Harriet

#1,071 for girls in 2025, 226 births · Last seen for boys in 1956 at #3,942
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 319 births
Debut · girls
319 births
In top 100 · girls
10 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
90,306
since 1880

Harriet over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202013peak #73, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,071226—
2024#1,149210—
2023#1,129215—
2022#1,129218—
2021#1,056239—
2020#1,074230—
2019#988261—
2018#1,039248—
2017#1,165211—
2016#1,353175—
2015#1,307182—
2014#1,624132—
2013#1,646129—
2012#2,13289—
2011#2,17387—
2010#3,01056—
2009#3,08855—
2008#4,26836—
2007#2,93061—
2006#2,85061—
2005#3,40444—
2004#4,38731—
2003#3,34743—
2002#3,52338—
2001#3,19843—
2000#3,52737—
1999#3,56934—
1998#2,84646—
1997#3,71630—
1996#3,30235—
1995#3,15236—
1994#3,61530—
1993#3,87727—
1992#2,83042—
1991#3,54030—
1990#3,15635—
1989#2,65842—
1988#3,16531—
1987#2,61238—
1986#2,42041—
1985#2,22246—
1984#2,38240—
1983#2,09747—
1982#1,78661—
1981#2,06150—
1980#1,88657—
1979#2,11247—
1978#1,72960—
1977#1,60966—
1976#1,63860—
1975#1,38176—
1974#1,16597—
1973#1,33975—
1972#1,16992—
1971#1,098109—
1970#819169—
1969#832154—
1968#846145—
1967#635227—
1966#675207—
1965#559290—
1964#595278—
1963#518351—
1962#492387—
1961#468434—
1960#451470—
1959#418513—
1958#411512—
1957#386559—
1956#360590#3,9425
1955#327693—
1954#314721—
1953#293801—
1952#270882—
1951#251924—
1950#246934—
1949#2251,102—
1948#2191,116#3,6685
1947#2011,324—
1946#1901,299#2,9197
1945#1761,175—
1944#1691,263#3,1096
1943#1651,444—
1942#1621,443—
1941#1581,396—
1940#1571,363—
1939#1561,390—
1938#1581,375—
1937#1531,421#3,5185
1936#1541,332#2,8547
1935#1571,294—
1934#1561,280#3,2776
1933#1521,236—
1932#1491,351—
1931#1431,415—
1930#1381,598#3,0228
1929#1351,697#2,45211
1928#1331,785#2,8439
1927#1321,965#2,70310
1926#1331,986#3,7086
1925#1312,067—
1924#1282,189—
1923#1222,198#3,4677
1922#1172,237#4,3075
1921#1142,389#3,8696
1920#1122,360—
1919#1132,168—
1918#1062,345—
1917#1042,203—
1916#1062,067#2,9268
1915#1121,849—
1914#1111,455—
1913#1251,039—
1912#1131,043—
1911#115792—
1910#126637—
1909#135527#1,4405
1908#126548#1,3735
1907#138477—
1906#127497—
1905#144413—
1904#132448—
1903#134416—
1902#140399—
1901#123414—
1900#134461—
1899#113431—
1898#110491—
1897#128383—
1896#110437—
1895#113435—
1894#114411—
1893#105428—
1892#111402—
1891#111354—
1890#102399—
1889#99397—
1888#99389—
1887#94342—
1886#99341—
1885#89342—
1884#91339—
1883#82341—
1882#90289—
1881#85270—
1880#73319—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Harriet was already there! It came in at #73, and was given to 319 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1993–1997, when fewer than 37 girls a year got the name.

Where Harriet is popular in 2013

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNHWashington: #1,041 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,964 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #280 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,208 girlsMNIllinois: #969 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,795 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMINew York: #1,107 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 7,020 girlsNYMassachusetts: #551 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,820 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedRIOregon: #557 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,503 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedINOhio: #1,458 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,519 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,919 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 17,097 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Minnesota#280 · 1 in 1,208
  2. Massachusetts#551 · 1 in 2,820
  3. Oregon#557 · 1 in 2,503
  4. Illinois#969 · 1 in 5,795
  5. Washington#1,041 · 1 in 5,964

Best ever in a state: #23 in Hawaii, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Minnesota#280201 in 1,208
Massachusetts#55191 in 2,820
Oregon#55761 in 2,503
Illinois#969101 in 5,795
Washington#1,04151 in 5,964
New York#1,107131 in 7,020
Ohio#1,45851 in 10,519
California#1,919121 in 17,097
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Harriet
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 78 spots since 2024 (#1,149 → #1,071)
  • 3 spots since 2020 (#1,074 → #1,071)
  • 236 spots since 2015 (#1,307 → #1,071)
  • Biggest jump: 51 spots in 2019 (#1,039 → #988)
  • Biggest drop: 279 spots in 1971 (#819 → #1,098)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #73 (319 births)
  • Births halved by 1968, 88 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 10 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 10 yrs · run 1880–1889
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1880–1970
Share of babies · girls
1 in 285
  • Highest: 1 in 285 girls born in 1880 were named Harriet (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 7,112 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 23.1% of all girls named Harriet (20,873) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s3,369#73 (1880)#90
1890s4,171#102 (1890)#112
1900s4,600#123 (1901)#133
1910s15,598#104 (1917)#113
1920s20,873#112 (1920)#126
1930s13,692#138 (1930)#152
1940s12,925#157 (1940)#182
1950s7,129#246 (1950)#328
1960s2,943#451 (1960)#607
1970s851#819 (1970)#1,406
1980s453#1,786 (1982)#2,329
1990s345#2,830 (1992)#3,360
2000s449#2,850 (2006)#3,452
2010s1,570#988 (2019)#1,644
2020s1,338#1,056 (2021)#1,101

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Harriet in 2013

girls
#1,646
129 births · 1 in 13,603 girls

Top girls' names in 2013

  1. #1Sophia21,255
  2. #2Emma20,973
  3. #3Olivia18,454
  4. #4Isabella17,689
  5. #5Ava15,271
  6. #6Mia13,166
  7. #7Emily13,144
  8. #8Abigail12,429
  9. #9Madison10,605
  10. #10Elizabeth9,476
  11. #1,646Harriet129
More about 2013

girls

1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 13,603 of them was named Harriet, which outranked 91.5% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Harriet
  1. #1,642Shanaya130
  2. #1,642Susana130
  3. #1,642Taelyn130
  4. #1,646Harriet129
  5. #1,646Abygail129
  6. #1,646August129
  7. #1,646Emelyn129
  8. #1,660Addalynn128
  9. #1,660Dior128
  10. #1,660Gisele128

Tied with 13 names at #1,646; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2012
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,124Daleyza#3,711 → #587
  2. ↑ 736Marjorie#1,646 → #910
  3. ↑ 683Lennon#1,612 → #929
  4. ↑ 561Jurnee#1,457 → #896
  5. ↑ 539Everleigh#1,405 → #866
Fallers
  1. ↓ 827Litzy#598 → #1,425
  2. ↓ 409Geraldine#994 → #1,403
  3. ↓ 384Taraji#858 → #1,242
  4. ↓ 374Marisa#977 → #1,351
  5. ↓ 372Adley#733 → #1,105

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2013 →