Hattie
#334 for girls in 2025, 923 births · Last seen for boys in 1959 at #3,988
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 769 births
- Debut · girls
- 769 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 35 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 105,197since 1880
Hattie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #334 | 923 | — | |
| 2024 | #383 | 820 | — | |
| 2023 | #384 | 804 | — | |
| 2022 | #412 | 763 | — | |
| 2021 | #459 | 684 | — | |
| 2020 | #421 | 725 | — | |
| 2019 | #451 | 691 | — | |
| 2018 | #495 | 628 | — | |
| 2017 | #477 | 654 | — | |
| 2016 | #505 | 620 | — | |
| 2015 | #488 | 657 | — | |
| 2014 | #590 | 502 | — | |
| 2013 | #568 | 510 | — | |
| 2012 | #706 | 398 | — | |
| 2011 | #994 | 255 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,438 | 158 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,769 | 123 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,531 | 151 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,588 | 142 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,639 | 129 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,645 | 121 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,756 | 109 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,552 | 124 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,510 | 125 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,468 | 128 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,518 | 120 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,688 | 97 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,587 | 103 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,845 | 80 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,503 | 107 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,101 | 64 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,862 | 76 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,176 | 61 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,987 | 69 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,832 | 77 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,201 | 58 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,839 | 67 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,962 | 57 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,932 | 57 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,975 | 55 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,788 | 60 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,858 | 56 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,551 | 76 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,528 | 78 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,542 | 76 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,712 | 64 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,546 | 71 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,761 | 58 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,523 | 67 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,447 | 71 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,260 | 86 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,293 | 79 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,192 | 90 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,187 | 96 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,191 | 96 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,024 | 113 | — | |
| 1968 | #991 | 111 | — | |
| 1967 | #967 | 112 | — | |
| 1966 | #890 | 127 | — | |
| 1965 | #771 | 165 | — | |
| 1964 | #780 | 175 | — | |
| 1963 | #695 | 212 | — | |
| 1962 | #661 | 236 | — | |
| 1961 | #655 | 245 | — | |
| 1960 | #584 | 287 | — | |
| 1959 | #577 | 291 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #556 | 308 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #529 | 327 | — | |
| 1956 | #474 | 390 | — | |
| 1955 | #432 | 421 | — | |
| 1954 | #415 | 436 | — | |
| 1953 | #381 | 504 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #349 | 554 | — | |
| 1951 | #330 | 576 | — | |
| 1950 | #306 | 643 | — | |
| 1949 | #287 | 723 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #278 | 754 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #275 | 779 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #266 | 739 | — | |
| 1945 | #247 | 744 | — | |
| 1944 | #239 | 754 | #2,862 | 7 |
| 1943 | #236 | 821 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #242 | 785 | #1,946 | 14 |
| 1941 | #208 | 853 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #198 | 893 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #195 | 912 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #198 | 919 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #193 | 931 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #192 | 938 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #182 | 976 | #1,929 | 14 |
| 1934 | #175 | 1,067 | #2,121 | 12 |
| 1933 | #167 | 1,086 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #178 | 1,059 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #175 | 1,057 | #2,101 | 13 |
| 1930 | #160 | 1,284 | #2,444 | 11 |
| 1929 | #164 | 1,261 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #159 | 1,375 | #2,659 | 10 |
| 1927 | #156 | 1,508 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1926 | #151 | 1,601 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1925 | #148 | 1,738 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #149 | 1,759 | #2,822 | 10 |
| 1923 | #147 | 1,700 | #3,175 | 8 |
| 1922 | #139 | 1,780 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #144 | 1,776 | #3,214 | 8 |
| 1920 | #132 | 1,870 | #2,231 | 14 |
| 1919 | #125 | 1,896 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #121 | 1,999 | #3,368 | 7 |
| 1917 | #118 | 1,858 | #2,091 | 14 |
| 1916 | #115 | 1,889 | — | |
| 1915 | #113 | 1,825 | #2,621 | 9 |
| 1914 | #97 | 1,678 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #96 | 1,434 | — | |
| 1912 | #90 | 1,389 | #1,746 | 9 |
| 1911 | #86 | 1,136 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | #73 | 1,314 | — | |
| 1909 | #75 | 1,134 | — | |
| 1908 | #71 | 1,137 | #1,217 | 6 |
| 1907 | #71 | 1,142 | #999 | 8 |
| 1906 | #71 | 1,056 | #927 | 8 |
| 1905 | #62 | 1,197 | #919 | 8 |
| 1904 | #64 | 1,123 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #60 | 1,106 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #57 | 1,163 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #56 | 1,106 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #50 | 1,553 | #1,050 | 7 |
| 1899 | #53 | 1,087 | #661 | 10 |
| 1898 | #48 | 1,328 | #744 | 9 |
| 1897 | #48 | 1,251 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #47 | 1,320 | — | |
| 1895 | #46 | 1,338 | #795 | 8 |
| 1894 | #44 | 1,325 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #43 | 1,315 | #615 | 11 |
| 1892 | #40 | 1,363 | #861 | 7 |
| 1891 | #41 | 1,219 | #700 | 8 |
| 1890 | #38 | 1,363 | #739 | 8 |
| 1889 | #35 | 1,328 | — | |
| 1888 | #36 | 1,298 | — | |
| 1887 | #32 | 1,135 | #819 | 6 |
| 1886 | #33 | 1,139 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #36 | 1,008 | — | |
| 1884 | #32 | 993 | — | |
| 1883 | #28 | 895 | — | |
| 1882 | #30 | 859 | — | |
| 1881 | #28 | 775 | — | |
| 1880 | #27 | 769 | #809 | 6 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hattie was already there! It came in at #27, and was given to 769 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1975–1995, when fewer than 79 girls a year got the name.
Where Hattie is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#17 · 1 in 95
- Mississippi#24 · 1 in 122
- Alabama#36 · 1 in 152
- North Carolina#42 · 1 in 167
- Georgia#44 · 1 in 159
Best ever in a state: #11 in Mississippi, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #17 | 184 | 1 in 95 |
| Mississippi | #24 | 136 | 1 in 122 |
| Alabama | #36 | 153 | 1 in 152 |
| North Carolina | #42 | 173 | 1 in 167 |
| Georgia | #44 | 183 | 1 in 159 |
| Tennessee | #54 | 92 | 1 in 233 |
| Florida | #58 | 42 | 1 in 200 |
| Virginia | #60 | 106 | 1 in 217 |
| Louisiana | #70 | 68 | 1 in 247 |
| Arkansas | #87 | 51 | 1 in 304 |
| Kentucky | #90 | 64 | 1 in 369 |
| Texas | #90 | 109 | 1 in 396 |
| Maryland | #107 | 22 | 1 in 545 |
| West Virginia | #137 | 24 | 1 in 616 |
| Oklahoma | #143 | 30 | 1 in 560 |
| Missouri | #145 | 37 | 1 in 714 |
| Michigan | #164 | 29 | 1 in 959 |
| South Dakota | #168 | 6 | 1 in 843 |
| North Dakota | #169 | 7 | 1 in 953 |
| Minnesota | #180 | 18 | 1 in 1,103 |
| Nebraska | #186 | 10 | 1 in 1,047 |
| Wisconsin | #190 | 17 | 1 in 1,246 |
| Kansas | #191 | 12 | 1 in 1,113 |
| New Jersey | #196 | 18 | 1 in 1,506 |
| Iowa | #197 | 15 | 1 in 1,266 |
| Maine | #197 | 6 | 1 in 957 |
| Pennsylvania | #199 | 50 | 1 in 1,745 |
| Illinois | #207 | 34 | 1 in 1,567 |
| Ohio | #207 | 29 | 1 in 1,574 |
| Indiana | #219 | 14 | 1 in 1,632 |
| California | #264 | 9 | 1 in 2,071 |
| New York | #266 | 33 | 1 in 2,774 |
| Massachusetts | #327 | 7 | 1 in 4,640 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hattie
- 49 spots since 2024 (#383 → #334)
- 87 spots since 2020 (#421 → #334)
- 154 spots since 2015 (#488 → #334)
- Biggest jump: 444 spots in 2011 (#1,438 → #994)
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 1966 (#771 → #890)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #27 (769 births)
- Births halved by 1957, 77 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1880–1914
- Top 1,000: 104 yrs · run 1880–1968
- Highest: 1 in 118 girls born in 1880 were named Hattie (0.85%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,741 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
- 15.6% of all girls named Hattie (16,418) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 10,199 | #27 (1880) | #32 |
| 1890s | 12,909 | #38 (1890) | #45 |
| 1900s | 11,717 | #50 (1900) | #64 |
| 1910s | 16,418 | #73 (1910) | #103 |
| 1920s | 16,368 | #132 (1920) | #149 |
| 1930s | 10,229 | #160 (1930) | #182 |
| 1940s | 7,845 | #198 (1940) | #248 |
| 1950s | 4,450 | #306 (1950) | #435 |
| 1960s | 1,783 | #584 (1960) | #802 |
| 1970s | 778 | #1,187 (1971) | #1,411 |
| 1980s | 645 | #1,528 (1981) | #1,797 |
| 1990s | 792 | #1,503 (1996) | #1,878 |
| 2000s | 1,272 | #1,468 (2001) | #1,598 |
| 2010s | 5,073 | #451 (2019) | #671 |
| 2020s | 4,719 | #334 (2025) | #399 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hattie in 1915
Top girls' names in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
girls
983,852 girls got a published name in 1915; 1 in 539 of them was named Hattie, which outranked 97.7% of the 4,967 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 94,286 of them was named Hattie, which outranked 40.3% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,458Zigmont10
- #2,458Zollie10
- #2,458Zygmond10
- #2,621Hattie9
- #2,621Ada9
- #2,621Alanson9
- #2,621Albertus9
- #2,829Abdon8
- #2,829Abie8
- #2,829Acel8
Tied with 207 names at #2,621; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.