Jacie
#3,130 for girls in 2025, 51 births · Last seen for boys in 2007 at #12,367
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 212 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,230since 1920
Jacie over time
Rank among girls' names. Jacie has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,130 | 51 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,013 | 54 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,014 | 55 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,313 | 48 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,751 | 62 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,752 | 61 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,107 | 52 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,530 | 70 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,269 | 84 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,937 | 104 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,868 | 108 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,689 | 124 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,189 | 86 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,909 | 104 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,468 | 154 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,687 | 132 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,508 | 154 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,381 | 175 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #1,257 | 191 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,115 | 212 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,294 | 165 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,284 | 162 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,268 | 155 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,540 | 120 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,369 | 136 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,336 | 133 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,366 | 126 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,514 | 107 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,767 | 84 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,982 | 69 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,167 | 62 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,776 | 82 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,928 | 72 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,189 | 60 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,737 | 42 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,618 | 43 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,646 | 40 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,257 | 28 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,539 | 17 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,328 | 26 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,851 | 31 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,659 | 33 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,761 | 19 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,052 | 23 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,863 | 16 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,787 | 16 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jacie! It came in at #4,975, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1920–1959, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Jacie
- 117 spots since 2024 (#3,013 → #3,130)
- 448 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #3,130)
- 1,193 spots since 2015 (#1,937 → #3,130)
- Debuted 1920
- Peaked 2005 at #1,115 (212 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 8,716 girls born in 2005 were named Jacie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 31,515 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 37.9% of all girls named Jacie (1,602) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 10 | #4,975 (1920) | #5,037 |
| 1930s | 5 | #4,181 (1936) | #4,181 |
| 1940s | 5 | #5,295 (1947) | #5,295 |
| 1950s | 10 | #5,952 (1956) | #6,099 |
| 1960s | 52 | #4,019 (1963) | #5,301 |
| 1970s | 155 | #3,052 (1975) | #4,361 |
| 1980s | 275 | #2,618 (1989) | #3,456 |
| 1990s | 837 | #1,336 (1999) | #1,876 |
| 2000s | 1,602 | #1,115 (2005) | #1,370 |
| 2010s | 947 | #1,468 (2010) | #2,172 |
| 2020s | 332 | #2,682 (2020) | #2,984 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jacie in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
Top boys' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 10,986 of them was named Jacie, which outranked 93.3% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
2,075,414 boys got a published name in 2007; 1 in 415,083 of them was named Jacie, which outranked 14.1% of the 14,394 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,027 names at #12,367; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.