Graciela
#1,833 for girls in 2025, 109 births · Last seen for boys in 1995 at #8,868
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 428 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 16,315since 1916
Graciela over time
Rank among girls' names. Graciela has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,833 | 109 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,942 | 102 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,907 | 105 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,885 | 105 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,860 | 104 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,629 | 130 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,710 | 121 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,902 | 106 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,884 | 108 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,814 | 115 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,634 | 131 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,529 | 143 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,452 | 157 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,577 | 138 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,274 | 187 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,132 | 223 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,157 | 222 | — | |
| 2007 | #976 | 275 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,074 | 237 | — | |
| 2005 | #901 | 278 | — | |
| 2004 | #855 | 287 | — | |
| 2003 | #869 | 276 | — | |
| 2002 | #931 | 241 | — | |
| 2001 | #834 | 275 | — | |
| 2000 | #811 | 279 | — | |
| 1999 | #732 | 307 | — | |
| 1998 | #574 | 428 | — | |
| 1997 | #744 | 287 | — | |
| 1996 | #768 | 274 | — | |
| 1995 | #722 | 283 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #802 | 252 | — | |
| 1993 | #878 | 220 | — | |
| 1992 | #898 | 218 | — | |
| 1991 | #899 | 216 | — | |
| 1990 | #975 | 191 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #905 | 203 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #1,044 | 154 | — | |
| 1987 | #986 | 159 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,012 | 152 | — | |
| 1985 | #886 | 180 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #898 | 166 | — | |
| 1983 | #811 | 191 | — | |
| 1982 | #865 | 178 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #835 | 187 | — | |
| 1980 | #708 | 240 | — | |
| 1979 | #715 | 236 | — | |
| 1978 | #739 | 211 | — | |
| 1977 | #727 | 211 | — | |
| 1976 | #662 | 231 | — | |
| 1975 | #707 | 210 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #634 | 242 | — | |
| 1973 | #648 | 231 | — | |
| 1972 | #738 | 189 | — | |
| 1971 | #757 | 193 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1970 | #690 | 227 | — | |
| 1969 | #677 | 215 | — | |
| 1968 | #678 | 205 | — | |
| 1967 | #656 | 213 | — | |
| 1966 | #644 | 222 | — | |
| 1965 | #694 | 201 | — | |
| 1964 | #701 | 218 | — | |
| 1963 | #749 | 189 | — | |
| 1962 | #743 | 193 | — | |
| 1961 | #672 | 236 | — | |
| 1960 | #776 | 173 | — | |
| 1959 | #668 | 224 | — | |
| 1958 | #746 | 179 | — | |
| 1957 | #700 | 202 | — | |
| 1956 | #698 | 188 | — | |
| 1955 | #754 | 158 | — | |
| 1954 | #709 | 169 | — | |
| 1953 | #652 | 189 | — | |
| 1952 | #691 | 166 | — | |
| 1951 | #701 | 155 | — | |
| 1950 | #785 | 122 | — | |
| 1949 | #729 | 135 | — | |
| 1948 | #764 | 125 | — | |
| 1947 | #898 | 97 | — | |
| 1946 | #874 | 90 | — | |
| 1945 | #881 | 73 | — | |
| 1944 | #925 | 69 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,143 | 50 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,065 | 54 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,087 | 46 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,097 | 43 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,069 | 45 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,355 | 29 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,135 | 38 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,442 | 26 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,213 | 35 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,287 | 32 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,460 | 28 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,339 | 32 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,394 | 31 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,095 | 18 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 | — | |
| 1924 | #3,144 | 10 | — | |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,612 | 13 | — | |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | — | |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Graciela! It came in at #3,919, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1919, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Graciela
- 109 spots since 2024 (#1,942 → #1,833)
- 27 spots since 2020 (#1,860 → #1,833)
- 19 spots since 2015 (#1,814 → #1,833)
- Biggest jump: 218 spots in 1944 (#1,143 → #925)
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 2008 (#976 → #1,157)
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1998 at #574 (428 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 61 yrs · run 1944–1985
- Highest: 1 in 4,128 girls born in 1998 were named Graciela (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 14,746 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 16.4% of all girls named Graciela (2,676) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 16 | #3,919 (1916) | #4,514 |
| 1920s | 153 | #1,339 (1929) | #2,811 |
| 1930s | 331 | #1,069 (1938) | #1,282 |
| 1940s | 782 | #729 (1949) | #946 |
| 1950s | 1,752 | #652 (1953) | #710 |
| 1960s | 2,065 | #644 (1966) | #699 |
| 1970s | 2,181 | #634 (1974) | #702 |
| 1980s | 1,810 | #708 (1980) | #895 |
| 1990s | 2,676 | #574 (1998) | #799 |
| 2000s | 2,593 | #811 (2000) | #954 |
| 2010s | 1,336 | #1,274 (2010) | #1,641 |
| 2020s | 620 | #1,833 (2025) | #1,913 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Graciela in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
Top boys' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 9,513 of them was named Graciela, which outranked 93.0% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #859Noel179
- #859Shakira179
- #859Sunny179
- #865Graciela178
- #865Jena178
- #865Jesica178
- #865Niki178
- #871Cory177
- #871Ivory177
- #871Mariana177
Tied with 5 names at #865; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,814,447 boys got a published name in 1982; 1 in 362,889 of them was named Graciela, which outranked 13.3% of the 7,367 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 982 names at #6,385; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.