Eulalia
#2,933 for girls in 2025, 57 births
- Peak · girls
- 1893 · 55 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,854since 1880
Eulalia over time
Rank among girls' names. Eulalia has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,933 | 57 |
| 2024 | #2,694 | 64 |
| 2023 | #3,091 | 53 |
| 2022 | #2,792 | 61 |
| 2021 | #3,250 | 49 |
| 2020 | #2,890 | 56 |
| 2019 | #3,788 | 39 |
| 2018 | #4,144 | 34 |
| 2017 | #3,697 | 41 |
| 2016 | #3,707 | 41 |
| 2015 | #3,767 | 40 |
| 2014 | #5,025 | 27 |
| 2013 | #5,834 | 22 |
| 2012 | #5,114 | 27 |
| 2011 | #5,358 | 25 |
| 2010 | #3,816 | 40 |
| 2009 | #4,107 | 37 |
| 2008 | #4,882 | 30 |
| 2007 | #4,808 | 30 |
| 2006 | #4,811 | 29 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 |
| 2004 | #6,768 | 17 |
| 2003 | #5,586 | 21 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 |
| 2001 | #5,009 | 23 |
| 2000 | #5,491 | 20 |
| 1999 | #5,039 | 21 |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 |
| 1994 | #5,249 | 18 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 |
| 1992 | #3,968 | 26 |
| 1991 | #5,949 | 15 |
| 1990 | #4,694 | 20 |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 |
| 1977 | #4,235 | 16 |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 |
| 1974 | #4,720 | 12 |
| 1973 | #3,635 | 17 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 |
| 1971 | #4,534 | 12 |
| 1970 | #3,577 | 17 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 |
| 1968 | #3,057 | 18 |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 |
| 1966 | #3,040 | 17 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 |
| 1964 | #2,600 | 23 |
| 1963 | #2,864 | 19 |
| 1962 | #2,922 | 18 |
| 1961 | #2,250 | 28 |
| 1960 | #2,150 | 29 |
| 1959 | #2,152 | 28 |
| 1958 | #2,322 | 24 |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 |
| 1956 | #2,453 | 21 |
| 1955 | #2,971 | 15 |
| 1954 | #2,450 | 20 |
| 1953 | #2,017 | 26 |
| 1952 | #1,934 | 27 |
| 1951 | #1,701 | 32 |
| 1950 | #1,871 | 26 |
| 1949 | #1,603 | 34 |
| 1948 | #2,126 | 21 |
| 1947 | #1,993 | 24 |
| 1946 | #1,508 | 34 |
| 1945 | #1,588 | 27 |
| 1944 | #1,698 | 24 |
| 1943 | #1,625 | 27 |
| 1942 | #1,413 | 33 |
| 1941 | #1,243 | 37 |
| 1940 | #1,150 | 40 |
| 1939 | #1,684 | 21 |
| 1938 | #972 | 53 |
| 1937 | #1,255 | 33 |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 |
| 1935 | #1,055 | 43 |
| 1934 | #1,019 | 46 |
| 1933 | #895 | 57 |
| 1932 | #781 | 75 |
| 1931 | #784 | 74 |
| 1930 | #780 | 81 |
| 1929 | #868 | 67 |
| 1928 | #974 | 58 |
| 1927 | #792 | 84 |
| 1926 | #804 | 81 |
| 1925 | #764 | 94 |
| 1924 | #853 | 77 |
| 1923 | #796 | 83 |
| 1922 | #730 | 99 |
| 1921 | #710 | 108 |
| 1920 | #715 | 103 |
| 1919 | #700 | 100 |
| 1918 | #788 | 82 |
| 1917 | #762 | 82 |
| 1916 | #695 | 97 |
| 1915 | #738 | 81 |
| 1914 | #692 | 69 |
| 1913 | #678 | 58 |
| 1912 | #757 | 44 |
| 1911 | #667 | 42 |
| 1910 | #691 | 38 |
| 1909 | #638 | 38 |
| 1908 | #723 | 29 |
| 1907 | #649 | 33 |
| 1906 | #661 | 30 |
| 1905 | #734 | 24 |
| 1904 | #612 | 31 |
| 1903 | #607 | 29 |
| 1902 | #688 | 24 |
| 1901 | #771 | 18 |
| 1900 | #860 | 19 |
| 1899 | #606 | 26 |
| 1898 | #631 | 26 |
| 1897 | #530 | 31 |
| 1896 | #576 | 28 |
| 1895 | #499 | 34 |
| 1894 | #446 | 39 |
| 1893 | #364 | 55 |
| 1892 | #666 | 19 |
| 1891 | #589 | 20 |
| 1890 | #758 | 13 |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 |
| 1888 | #636 | 16 |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 |
| 1886 | #606 | 14 |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | #541 | 15 |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | #634 | 9 |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 |
| 1880 | #679 | 7 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Eulalia was already there! It came in at #679, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Eulalia is popular in 1931
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kansas#325 · 1 in 2,808
- Texas#367 · 1 in 2,341
- California#416 · 1 in 4,388
Best ever in a state: #133 in New Mexico, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas | #325 | 5 | 1 in 2,808 |
| Texas | #367 | 24 | 1 in 2,341 |
| California | #416 | 8 | 1 in 4,388 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eulalia
- 239 spots since 2024 (#2,694 → #2,933)
- 43 spots since 2020 (#2,890 → #2,933)
- 834 spots since 2015 (#3,767 → #2,933)
- Biggest jump: 389 spots in 1890 (#1,147 → #758)
- Biggest drop: 712 spots in 1939 (#972 → #1,684)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1893 at #364 (55 births)
- Births halved by 1898, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 52 yrs · run 1890–1933
- Highest: 1 in 3,871 girls born in 1893 were named Eulalia (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 28,198 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.6% of all girls named Eulalia (854) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 83 | #541 (1884) | #714 |
| 1890s | 291 | #364 (1893) | #567 |
| 1900s | 275 | #607 (1903) | #694 |
| 1910s | 693 | #667 (1911) | #717 |
| 1920s | 854 | #710 (1921) | #801 |
| 1930s | 523 | #780 (1930) | #1,034 |
| 1940s | 301 | #1,150 (1940) | #1,595 |
| 1950s | 240 | #1,701 (1951) | #2,236 |
| 1960s | 193 | #2,150 (1960) | #2,973 |
| 1970s | 170 | #3,259 (1975) | #3,869 |
| 1980s | 133 | #4,148 (1980) | #5,593 |
| 1990s | 179 | #3,968 (1992) | #5,465 |
| 2000s | 243 | #4,107 (2009) | #5,416 |
| 2010s | 336 | #3,697 (2017) | #4,425 |
| 2020s | 340 | #2,694 (2024) | #2,942 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eulalia in 1931
Top girls' names in 1931
More about 1931
girls
1,064,728 girls got a published name in 1931; 1 in 14,388 of them was named Eulalia, which outranked 84.3% of the 4,979 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).