Graciela
#1,833 for girls in 2025, 109 births · Last seen for boys in 1995 at #8,868
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 428 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 16,315since 1916
Graciela over time
Rank among girls' names. Graciela has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,833 | 109 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,942 | 102 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,907 | 105 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,885 | 105 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,860 | 104 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,629 | 130 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,710 | 121 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,902 | 106 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,884 | 108 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,814 | 115 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,634 | 131 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,529 | 143 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,452 | 157 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,577 | 138 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,274 | 187 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,132 | 223 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,157 | 222 | — | |
| 2007 | #976 | 275 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,074 | 237 | — | |
| 2005 | #901 | 278 | — | |
| 2004 | #855 | 287 | — | |
| 2003 | #869 | 276 | — | |
| 2002 | #931 | 241 | — | |
| 2001 | #834 | 275 | — | |
| 2000 | #811 | 279 | — | |
| 1999 | #732 | 307 | — | |
| 1998 | #574 | 428 | — | |
| 1997 | #744 | 287 | — | |
| 1996 | #768 | 274 | — | |
| 1995 | #722 | 283 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #802 | 252 | — | |
| 1993 | #878 | 220 | — | |
| 1992 | #898 | 218 | — | |
| 1991 | #899 | 216 | — | |
| 1990 | #975 | 191 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #905 | 203 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #1,044 | 154 | — | |
| 1987 | #986 | 159 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,012 | 152 | — | |
| 1985 | #886 | 180 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #898 | 166 | — | |
| 1983 | #811 | 191 | — | |
| 1982 | #865 | 178 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #835 | 187 | — | |
| 1980 | #708 | 240 | — | |
| 1979 | #715 | 236 | — | |
| 1978 | #739 | 211 | — | |
| 1977 | #727 | 211 | — | |
| 1976 | #662 | 231 | — | |
| 1975 | #707 | 210 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #634 | 242 | — | |
| 1973 | #648 | 231 | — | |
| 1972 | #738 | 189 | — | |
| 1971 | #757 | 193 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1970 | #690 | 227 | — | |
| 1969 | #677 | 215 | — | |
| 1968 | #678 | 205 | — | |
| 1967 | #656 | 213 | — | |
| 1966 | #644 | 222 | — | |
| 1965 | #694 | 201 | — | |
| 1964 | #701 | 218 | — | |
| 1963 | #749 | 189 | — | |
| 1962 | #743 | 193 | — | |
| 1961 | #672 | 236 | — | |
| 1960 | #776 | 173 | — | |
| 1959 | #668 | 224 | — | |
| 1958 | #746 | 179 | — | |
| 1957 | #700 | 202 | — | |
| 1956 | #698 | 188 | — | |
| 1955 | #754 | 158 | — | |
| 1954 | #709 | 169 | — | |
| 1953 | #652 | 189 | — | |
| 1952 | #691 | 166 | — | |
| 1951 | #701 | 155 | — | |
| 1950 | #785 | 122 | — | |
| 1949 | #729 | 135 | — | |
| 1948 | #764 | 125 | — | |
| 1947 | #898 | 97 | — | |
| 1946 | #874 | 90 | — | |
| 1945 | #881 | 73 | — | |
| 1944 | #925 | 69 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,143 | 50 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,065 | 54 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,087 | 46 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,097 | 43 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,069 | 45 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,355 | 29 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,135 | 38 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,442 | 26 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,213 | 35 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,287 | 32 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,460 | 28 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,339 | 32 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,394 | 31 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,095 | 18 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 | — | |
| 1924 | #3,144 | 10 | — | |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | — | |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | — | |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Graciela! It came in at #3,919, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1919, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Graciela is popular in 1999
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#384 · 1 in 1,791
- Oregon#394 · 1 in 1,812
- California#396 · 1 in 2,169
- Texas#398 · 1 in 2,197
- New Jersey#727 · 1 in 5,192
Best ever in a state: #148 in Texas, 1953.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #384 | 17 | 1 in 1,791 |
| Oregon | #394 | 9 | 1 in 1,812 |
| California | #396 | 101 | 1 in 2,169 |
| Texas | #398 | 67 | 1 in 2,197 |
| New Jersey | #727 | 8 | 1 in 5,192 |
| Florida | #745 | 14 | 1 in 5,337 |
| Illinois | #774 | 13 | 1 in 5,371 |
| North Carolina | #900 | 6 | 1 in 7,083 |
| Georgia | #921 | 7 | 1 in 6,533 |
| Michigan | #1,186 | 5 | 1 in 10,259 |
| New York | #1,299 | 9 | 1 in 11,091 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Graciela
- 109 spots since 2024 (#1,942 → #1,833)
- 27 spots since 2020 (#1,860 → #1,833)
- 19 spots since 2015 (#1,814 → #1,833)
- Biggest jump: 218 spots in 1944 (#1,143 → #925)
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 2008 (#976 → #1,157)
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1998 at #574 (428 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 61 yrs · run 1944–1985
- Highest: 1 in 4,128 girls born in 1998 were named Graciela (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 14,746 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 16.4% of all girls named Graciela (2,676) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 16 | #3,919 (1916) | #4,514 |
| 1920s | 153 | #1,339 (1929) | #2,811 |
| 1930s | 331 | #1,069 (1938) | #1,282 |
| 1940s | 782 | #729 (1949) | #946 |
| 1950s | 1,752 | #652 (1953) | #710 |
| 1960s | 2,065 | #644 (1966) | #699 |
| 1970s | 2,181 | #634 (1974) | #702 |
| 1980s | 1,810 | #708 (1980) | #895 |
| 1990s | 2,676 | #574 (1998) | #799 |
| 2000s | 2,593 | #811 (2000) | #954 |
| 2010s | 1,336 | #1,274 (2010) | #1,641 |
| 2020s | 620 | #1,833 (2025) | #1,913 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Graciela in 1999
Top girls' names in 1999
More about 1999
girls
1,773,823 girls got a published name in 1999; 1 in 5,778 of them was named Graciela, which outranked 95.7% of the 16,947 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).