
| 1920s | 2,895 | #287 (1929) | #445 |
| 1930s | 8,215 | #185 (1938) | #213 |
| 1940s | 13,090 | #171 (1944) | #181 |
| 1950s | 19,303 | #152 (1958) | #180 |
| 1960s | 25,894 | #112 (1961) | #159 |
| 1970s | 9,304 | #230 (1970) | #280 |
| 1980s | 6,047 | #320 (1982) | #386 |
| 1990s | 2,844 | #523 (1990) | #800 |
| 2000s | 1,386 | #1,224 (2002) | #1,504 |
| 2010s | 991 | #1,592 (2011) | #2,018 |
| 2020s | 475 | #2,153 (2025) | #2,303 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jackie in 1962
girls
#126
3,611 births · 1 in 545 girls
boys
#223
1,159 births · 1 in 1,785 boys
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 545 of them was named Jackie, which outranked 98.3% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jackie
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 1,785 of them was named Jackie, which outranked 95.2% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jackie
Biggest movers since 1961
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.