Eunice
#2,354 for girls in 2025, 77 births · Last seen for boys in 1991 at #5,096
Given to girls 98.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1908 · 676 births
- Debut · girls
- 67 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 80,336since 1880
Eunice over time
Rank among girls' names. Eunice has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,354 | 77 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,966 | 100 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,195 | 86 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,828 | 111 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,071 | 92 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,860 | 104 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,585 | 134 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,672 | 125 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,625 | 133 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,505 | 151 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,537 | 145 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,508 | 147 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,502 | 147 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,602 | 135 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,540 | 142 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,372 | 169 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,650 | 135 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,486 | 157 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,424 | 166 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,314 | 178 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,508 | 138 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,082 | 212 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,209 | 176 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,142 | 182 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,147 | 182 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,075 | 192 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,012 | 202 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,028 | 193 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,061 | 179 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,036 | 180 | — | |
| 1995 | #893 | 212 | — | |
| 1994 | #931 | 202 | — | |
| 1993 | #934 | 202 | — | |
| 1992 | #898 | 218 | — | |
| 1991 | #965 | 195 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #924 | 206 | — | |
| 1989 | #972 | 179 | — | |
| 1988 | #841 | 214 | — | |
| 1987 | #913 | 182 | — | |
| 1986 | #915 | 176 | — | |
| 1985 | #969 | 159 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,028 | 138 | — | |
| 1983 | #983 | 148 | — | |
| 1982 | #914 | 165 | — | |
| 1981 | #998 | 146 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #871 | 176 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #995 | 143 | — | |
| 1978 | #924 | 153 | #5,059 | 6 |
| 1977 | #936 | 148 | — | |
| 1976 | #818 | 170 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #807 | 170 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #831 | 159 | — | |
| 1973 | #761 | 177 | — | |
| 1972 | #784 | 174 | — | |
| 1971 | #788 | 184 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #762 | 191 | — | |
| 1969 | #717 | 198 | — | |
| 1968 | #688 | 198 | — | |
| 1967 | #685 | 200 | — | |
| 1966 | #630 | 231 | — | |
| 1965 | #624 | 245 | — | |
| 1964 | #565 | 303 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #564 | 303 | — | |
| 1962 | #560 | 306 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #541 | 332 | — | |
| 1960 | #533 | 326 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #498 | 384 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #486 | 384 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #452 | 437 | #2,631 | 10 |
| 1956 | #453 | 406 | #2,168 | 14 |
| 1955 | #424 | 432 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #427 | 422 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #397 | 456 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #367 | 505 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #349 | 525 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #332 | 543 | #2,438 | 10 |
| 1949 | #329 | 555 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #314 | 601 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #297 | 705 | #2,251 | 12 |
| 1946 | #291 | 632 | #1,884 | 15 |
| 1945 | #275 | 628 | #1,697 | 16 |
| 1944 | #255 | 715 | #2,080 | 12 |
| 1943 | #241 | 785 | #1,636 | 19 |
| 1942 | #240 | 799 | #1,799 | 16 |
| 1941 | #226 | 772 | #1,588 | 19 |
| 1940 | #202 | 868 | #1,471 | 21 |
| 1939 | #205 | 848 | #1,879 | 14 |
| 1938 | #195 | 942 | #1,559 | 19 |
| 1937 | #186 | 1,042 | #1,627 | 18 |
| 1936 | #179 | 1,062 | #1,417 | 22 |
| 1935 | #170 | 1,129 | #1,584 | 19 |
| 1934 | #161 | 1,231 | #1,461 | 22 |
| 1933 | #154 | 1,189 | #1,281 | 27 |
| 1932 | #146 | 1,376 | #1,254 | 29 |
| 1931 | #147 | 1,344 | #1,538 | 21 |
| 1930 | #148 | 1,438 | #1,283 | 31 |
| 1929 | #145 | 1,546 | #1,443 | 25 |
| 1928 | #138 | 1,721 | #1,293 | 31 |
| 1927 | #134 | 1,948 | #1,468 | 26 |
| 1926 | #134 | 1,942 | #1,331 | 30 |
| 1925 | #130 | 2,097 | #1,144 | 38 |
| 1924 | #130 | 2,147 | #1,204 | 36 |
| 1923 | #125 | 2,114 | #1,420 | 27 |
| 1922 | #119 | 2,179 | #1,367 | 29 |
| 1921 | #120 | 2,240 | #1,329 | 31 |
| 1920 | #115 | 2,238 | #1,119 | 40 |
| 1919 | #119 | 2,061 | #1,097 | 39 |
| 1918 | #111 | 2,224 | #1,373 | 27 |
| 1917 | #111 | 2,035 | #1,322 | 27 |
| 1916 | #110 | 1,964 | #922 | 47 |
| 1915 | #109 | 1,860 | #1,217 | 29 |
| 1914 | #109 | 1,478 | #1,300 | 21 |
| 1913 | #107 | 1,214 | #1,311 | 16 |
| 1912 | #109 | 1,066 | #1,174 | 16 |
| 1911 | #109 | 830 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | #113 | 742 | #1,314 | 7 |
| 1909 | #117 | 625 | #951 | 10 |
| 1908 | #106 | 676 | #825 | 11 |
| 1907 | #111 | 608 | #999 | 8 |
| 1906 | #114 | 554 | #798 | 10 |
| 1905 | #122 | 525 | #1,091 | 6 |
| 1904 | #117 | 502 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #119 | 469 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #118 | 490 | #933 | 7 |
| 1901 | #122 | 424 | — | |
| 1900 | #125 | 503 | #699 | 13 |
| 1899 | #126 | 385 | #928 | 6 |
| 1898 | #123 | 437 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #127 | 387 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #136 | 351 | — | |
| 1895 | #137 | 334 | #978 | 6 |
| 1894 | #148 | 295 | — | |
| 1893 | #135 | 310 | #1,035 | 5 |
| 1892 | #141 | 294 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #148 | 237 | — | |
| 1890 | #166 | 214 | — | |
| 1889 | #163 | 185 | — | |
| 1888 | #162 | 180 | — | |
| 1887 | #172 | 136 | — | |
| 1886 | #163 | 142 | — | |
| 1885 | #157 | 136 | — | |
| 1884 | #166 | 112 | — | |
| 1883 | #160 | 106 | — | |
| 1882 | #183 | 75 | — | |
| 1881 | #172 | 77 | — | |
| 1880 | #182 | 67 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Eunice was already there! It came in at #182, and was given to 67 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 78 girls a year got the name.
See more about Eunice
- 388 spots since 2024 (#1,966 → #2,354)
- 494 spots since 2020 (#1,860 → #2,354)
- 817 spots since 2015 (#1,537 → #2,354)
- Biggest jump: 124 spots in 1980 (#995 → #871)
- Biggest drop: 143 spots in 1996 (#893 → #1,036)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1908 at #106 (676 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 52 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 115 yrs · run 1880–1983
- Highest: 1 in 495 girls born in 1908 were named Eunice (0.20%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,874 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 25.1% of all girls named Eunice (20,172) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,216 | #157 (1885) | #168 |
| 1890s | 3,244 | #123 (1898) | #139 |
| 1900s | 5,376 | #106 (1908) | #117 |
| 1910s | 15,474 | #107 (1913) | #111 |
| 1920s | 20,172 | #115 (1920) | #129 |
| 1930s | 11,601 | #146 (1932) | #169 |
| 1940s | 7,060 | #202 (1940) | #267 |
| 1950s | 4,494 | #332 (1950) | #419 |
| 1960s | 2,642 | #533 (1960) | #611 |
| 1970s | 1,669 | #761 (1973) | #841 |
| 1980s | 1,683 | #841 (1988) | #940 |
| 1990s | 1,989 | #893 (1995) | #968 |
| 2000s | 1,718 | #1,075 (2000) | #1,304 |
| 2010s | 1,428 | #1,372 (2010) | #1,545 |
| 2020s | 570 | #1,828 (2022) | #2,046 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eunice in 1930
Top girls' names in 1930
Top boys' names in 1930
More about 1930
girls
1,125,927 girls got a published name in 1930; 1 in 783 of them was named Eunice, which outranked 97.2% of the 5,247 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,097,378 boys got a published name in 1930; 1 in 35,399 of them was named Eunice, which outranked 71.8% of the 4,542 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,259Windell32
- #1,259Worth32
- #1,259Yoshio32
- #1,283Eunice31
- #1,283Antoine31
- #1,283Berkley31
- #1,283Buel31
- #1,299Alferd30
- #1,299Arlis30
- #1,299Armin30
Tied with 15 names at #1,283; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.