Hartley
#1,452 for girls in 2025, 148 births · #4,050 for boys in 2025, 26 births
Given to girls 58.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 148 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,219since 1984
Hartley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,452 | 148 | #4,050 | 26 |
| 2024 | #1,472 | 148 | #3,896 | 28 |
| 2023 | #1,603 | 130 | #3,802 | 29 |
| 2022 | #1,828 | 111 | #4,303 | 24 |
| 2021 | #1,780 | 114 | #4,780 | 20 |
| 2020 | #1,924 | 99 | #4,698 | 20 |
| 2019 | #1,655 | 127 | #6,104 | 14 |
| 2018 | #1,595 | 134 | #3,607 | 30 |
| 2017 | #1,534 | 143 | #5,526 | 16 |
| 2016 | #1,560 | 143 | #5,789 | 15 |
| 2015 | #1,609 | 133 | #4,407 | 22 |
| 2014 | #1,757 | 118 | #3,891 | 26 |
| 2013 | #1,660 | 128 | #4,463 | 21 |
| 2012 | #1,940 | 101 | #5,482 | 16 |
| 2011 | #2,000 | 98 | #5,675 | 15 |
| 2010 | #2,202 | 88 | #4,848 | 19 |
| 2009 | #4,571 | 32 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #5,279 | 27 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #7,891 | 14 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #6,489 | 18 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #6,956 | 15 | — | |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | — | #6,843 | 8 | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | — | |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #5,942 | 8 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #4,234 | 9 | |
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | — | #5,525 | 6 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | #4,935 | 6 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #5,101 | 5 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,986 | 5 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,549 | 12 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,365 | 7 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,627 | 10 | |
| 1965 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,858 | 9 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | #2,900 | 9 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #2,370 | 12 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,631 | 10 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,361 | 12 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,452 | 6 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,958 | 16 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,875 | 8 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,972 | 15 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,438 | 10 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,667 | 20 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,027 | 14 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,599 | 22 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,030 | 13 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,445 | 21 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,630 | 18 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,529 | 21 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,730 | 17 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,276 | 27 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,894 | 14 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,795 | 15 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,439 | 22 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,481 | 21 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,587 | 18 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,538 | 20 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,725 | 17 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,361 | 24 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,216 | 31 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,361 | 26 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,190 | 35 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,523 | 23 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,270 | 13 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,227 | 35 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,720 | 20 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,304 | 31 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,458 | 27 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,322 | 30 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,434 | 27 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,267 | 33 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,300 | 31 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,351 | 28 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,152 | 36 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,479 | 23 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,594 | 20 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,241 | 28 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,300 | 21 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,803 | 10 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,417 | 12 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | #951 | 10 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,373 | 5 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | #685 | 10 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #956 | 6 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Hartley! It came in at #9,144, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1988, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Hartley is popular in 1909
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Hartley
- 20 spots since 2024 (#1,472 → #1,452)
- 472 spots since 2020 (#1,924 → #1,452)
- 157 spots since 2015 (#1,609 → #1,452)
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2025 at #1,452 (148 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 10,860 girls born in 2025 were named Hartley (0.01%)
- 54.7% of all girls named Hartley (1,213) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1998, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 13 | #9,144 (1984) | #9,413 |
| 1990s | 74 | #8,079 (1995) | #9,749 |
| 2000s | 169 | #4,571 (2009) | #7,520 |
| 2010s | 1,213 | #1,534 (2017) | #1,751 |
| 2020s | 750 | #1,452 (2025) | #1,677 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hartley in 1909
Top boys' names in 1909
More about 1909
boys
163,996 boys got a published name in 1909; 1 in 16,400 of them was named Hartley, which outranked 43.4% of the 1,679 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).