Isaac
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births · #47 for boys in 2025, 5,953 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2013 · 10,134 births
- Debut · boys
- 274 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 45 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 331,508since 1880
Isaac over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | #47 | 5,953 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #41 | 6,529 |
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | #42 | 6,621 |
| 2022 | — | #41 | 6,752 | |
| 2021 | — | #40 | 6,987 | |
| 2020 | #11,090 | 8 | #39 | 7,155 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #34 | 8,231 |
| 2018 | #10,545 | 9 | #34 | 8,503 |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 | #32 | 8,894 |
| 2016 | #7,602 | 15 | #31 | 9,782 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #31 | 9,988 |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | #31 | 9,999 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #28 | 10,134 |
| 2012 | #9,711 | 11 | #30 | 10,065 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #35 | 9,607 |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #39 | 9,371 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #40 | 9,569 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 | #37 | 10,030 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #41 | 10,274 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #48 | 9,685 |
| 2005 | #5,800 | 21 | #49 | 9,127 |
| 2004 | #3,566 | 41 | #46 | 9,181 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | #48 | 8,944 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #48 | 8,312 |
| 2001 | #6,956 | 15 | #47 | 8,200 |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | #53 | 7,439 |
| 1999 | #5,896 | 17 | #64 | 6,407 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #65 | 5,859 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #73 | 5,146 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #86 | 4,566 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #98 | 3,881 |
| 1994 | #6,319 | 14 | #103 | 3,496 |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 | #110 | 3,214 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #123 | 2,773 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #130 | 2,500 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #132 | 2,429 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #137 | 2,210 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #143 | 1,964 |
| 1987 | #4,474 | 18 | #151 | 1,828 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #155 | 1,736 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #165 | 1,673 |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | #160 | 1,692 |
| 1983 | #4,686 | 15 | #151 | 1,796 |
| 1982 | #3,647 | 22 | #151 | 1,841 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #150 | 1,836 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | #150 | 1,798 |
| 1979 | #4,842 | 14 | #151 | 1,734 |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | #167 | 1,451 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 | #184 | 1,264 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #202 | 1,093 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #213 | 1,014 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #223 | 941 |
| 1973 | — | #235 | 896 | |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #251 | 806 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #288 | 712 |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | #332 | 569 |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | #349 | 514 |
| 1968 | — | #375 | 427 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #377 | 395 |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | #362 | 430 |
| 1965 | — | #375 | 428 | |
| 1964 | — | #352 | 496 | |
| 1963 | — | #359 | 472 | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #363 | 482 |
| 1961 | — | #357 | 494 | |
| 1960 | — | #365 | 467 | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #342 | 513 |
| 1958 | — | #332 | 540 | |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #334 | 521 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #317 | 552 |
| 1955 | — | #314 | 545 | |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #295 | 585 |
| 1953 | — | #301 | 548 | |
| 1952 | — | #294 | 564 | |
| 1951 | #4,833 | 6 | #292 | 554 |
| 1950 | — | #282 | 557 | |
| 1949 | — | #270 | 599 | |
| 1948 | — | #298 | 533 | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #280 | 599 |
| 1946 | #3,217 | 10 | #285 | 514 |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #281 | 460 |
| 1944 | — | #269 | 491 | |
| 1943 | — | #279 | 481 | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | #283 | 450 |
| 1941 | — | #265 | 451 | |
| 1940 | — | #246 | 486 | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #248 | 465 |
| 1938 | — | #253 | 460 | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #255 | 447 |
| 1936 | — | #261 | 423 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #241 | 476 |
| 1934 | — | #237 | 481 | |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | #237 | 480 |
| 1932 | — | #240 | 492 | |
| 1931 | — | #256 | 443 | |
| 1930 | — | #230 | 548 | |
| 1929 | — | #218 | 585 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #241 | 534 |
| 1927 | — | #203 | 693 | |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #228 | 586 |
| 1925 | #4,426 | 6 | #206 | 678 |
| 1924 | — | #199 | 704 | |
| 1923 | — | #197 | 698 | |
| 1922 | — | #190 | 720 | |
| 1921 | — | #208 | 648 | |
| 1920 | — | #190 | 706 | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #178 | 737 |
| 1918 | — | #194 | 658 | |
| 1917 | — | #192 | 622 | |
| 1916 | — | #186 | 629 | |
| 1915 | — | #195 | 568 | |
| 1914 | — | #177 | 496 | |
| 1913 | — | #172 | 398 | |
| 1912 | — | #162 | 359 | |
| 1911 | — | #143 | 233 | |
| 1910 | — | #130 | 252 | |
| 1909 | — | #128 | 209 | |
| 1908 | — | #145 | 162 | |
| 1907 | — | #133 | 178 | |
| 1906 | — | #128 | 163 | |
| 1905 | — | #144 | 147 | |
| 1904 | — | #126 | 167 | |
| 1903 | — | #135 | 138 | |
| 1902 | — | #135 | 143 | |
| 1901 | — | #124 | 133 | |
| 1900 | — | #116 | 198 | |
| 1899 | — | #119 | 139 | |
| 1898 | — | #117 | 156 | |
| 1897 | — | #101 | 175 | |
| 1896 | — | #100 | 191 | |
| 1895 | — | #107 | 172 | |
| 1894 | — | #105 | 170 | |
| 1893 | — | #97 | 182 | |
| 1892 | — | #94 | 203 | |
| 1891 | — | #101 | 160 | |
| 1890 | — | #92 | 187 | |
| 1889 | — | #91 | 188 | |
| 1888 | — | #85 | 221 | |
| 1887 | — | #83 | 194 | |
| 1886 | — | #78 | 224 | |
| 1885 | — | #79 | 204 | |
| 1884 | — | #75 | 243 | |
| 1883 | — | #70 | 227 | |
| 1882 | — | #65 | 278 | |
| 1881 | — | #64 | 258 | |
| 1880 | — | #62 | 274 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Isaac was already there! It came in at #62, and was given to 274 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1893–1908, when fewer than 200 boys a year got the name.
Where Isaac is popular in 1989
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#55 · 1 in 211
- Hawaii#74 · 1 in 300
- Vermont#90 · 1 in 428
- Alaska#97 · 1 in 396
- Oregon#99 · 1 in 486
Best ever in a state: #4 in Idaho, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #55 | 55 | 1 in 211 |
| Hawaii | #74 | 23 | 1 in 300 |
| Vermont | #90 | 8 | 1 in 428 |
| Alaska | #97 | 11 | 1 in 396 |
| Oregon | #99 | 40 | 1 in 486 |
| Minnesota | #101 | 55 | 1 in 574 |
| Colorado | #103 | 46 | 1 in 526 |
| Maine | #105 | 13 | 1 in 587 |
| Arizona | #108 | 58 | 1 in 522 |
| Iowa | #111 | 30 | 1 in 608 |
| Texas | #112 | 285 | 1 in 520 |
| Utah | #112 | 29 | 1 in 571 |
| Rhode Island | #113 | 9 | 1 in 728 |
| Montana | #114 | 9 | 1 in 512 |
| Idaho | #115 | 12 | 1 in 557 |
| Nebraska | #117 | 17 | 1 in 647 |
| West Virginia | #118 | 15 | 1 in 684 |
| North Dakota | #119 | 8 | 1 in 579 |
| New Hampshire | #122 | 9 | 1 in 888 |
| Delaware | #125 | 6 | 1 in 783 |
| Washington | #127 | 48 | 1 in 708 |
| Indiana | #129 | 51 | 1 in 777 |
| South Dakota | #129 | 7 | 1 in 669 |
| Wisconsin | #139 | 35 | 1 in 946 |
| Kentucky | #143 | 23 | 1 in 1,063 |
| Pennsylvania | #143 | 73 | 1 in 1,115 |
| California | #144 | 385 | 1 in 698 |
| Missouri | #144 | 38 | 1 in 993 |
| New York | #144 | 138 | 1 in 978 |
| Ohio | #150 | 69 | 1 in 1,132 |
| Kansas | #155 | 18 | 1 in 947 |
| North Carolina | #156 | 45 | 1 in 1,028 |
| Tennessee | #162 | 33 | 1 in 1,050 |
| Oklahoma | #163 | 21 | 1 in 979 |
| Virginia | #163 | 37 | 1 in 1,131 |
| Massachusetts | #169 | 30 | 1 in 1,459 |
| Arkansas | #175 | 15 | 1 in 1,023 |
| Michigan | #176 | 57 | 1 in 1,218 |
| South Carolina | #184 | 23 | 1 in 1,025 |
| Illinois | #195 | 71 | 1 in 1,222 |
| New Jersey | #198 | 38 | 1 in 1,450 |
| Georgia | #201 | 41 | 1 in 1,206 |
| Florida | #210 | 71 | 1 in 1,258 |
| Mississippi | #212 | 15 | 1 in 1,144 |
| Maryland | #216 | 20 | 1 in 1,604 |
| Connecticut | #219 | 12 | 1 in 1,846 |
| Alabama | #228 | 18 | 1 in 1,502 |
| District of Columbia | #256 | 12 | 1 in 1,095 |
| Louisiana | #265 | 21 | 1 in 1,520 |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Isaac
- 6 spots since 2024 (#41 → #47)
- 8 spots since 2020 (#39 → #47)
- 16 spots since 2015 (#31 → #47)
- Biggest jump: 44 spots in 1971 (#332 → #288)
- Biggest drop: 38 spots in 1928 (#203 → #241)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2013 at #28 (10,134 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 45 yrs · run 1995–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 187 boys born in 2013 were named Isaac (0.54%)
- Latest: 1 in 287 boys born in 2025 (0.35%)
- 28.5% of all boys named Isaac (94,574) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #62 (1880) → #377 (1967) → #28 (2013)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,311 | #62 (1880) | #75 |
| 1890s | 1,735 | #92 (1890) | #103 |
| 1900s | 1,638 | #116 (1900) | #131 |
| 1910s | 4,952 | #130 (1910) | #173 |
| 1920s | 6,552 | #190 (1922) | #208 |
| 1930s | 4,715 | #230 (1930) | #246 |
| 1940s | 5,064 | #246 (1940) | #276 |
| 1950s | 5,479 | #282 (1950) | #310 |
| 1960s | 4,605 | #349 (1969) | #363 |
| 1970s | 10,480 | #151 (1979) | #225 |
| 1980s | 18,374 | #137 (1989) | #151 |
| 1990s | 40,271 | #64 (1999) | #98 |
| 2000s | 90,761 | #37 (2008) | #46 |
| 2010s | 94,574 | #28 (2013) | #33 |
| 2020s | 39,997 | #39 (2020) | #42 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Isaac in 1989
Top girls' names in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
girls
1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 230,444 of them was named Isaac, which outranked 39.8% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,037Zenab9
- #8,037Zita9
- #8,037Zohra9
- #8,761Isaac8
- #8,761Aariel8
- #8,761Abeer8
- #8,761Abel8
- #9,681Aarica7
- #9,681Abbagail7
- #9,681Abbee7
Tied with 919 names at #8,761; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 905 of them was named Isaac, which outranked 98.5% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).