Jackie
#2,153 for girls in 2025, 86 births · #2,258 for boys in 2025, 62 births
Given to girls 53.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1961 · 4,256 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 91,253since 1899
Jackie over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,153 | 86 | #2,258 | 62 |
| 2024 | #2,282 | 81 | #2,873 | 44 |
| 2023 | #2,288 | 80 | #2,614 | 50 |
| 2022 | #2,425 | 75 | #2,563 | 53 |
| 2021 | #2,366 | 76 | #2,000 | 74 |
| 2020 | #2,302 | 77 | #2,392 | 55 |
| 2019 | #2,538 | 69 | #2,491 | 53 |
| 2018 | #2,026 | 96 | #1,777 | 86 |
| 2017 | #2,108 | 91 | #1,918 | 75 |
| 2016 | #2,129 | 91 | #1,788 | 85 |
| 2015 | #2,039 | 96 | #1,717 | 90 |
| 2014 | #1,746 | 119 | #1,857 | 79 |
| 2013 | #2,108 | 90 | #2,225 | 58 |
| 2012 | #1,983 | 98 | #1,448 | 114 |
| 2011 | #1,592 | 136 | #1,738 | 84 |
| 2010 | #1,913 | 105 | #1,913 | 74 |
| 2009 | #1,676 | 133 | #1,573 | 103 |
| 2008 | #1,653 | 136 | #1,532 | 105 |
| 2007 | #1,560 | 145 | #1,380 | 119 |
| 2006 | #1,761 | 118 | #1,360 | 119 |
| 2005 | #1,589 | 128 | #1,315 | 115 |
| 2004 | #1,397 | 149 | #1,267 | 119 |
| 2003 | #1,454 | 135 | #1,055 | 147 |
| 2002 | #1,224 | 164 | #1,033 | 148 |
| 2001 | #1,396 | 136 | #882 | 178 |
| 2000 | #1,329 | 142 | #809 | 199 |
| 1999 | #1,094 | 182 | #807 | 189 |
| 1998 | #1,105 | 174 | #777 | 201 |
| 1997 | #1,004 | 193 | #763 | 195 |
| 1996 | #783 | 265 | #785 | 186 |
| 1995 | #828 | 237 | #847 | 162 |
| 1994 | #774 | 263 | #742 | 199 |
| 1993 | #682 | 320 | #730 | 203 |
| 1992 | #623 | 363 | #702 | 215 |
| 1991 | #588 | 390 | #636 | 258 |
| 1990 | #523 | 457 | #625 | 263 |
| 1989 | #475 | 500 | #598 | 268 |
| 1988 | #431 | 528 | #584 | 251 |
| 1987 | #398 | 576 | #572 | 251 |
| 1986 | #428 | 503 | #538 | 275 |
| 1985 | #388 | 586 | #504 | 299 |
| 1984 | #394 | 546 | #496 | 288 |
| 1983 | #341 | 675 | #459 | 330 |
| 1982 | #320 | 756 | #431 | 376 |
| 1981 | #338 | 696 | #401 | 411 |
| 1980 | #349 | 681 | #377 | 457 |
| 1979 | #330 | 711 | #393 | 418 |
| 1978 | #314 | 732 | #365 | 441 |
| 1977 | #298 | 794 | #344 | 521 |
| 1976 | #314 | 730 | #313 | 561 |
| 1975 | #271 | 886 | #308 | 589 |
| 1974 | #279 | 913 | #311 | 589 |
| 1973 | #269 | 930 | #284 | 639 |
| 1972 | #259 | 1,026 | #283 | 672 |
| 1971 | #239 | 1,216 | #281 | 736 |
| 1970 | #230 | 1,366 | #281 | 753 |
| 1969 | #226 | 1,343 | #275 | 731 |
| 1968 | #196 | 1,584 | #272 | 724 |
| 1967 | #186 | 1,681 | #248 | 808 |
| 1966 | #174 | 1,936 | #258 | 784 |
| 1965 | #156 | 2,441 | #249 | 886 |
| 1964 | #128 | 3,236 | #246 | 978 |
| 1963 | #142 | 2,821 | #231 | 1,064 |
| 1962 | #126 | 3,611 | #223 | 1,159 |
| 1961 | #112 | 4,256 | #213 | 1,317 |
| 1960 | #144 | 2,985 | #207 | 1,367 |
| 1959 | #155 | 2,738 | #197 | 1,459 |
| 1958 | #152 | 2,658 | #188 | 1,505 |
| 1957 | #162 | 2,363 | #178 | 1,707 |
| 1956 | #180 | 1,982 | #164 | 1,862 |
| 1955 | #187 | 1,797 | #148 | 2,000 |
| 1954 | #185 | 1,733 | #149 | 1,954 |
| 1953 | #184 | 1,729 | #145 | 1,970 |
| 1952 | #190 | 1,561 | #144 | 2,009 |
| 1951 | #197 | 1,467 | #133 | 2,053 |
| 1950 | #209 | 1,275 | #140 | 1,927 |
| 1949 | #211 | 1,274 | #140 | 1,958 |
| 1948 | #187 | 1,467 | #147 | 1,832 |
| 1947 | #174 | 1,660 | #141 | 1,990 |
| 1946 | #174 | 1,528 | #139 | 1,729 |
| 1945 | #172 | 1,262 | #142 | 1,493 |
| 1944 | #171 | 1,250 | #128 | 1,642 |
| 1943 | #172 | 1,351 | #124 | 1,778 |
| 1942 | #181 | 1,223 | #119 | 1,847 |
| 1941 | #178 | 1,094 | #110 | 1,968 |
| 1940 | #189 | 981 | #108 | 1,888 |
| 1939 | #185 | 1,014 | #105 | 1,889 |
| 1938 | #185 | 1,062 | #105 | 1,943 |
| 1937 | #197 | 899 | #107 | 1,815 |
| 1936 | #190 | 948 | #106 | 1,811 |
| 1935 | #211 | 805 | #102 | 1,901 |
| 1934 | #206 | 859 | #114 | 1,567 |
| 1933 | #230 | 700 | #123 | 1,339 |
| 1932 | #235 | 671 | #130 | 1,317 |
| 1931 | #240 | 631 | #142 | 1,122 |
| 1930 | #247 | 626 | #157 | 974 |
| 1929 | #287 | 512 | #179 | 780 |
| 1928 | #314 | 436 | #216 | 606 |
| 1927 | #315 | 451 | #260 | 486 |
| 1926 | #370 | 333 | #300 | 361 |
| 1925 | #423 | 267 | #355 | 276 |
| 1924 | #412 | 282 | #429 | 203 |
| 1923 | #533 | 177 | #589 | 114 |
| 1922 | #579 | 152 | #722 | 82 |
| 1921 | #615 | 141 | #1,140 | 39 |
| 1920 | #598 | 144 | #1,139 | 39 |
| 1919 | #646 | 115 | #1,188 | 35 |
| 1918 | #653 | 117 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #775 | 79 | #1,900 | 16 |
| 1916 | #831 | 66 | #2,043 | 14 |
| 1915 | #811 | 65 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #855 | 47 | #1,388 | 19 |
| 1913 | #782 | 45 | #1,945 | 9 |
| 1912 | #735 | 46 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | #825 | 27 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #644 | 43 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #706 | 32 | — | |
| 1908 | #809 | 23 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,002 | 14 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,298 | 9 | — | |
| 1904 | #805 | 20 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #1,027 | 12 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,099 | 9 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jackie! It came in at #1,099, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1902, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Jackie is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arkansas#78 · 1 in 356
- Oklahoma#85 · 1 in 407
- Idaho#100 · 1 in 389
- Georgia#108 · 1 in 466
- Wyoming#118 · 1 in 463
Best ever in a state: #57 in Utah, 1962.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | #78 | 58 | 1 in 356 |
| Oklahoma | #85 | 53 | 1 in 407 |
| Idaho | #100 | 16 | 1 in 389 |
| Georgia | #108 | 92 | 1 in 466 |
| Wyoming | #118 | 6 | 1 in 463 |
| North Carolina | #121 | 81 | 1 in 624 |
| Tennessee | #122 | 58 | 1 in 654 |
| Kansas | #123 | 29 | 1 in 673 |
| Nebraska | #128 | 21 | 1 in 680 |
| Texas | #128 | 160 | 1 in 637 |
| Utah | #133 | 16 | 1 in 577 |
| Alabama | #139 | 54 | 1 in 677 |
| Missouri | #149 | 42 | 1 in 980 |
| Oregon | #149 | 20 | 1 in 788 |
| Colorado | #155 | 20 | 1 in 780 |
| Kentucky | #157 | 35 | 1 in 969 |
| Montana | #160 | 8 | 1 in 763 |
| South Carolina | #160 | 40 | 1 in 711 |
| North Dakota | #161 | 8 | 1 in 870 |
| West Virginia | #161 | 22 | 1 in 1,042 |
| Washington | #173 | 26 | 1 in 993 |
| California | #181 | 113 | 1 in 1,070 |
| Mississippi | #185 | 33 | 1 in 867 |
| Ohio | #185 | 67 | 1 in 1,363 |
| Iowa | #186 | 21 | 1 in 1,402 |
| Indiana | #188 | 34 | 1 in 1,333 |
| Louisiana | #189 | 36 | 1 in 984 |
| Virginia | #199 | 30 | 1 in 1,250 |
| Illinois | #204 | 57 | 1 in 1,612 |
| Michigan | #206 | 45 | 1 in 1,744 |
| Florida | #215 | 24 | 1 in 1,285 |
| Arizona | #217 | 9 | 1 in 1,087 |
| Maine | #237 | 5 | 1 in 1,762 |
| Maryland | #253 | 12 | 1 in 2,058 |
| Wisconsin | #265 | 13 | 1 in 3,025 |
| New Mexico | #268 | 6 | 1 in 1,593 |
| Pennsylvania | #291 | 34 | 1 in 3,191 |
| New Jersey | #308 | 13 | 1 in 3,565 |
| Minnesota | #363 | 8 | 1 in 4,462 |
| New York | #471 | 24 | 1 in 6,238 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jackie
- 129 spots since 2024 (#2,282 → #2,153)
- 149 spots since 2020 (#2,302 → #2,153)
- 114 spots since 2015 (#2,039 → #2,153)
- Biggest jump: 222 spots in 1904 (#1,027 → #805)
- Biggest drop: 493 spots in 1905 (#805 → #1,298)
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1961 at #112 (4,256 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 91 yrs · run 1907–1996
- Highest: 1 in 474 girls born in 1961 were named Jackie (0.21%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,689 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 28.4% of all girls named Jackie (25,894) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 2012, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 9 | #1,099 (1899) | #1,099 |
| 1900s | 150 | #706 (1909) | #1,068 |
| 1910s | 650 | #644 (1910) | #756 |
| 1920s | 2,895 | #287 (1929) | #445 |
| 1930s | 8,215 | #185 (1938) | #213 |
| 1940s | 13,090 | #171 (1944) | #181 |
| 1950s | 19,303 | #152 (1958) | #180 |
| 1960s | 25,894 | #112 (1961) | #159 |
| 1970s | 9,304 | #230 (1970) | #280 |
| 1980s | 6,047 | #320 (1982) | #386 |
| 1990s | 2,844 | #523 (1990) | #800 |
| 2000s | 1,386 | #1,224 (2002) | #1,504 |
| 2010s | 991 | #1,592 (2011) | #2,018 |
| 2020s | 475 | #2,153 (2025) | #2,303 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jackie in 1951
Top girls' names in 1951
Top boys' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 1,228 of them was named Jackie, which outranked 96.8% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,882,837 boys got a published name in 1951; 1 in 917 of them was named Jackie, which outranked 96.9% of the 4,253 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.