Erlinda
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #9,616
- Peak · girls
- 1949 · 171 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,656since 1900
Erlinda over time
Rank among girls' names. Erlinda has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | #9,616 | 10 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 |
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | #13,069 | 7 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 |
| 2010 | #10,451 | 10 |
| 2009 | #11,459 | 9 |
| 2008 | #9,476 | 12 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 |
| 2003 | #5,419 | 22 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 |
| 1992 | #5,718 | 16 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 |
| 1987 | #4,283 | 19 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 |
| 1985 | #3,621 | 23 |
| 1984 | #2,677 | 34 |
| 1983 | #3,065 | 27 |
| 1982 | #2,830 | 32 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 |
| 1980 | #2,749 | 33 |
| 1979 | #2,860 | 30 |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 |
| 1977 | #3,002 | 26 |
| 1976 | #2,060 | 42 |
| 1975 | #2,278 | 36 |
| 1974 | #2,290 | 34 |
| 1973 | #2,171 | 36 |
| 1972 | #2,276 | 33 |
| 1971 | #2,599 | 28 |
| 1970 | #2,043 | 40 |
| 1969 | #1,927 | 42 |
| 1968 | #1,999 | 36 |
| 1967 | #1,559 | 52 |
| 1966 | #1,669 | 45 |
| 1965 | #1,547 | 52 |
| 1964 | #1,518 | 56 |
| 1963 | #1,290 | 73 |
| 1962 | #1,456 | 58 |
| 1961 | #1,279 | 75 |
| 1960 | #1,192 | 83 |
| 1959 | #1,262 | 72 |
| 1958 | #1,129 | 88 |
| 1957 | #1,072 | 94 |
| 1956 | #1,023 | 100 |
| 1955 | #1,220 | 68 |
| 1954 | #969 | 100 |
| 1953 | #874 | 115 |
| 1952 | #935 | 98 |
| 1951 | #803 | 123 |
| 1950 | #745 | 133 |
| 1949 | #632 | 171 |
| 1948 | #707 | 140 |
| 1947 | #755 | 129 |
| 1946 | #853 | 94 |
| 1945 | #790 | 90 |
| 1944 | #909 | 71 |
| 1943 | #895 | 76 |
| 1942 | #968 | 65 |
| 1941 | #871 | 70 |
| 1940 | #915 | 61 |
| 1939 | #987 | 51 |
| 1938 | #811 | 75 |
| 1937 | #877 | 62 |
| 1936 | #941 | 53 |
| 1935 | #840 | 67 |
| 1934 | #981 | 49 |
| 1933 | #1,158 | 37 |
| 1932 | #1,004 | 49 |
| 1931 | #941 | 54 |
| 1930 | #894 | 65 |
| 1929 | #902 | 63 |
| 1928 | #974 | 58 |
| 1927 | #1,035 | 55 |
| 1926 | #997 | 56 |
| 1925 | #1,252 | 39 |
| 1924 | #999 | 58 |
| 1923 | #1,197 | 42 |
| 1922 | #1,403 | 33 |
| 1921 | #1,148 | 44 |
| 1920 | #1,312 | 35 |
| 1919 | #1,565 | 26 |
| 1918 | #1,754 | 22 |
| 1917 | #1,923 | 18 |
| 1916 | #2,246 | 14 |
| 1915 | #2,050 | 15 |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 |
| 1909 | #1,471 | 9 |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Erlinda! It came in at #1,932, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1900–1901, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Erlinda is popular in 1935
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#52 · 1 in 191
- California#360 · 1 in 3,174
- Texas#445 · 1 in 3,338
Best ever in a state: #40 in New Mexico, 1929.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #52 | 27 | 1 in 191 |
| California | #360 | 11 | 1 in 3,174 |
| Texas | #445 | 17 | 1 in 3,338 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Erlinda
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 1926 (#1,252 → #997)
- Biggest drop: 253 spots in 1925 (#999 → #1,252)
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 1949 at #632 (171 births)
- Births halved by 1955, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1934–1954
- Highest: 1 in 10,005 girls born in 1949 were named Erlinda (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 160,458 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- 21.3% of all girls named Erlinda (991) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 32 | #1,471 (1909) | #1,690 |
| 1910s | 131 | #1,565 (1919) | #2,121 |
| 1920s | 483 | #902 (1929) | #1,122 |
| 1930s | 562 | #811 (1938) | #943 |
| 1940s | 967 | #632 (1949) | #830 |
| 1950s | 991 | #745 (1950) | #1,003 |
| 1960s | 572 | #1,192 (1960) | #1,544 |
| 1970s | 329 | #2,043 (1970) | #2,478 |
| 1980s | 259 | #2,677 (1984) | #3,466 |
| 1990s | 140 | #4,003 (1990) | #6,843 |
| 2000s | 116 | #5,419 (2003) | #9,924 |
| 2010s | 45 | #10,451 (2010) | #14,220 |
| 2020s | 29 | #9,616 (2023) | #12,361 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Erlinda in 1935
Top girls' names in 1935
More about 1935
girls
1,048,577 girls got a published name in 1935; 1 in 15,650 of them was named Erlinda, which outranked 82.8% of the 4,893 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #834Leatha68
- #834Lonnie68
- #834Melvina68
- #840Erlinda67
- #840Ardell67
- #840Easter67
- #840Hettie67
- #849Cecil66
- #849Dee66
- #849Earlean66
Tied with 8 names at #840; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 2,736Norita#3,449 → #713
- ↑ 1,073Shelby#1,913 → #840
- ↑ 672Darla#1,344 → #672
- ↑ 396Shirleyann#1,292 → #896
- ↑ 375Loris#1,236 → #861
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.