Izaiah
Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902 · #635 for boys in 2025, 439 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2011 · 727 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 14,899since 1984
Izaiah over time
Rank among boys' names. Izaiah has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #635 | 439 | |
| 2024 | — | #608 | 468 | |
| 2023 | — | #580 | 495 | |
| 2022 | — | #539 | 551 | |
| 2021 | — | #555 | 514 | |
| 2020 | — | #488 | 602 | |
| 2019 | — | #555 | 509 | |
| 2018 | — | #520 | 546 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #556 | 491 |
| 2016 | — | #551 | 520 | |
| 2015 | — | #538 | 532 | |
| 2014 | — | #461 | 637 | |
| 2013 | — | #445 | 647 | |
| 2012 | — | #400 | 729 | |
| 2011 | — | #390 | 727 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #400 | 703 |
| 2009 | — | #400 | 744 | |
| 2008 | — | #427 | 679 | |
| 2007 | — | #441 | 635 | |
| 2006 | — | #460 | 589 | |
| 2005 | — | #469 | 534 | |
| 2004 | — | #539 | 438 | |
| 2003 | — | #541 | 426 | |
| 2002 | — | #565 | 394 | |
| 2001 | — | #595 | 334 | |
| 2000 | — | #657 | 274 | |
| 1999 | — | #771 | 206 | |
| 1998 | — | #853 | 171 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,116 | 113 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,359 | 79 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,914 | 44 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,392 | 32 | |
| 1993 | — | #3,141 | 21 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,459 | 18 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,828 | 23 | |
| 1990 | — | #5,823 | 8 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,615 | 8 | |
| 1988 | — | #7,270 | 5 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #4,215 | 9 | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Izaiah! It came in at #4,215, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1988, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Izaiah is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#183 · 1 in 668
- Arizona#235 · 1 in 1,036
- Connecticut#257 · 1 in 1,467
- California#292 · 1 in 1,732
- Colorado#297 · 1 in 1,310
Best ever in a state: #142 in New Mexico, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #183 | 15 | 1 in 668 |
| Arizona | #235 | 36 | 1 in 1,036 |
| Connecticut | #257 | 10 | 1 in 1,467 |
| California | #292 | 135 | 1 in 1,732 |
| Colorado | #297 | 21 | 1 in 1,310 |
| Massachusetts | #300 | 16 | 1 in 1,876 |
| Texas | #330 | 98 | 1 in 1,823 |
| Florida | #333 | 45 | 1 in 2,059 |
| Idaho | #335 | 6 | 1 in 1,400 |
| Oklahoma | #379 | 11 | 1 in 1,870 |
| Michigan | #385 | 21 | 1 in 2,295 |
| North Carolina | #397 | 21 | 1 in 2,455 |
| Nevada | #406 | 6 | 1 in 2,279 |
| Kentucky | #434 | 8 | 1 in 2,810 |
| Ohio | #435 | 20 | 1 in 3,026 |
| Minnesota | #442 | 10 | 1 in 2,771 |
| Utah | #447 | 9 | 1 in 2,452 |
| Illinois | #464 | 24 | 1 in 2,910 |
| Washington | #469 | 13 | 1 in 2,737 |
| Virginia | #477 | 13 | 1 in 3,197 |
| Kansas | #483 | 6 | 1 in 2,727 |
| Tennessee | #502 | 11 | 1 in 3,196 |
| Georgia | #503 | 18 | 1 in 3,105 |
| New Jersey | #521 | 12 | 1 in 3,567 |
| Indiana | #548 | 10 | 1 in 3,615 |
| Missouri | #550 | 9 | 1 in 3,630 |
| New York | #557 | 27 | 1 in 3,935 |
| Wisconsin | #573 | 7 | 1 in 3,966 |
| Pennsylvania | #596 | 13 | 1 in 4,692 |
| Maryland | #654 | 6 | 1 in 4,700 |
| South Carolina | #654 | 5 | 1 in 4,210 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Izaiah
- 27 spots since 2024 (#608 → #635)
- 147 spots since 2020 (#488 → #635)
- 97 spots since 2015 (#538 → #635)
- Biggest jump: 263 spots in 1998 (#1,116 → #853)
- Biggest drop: 77 spots in 2015 (#461 → #538)
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2011 at #390 (727 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,602 boys born in 2012 were named Izaiah (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,891 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #390 in 2011, was only 1 in 2,612 (0.04%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 40.5% of all boys named Izaiah (6,041) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 27 | #4,215 (1984) | #5,955 |
| 1990s | 715 | #771 (1999) | #2,366 |
| 2000s | 5,047 | #400 (2009) | #509 |
| 2010s | 6,041 | #390 (2011) | #482 |
| 2020s | 3,069 | #488 (2020) | #568 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Izaiah in 2010
Top girls' names in 2010
Top boys' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 355,519 of them was named Izaiah, which outranked 14.4% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,918,676 boys got a published name in 2010; 1 in 2,729 of them was named Izaiah, which outranked 97.2% of the 14,270 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.