Emmalee
#3,296 for girls in 2025, 47 births
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 441 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,008since 1909
Emmalee over time
Rank among girls' names. Emmalee has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,296 | 47 |
| 2024 | #2,775 | 61 |
| 2023 | #1,850 | 108 |
| 2022 | #1,942 | 102 |
| 2021 | #1,841 | 109 |
| 2020 | #1,654 | 124 |
| 2019 | #1,429 | 156 |
| 2018 | #1,299 | 175 |
| 2017 | #1,098 | 230 |
| 2016 | #1,010 | 262 |
| 2015 | #972 | 278 |
| 2014 | #855 | 322 |
| 2013 | #768 | 355 |
| 2012 | #801 | 335 |
| 2011 | #722 | 383 |
| 2010 | #786 | 350 |
| 2009 | #734 | 394 |
| 2008 | #742 | 399 |
| 2007 | #777 | 372 |
| 2006 | #690 | 410 |
| 2005 | #634 | 441 |
| 2004 | #648 | 423 |
| 2003 | #673 | 393 |
| 2002 | #830 | 281 |
| 2001 | #902 | 251 |
| 2000 | #927 | 232 |
| 1999 | #877 | 245 |
| 1998 | #1,065 | 183 |
| 1997 | #1,040 | 183 |
| 1996 | #1,246 | 140 |
| 1995 | #1,197 | 143 |
| 1994 | #1,394 | 116 |
| 1993 | #1,529 | 102 |
| 1992 | #1,704 | 88 |
| 1991 | #1,958 | 71 |
| 1990 | #1,974 | 69 |
| 1989 | #2,119 | 58 |
| 1988 | #2,187 | 52 |
| 1987 | #2,276 | 47 |
| 1986 | #2,903 | 32 |
| 1985 | #2,362 | 42 |
| 1984 | #2,781 | 32 |
| 1983 | #2,910 | 29 |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 |
| 1981 | #3,739 | 21 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 |
| 1978 | #4,459 | 15 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 |
| 1924 | #3,144 | 10 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 |
| 1921 | #3,164 | 10 |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 |
| 1912 | #1,981 | 9 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Emmalee! It came in at #1,763, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1910–1911, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Emmalee is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#403 · 1 in 1,850
- Utah#415 · 1 in 1,766
- Nebraska#421 · 1 in 1,574
- Tennessee#442 · 1 in 1,982
- Oklahoma#452 · 1 in 1,850
Best ever in a state: #152 in West Virginia, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #403 | 10 | 1 in 1,850 |
| Utah | #415 | 10 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Nebraska | #421 | 5 | 1 in 1,574 |
| Tennessee | #442 | 15 | 1 in 1,982 |
| Oklahoma | #452 | 9 | 1 in 1,850 |
| Oregon | #452 | 8 | 1 in 1,877 |
| Kansas | #465 | 7 | 1 in 1,839 |
| Missouri | #465 | 13 | 1 in 2,078 |
| Indiana | #516 | 12 | 1 in 2,486 |
| Colorado | #556 | 9 | 1 in 2,525 |
| Georgia | #583 | 16 | 1 in 2,909 |
| Washington | #617 | 10 | 1 in 2,982 |
| South Carolina | #625 | 6 | 1 in 2,920 |
| Ohio | #627 | 15 | 1 in 3,506 |
| Louisiana | #629 | 7 | 1 in 2,879 |
| Wisconsin | #643 | 7 | 1 in 3,296 |
| Pennsylvania | #657 | 14 | 1 in 3,720 |
| Arizona | #699 | 9 | 1 in 3,414 |
| Minnesota | #749 | 6 | 1 in 4,027 |
| Michigan | #752 | 10 | 1 in 4,164 |
| Illinois | #846 | 12 | 1 in 4,830 |
| North Carolina | #848 | 9 | 1 in 4,922 |
| Maryland | #861 | 5 | 1 in 4,704 |
| Texas | #902 | 30 | 1 in 5,366 |
| Virginia | #1,145 | 5 | 1 in 7,257 |
| Florida | #1,147 | 11 | 1 in 7,378 |
| New Jersey | #1,150 | 5 | 1 in 7,299 |
| California | #1,312 | 22 | 1 in 9,326 |
| New York | #1,555 | 8 | 1 in 11,408 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emmalee
- 521 spots since 2024 (#2,775 → #3,296)
- 1,642 spots since 2020 (#1,654 → #3,296)
- 2,324 spots since 2015 (#972 → #3,296)
- Biggest jump: 188 spots in 1999 (#1,065 → #877)
- Biggest drop: 117 spots in 2015 (#855 → #972)
- Debuted 1909
- Peaked 2005 at #634 (441 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 1999–2015
- Highest: 1 in 4,190 girls born in 2005 were named Emmalee (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 34,197 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 39.9% of all girls named Emmalee (3,596) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | #1,763 (1909) | #1,763 |
| 1910s | 57 | #1,981 (1912) | #2,974 |
| 1920s | 87 | #2,474 (1926) | #3,331 |
| 1930s | 43 | #2,926 (1935) | #3,488 |
| 1940s | 35 | #3,034 (1946) | #3,855 |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 11 | #5,851 (1961) | #6,328 |
| 1970s | 83 | #3,147 (1979) | #5,842 |
| 1980s | 352 | #2,119 (1989) | #2,999 |
| 1990s | 1,340 | #877 (1999) | #1,398 |
| 2000s | 3,596 | #634 (2005) | #756 |
| 2010s | 2,846 | #722 (2011) | #974 |
| 2020s | 551 | #1,654 (2020) | #2,226 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emmalee in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 4,943 of them was named Emmalee, which outranked 96.0% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.