Esequiel
#6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
- Peak · boys
- 1881 · 5 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,944since 1881
Esequiel over time
Rank among boys' names. Esequiel has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | boys | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,143 | 14 |
| 2024 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 2023 | #4,456 | 23 |
| 2022 | #5,019 | 19 |
| 2021 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2020 | #4,855 | 19 |
| 2019 | #6,777 | 12 |
| 2018 | #4,739 | 20 |
| 2017 | #5,526 | 16 |
| 2016 | #5,789 | 15 |
| 2015 | #5,746 | 15 |
| 2014 | #5,066 | 18 |
| 2013 | #4,064 | 24 |
| 2012 | #5,035 | 18 |
| 2011 | #4,356 | 22 |
| 2010 | #5,478 | 16 |
| 2009 | #3,551 | 30 |
| 2008 | #3,165 | 36 |
| 2007 | #3,379 | 32 |
| 2006 | #2,932 | 38 |
| 2005 | #3,091 | 33 |
| 2004 | #2,569 | 42 |
| 2003 | #3,838 | 22 |
| 2002 | #2,504 | 39 |
| 2001 | #2,742 | 34 |
| 2000 | #1,993 | 51 |
| 1999 | #1,995 | 48 |
| 1998 | #2,157 | 42 |
| 1997 | #1,890 | 49 |
| 1996 | #1,785 | 51 |
| 1995 | #1,801 | 48 |
| 1994 | #2,041 | 40 |
| 1993 | #2,209 | 35 |
| 1992 | #1,572 | 56 |
| 1991 | #2,019 | 37 |
| 1990 | #1,870 | 41 |
| 1989 | #2,615 | 24 |
| 1988 | #1,731 | 40 |
| 1987 | #1,709 | 39 |
| 1986 | #1,791 | 34 |
| 1985 | #1,594 | 40 |
| 1984 | #1,365 | 48 |
| 1983 | #1,594 | 37 |
| 1982 | #1,487 | 42 |
| 1981 | #1,270 | 52 |
| 1980 | #1,432 | 44 |
| 1979 | #1,598 | 36 |
| 1978 | #1,760 | 30 |
| 1977 | #1,645 | 33 |
| 1976 | #1,286 | 47 |
| 1975 | #1,322 | 43 |
| 1974 | #1,073 | 59 |
| 1973 | #1,514 | 32 |
| 1972 | #1,307 | 41 |
| 1971 | #1,668 | 28 |
| 1970 | #1,582 | 29 |
| 1969 | #1,914 | 19 |
| 1968 | #1,544 | 26 |
| 1967 | #1,609 | 23 |
| 1966 | #1,684 | 21 |
| 1965 | #1,429 | 29 |
| 1964 | #1,700 | 22 |
| 1963 | #1,957 | 17 |
| 1962 | #1,852 | 19 |
| 1961 | #1,997 | 17 |
| 1960 | #1,858 | 19 |
| 1959 | #1,916 | 18 |
| 1958 | #2,177 | 14 |
| 1957 | #1,583 | 25 |
| 1956 | #1,642 | 23 |
| 1955 | #1,572 | 24 |
| 1954 | #1,628 | 22 |
| 1953 | #1,455 | 27 |
| 1952 | #1,856 | 17 |
| 1951 | #1,489 | 25 |
| 1950 | #1,434 | 26 |
| 1949 | #1,583 | 22 |
| 1948 | #1,656 | 20 |
| 1947 | #1,646 | 21 |
| 1946 | #1,176 | 35 |
| 1945 | #1,581 | 18 |
| 1944 | #1,255 | 28 |
| 1943 | #1,529 | 21 |
| 1942 | #1,730 | 17 |
| 1941 | #1,821 | 15 |
| 1940 | #1,736 | 16 |
| 1939 | #1,795 | 15 |
| 1938 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #2,088 | 12 |
| 1936 | #1,964 | 13 |
| 1935 | #2,246 | 11 |
| 1934 | #1,551 | 20 |
| 1933 | #1,707 | 17 |
| 1932 | #1,777 | 17 |
| 1931 | #1,538 | 21 |
| 1930 | #2,079 | 14 |
| 1929 | #2,002 | 15 |
| 1928 | #1,480 | 25 |
| 1927 | #2,034 | 16 |
| 1926 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #2,012 | 16 |
| 1924 | #1,839 | 19 |
| 1923 | #2,331 | 13 |
| 1922 | #2,347 | 13 |
| 1921 | #1,980 | 17 |
| 1920 | #1,592 | 23 |
| 1919 | #1,695 | 20 |
| 1918 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #1,900 | 16 |
| 1916 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #2,310 | 11 |
| 1914 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #2,273 | 7 |
| 1912 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,233 | 5 |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | #866 | 5 |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five boys were named Esequiel! It came in at #866, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1912, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Esequiel is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#1,044 · 1 in 16,525
- Texas#1,251 · 1 in 19,047
Best ever in a state: #77 in New Mexico, 1918.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,044 | 15 | 1 in 16,525 |
| Texas | #1,251 | 9 | 1 in 19,047 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Esequiel
- 484 spots since 2024 (#5,659 → #6,143)
- 1,288 spots since 2020 (#4,855 → #6,143)
- 397 spots since 2015 (#5,746 → #6,143)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1881 at #866 (5 births)
- Births halved by 1882, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1881
- Highest: 1 in 20,147 boys born in 1881 were named Esequiel (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 122,005 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 15.2% of all boys named Esequiel (447) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #866 (1881) | #866 |
| 1890s | 0 | — | — |
| 1900s | 5 | #1,233 (1905) | #1,233 |
| 1910s | 103 | #1,446 (1918) | #2,125 |
| 1920s | 172 | #1,480 (1928) | #1,969 |
| 1930s | 152 | #1,538 (1931) | #1,883 |
| 1940s | 213 | #1,176 (1946) | #1,571 |
| 1950s | 221 | #1,434 (1950) | #1,675 |
| 1960s | 212 | #1,429 (1965) | #1,754 |
| 1970s | 378 | #1,073 (1974) | #1,476 |
| 1980s | 400 | #1,270 (1981) | #1,659 |
| 1990s | 447 | #1,572 (1992) | #1,934 |
| 2000s | 357 | #1,993 (2000) | #2,976 |
| 2010s | 176 | #4,064 (2013) | #5,258 |
| 2020s | 103 | #4,456 (2023) | #5,472 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Esequiel in 2000
Top boys' names in 2000
More about 2000
boys
1,964,001 boys got a published name in 2000; 1 in 38,510 of them was named Esequiel, which outranked 83.6% of the 12,119 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,968Percy52
- #1,968Steele52
- #1,968Tyjuan52
- #1,993Esequiel51
- #1,993Baltazar51
- #1,993Carmelo51
- #1,993Chet51
- #2,015Akil50
- #2,015Alexi50
- #2,015Archie50
Tied with 21 names at #1,993; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.