Emilio
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #16,099 · #154 for boys in 2025, 2,397 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 2,369 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 53,955since 1882
Emilio over time
Rank among boys' names. Emilio has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #154 | 2,397 | |
| 2024 | — | #151 | 2,369 | |
| 2023 | — | #181 | 2,015 | |
| 2022 | — | #198 | 1,909 | |
| 2021 | — | #219 | 1,744 | |
| 2020 | — | #229 | 1,629 | |
| 2019 | — | #240 | 1,579 | |
| 2018 | — | #248 | 1,494 | |
| 2017 | — | #261 | 1,398 | |
| 2016 | — | #273 | 1,345 | |
| 2015 | — | #304 | 1,191 | |
| 2014 | — | #281 | 1,281 | |
| 2013 | — | #297 | 1,180 | |
| 2012 | — | #297 | 1,171 | |
| 2011 | — | #302 | 1,090 | |
| 2010 | — | #308 | 1,035 | |
| 2009 | — | #312 | 1,027 | |
| 2008 | — | #282 | 1,209 | |
| 2007 | — | #275 | 1,248 | |
| 2006 | — | #297 | 1,123 | |
| 2005 | — | #274 | 1,217 | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #297 | 1,070 |
| 2003 | — | #312 | 957 | |
| 2002 | — | #337 | 815 | |
| 2001 | — | #353 | 756 | |
| 2000 | — | #347 | 790 | |
| 1999 | — | #345 | 770 | |
| 1998 | — | #340 | 789 | |
| 1997 | — | #322 | 815 | |
| 1996 | — | #337 | 767 | |
| 1995 | — | #370 | 644 | |
| 1994 | — | #380 | 618 | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #354 | 667 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #384 | 595 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #409 | 557 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #436 | 509 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #441 | 456 |
| 1988 | — | #492 | 347 | |
| 1987 | — | #532 | 288 | |
| 1986 | — | #568 | 242 | |
| 1985 | — | #588 | 223 | |
| 1984 | — | #578 | 216 | |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #569 | 220 |
| 1982 | — | #537 | 254 | |
| 1981 | — | #556 | 235 | |
| 1980 | — | #613 | 204 | |
| 1979 | — | #601 | 203 | |
| 1978 | — | #586 | 206 | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #564 | 219 |
| 1976 | — | #603 | 182 | |
| 1975 | — | #578 | 194 | |
| 1974 | — | #568 | 199 | |
| 1973 | — | #564 | 199 | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #573 | 193 |
| 1971 | — | #614 | 186 | |
| 1970 | — | #612 | 176 | |
| 1969 | — | #576 | 185 | |
| 1968 | — | #600 | 160 | |
| 1967 | — | #571 | 173 | |
| 1966 | — | #642 | 133 | |
| 1965 | — | #610 | 157 | |
| 1964 | — | #627 | 153 | |
| 1963 | — | #616 | 159 | |
| 1962 | — | #632 | 148 | |
| 1961 | — | #645 | 148 | |
| 1960 | — | #644 | 147 | |
| 1959 | — | #644 | 142 | |
| 1958 | — | #629 | 149 | |
| 1957 | — | #628 | 149 | |
| 1956 | — | #659 | 132 | |
| 1955 | — | #594 | 153 | |
| 1954 | — | #643 | 130 | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #607 | 143 |
| 1952 | — | #608 | 134 | |
| 1951 | — | #619 | 130 | |
| 1950 | — | #612 | 125 | |
| 1949 | — | #580 | 134 | |
| 1948 | — | #598 | 127 | |
| 1947 | — | #568 | 141 | |
| 1946 | — | #648 | 99 | |
| 1945 | — | #599 | 102 | |
| 1944 | — | #554 | 119 | |
| 1943 | — | #633 | 101 | |
| 1942 | — | #680 | 90 | |
| 1941 | — | #640 | 91 | |
| 1940 | — | #622 | 91 | |
| 1939 | — | #621 | 88 | |
| 1938 | — | #579 | 102 | |
| 1937 | — | #609 | 91 | |
| 1936 | — | #581 | 98 | |
| 1935 | — | #543 | 113 | |
| 1934 | — | #522 | 126 | |
| 1933 | — | #515 | 120 | |
| 1932 | — | #493 | 135 | |
| 1931 | — | #484 | 139 | |
| 1930 | — | #445 | 175 | |
| 1929 | — | #486 | 146 | |
| 1928 | — | #451 | 178 | |
| 1927 | — | #512 | 141 | |
| 1926 | — | #533 | 130 | |
| 1925 | — | #472 | 164 | |
| 1924 | — | #479 | 166 | |
| 1923 | — | #515 | 139 | |
| 1922 | — | #597 | 117 | |
| 1921 | — | #592 | 115 | |
| 1920 | — | #551 | 123 | |
| 1919 | — | #638 | 91 | |
| 1918 | — | #582 | 109 | |
| 1917 | — | #591 | 101 | |
| 1916 | — | #581 | 99 | |
| 1915 | — | #629 | 85 | |
| 1914 | — | #543 | 82 | |
| 1913 | — | #560 | 60 | |
| 1912 | — | #568 | 50 | |
| 1911 | — | #732 | 19 | |
| 1910 | — | #634 | 21 | |
| 1909 | — | #545 | 23 | |
| 1908 | — | #657 | 16 | |
| 1907 | — | #616 | 17 | |
| 1906 | — | #852 | 9 | |
| 1905 | — | #919 | 8 | |
| 1904 | — | #612 | 14 | |
| 1903 | — | #846 | 8 | |
| 1902 | — | #933 | 7 | |
| 1901 | — | #683 | 10 | |
| 1900 | — | #649 | 15 | |
| 1899 | — | #786 | 8 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #1,101 | 5 | |
| 1895 | — | #872 | 7 | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | #1,035 | 5 | |
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #764 | 7 | |
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | #837 | 6 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Emilio! It came in at #837, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1885–1894, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Emilio is popular in 1915
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#83 · 1 in 340
- Florida#168 · 1 in 934
- Massachusetts#235 · 1 in 3,079
- California#254 · 1 in 2,149
- New York#316 · 1 in 4,896
Best ever in a state: #38 in New Mexico, 1913.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #83 | 8 | 1 in 340 |
| Florida | #168 | 8 | 1 in 934 |
| Massachusetts | #235 | 9 | 1 in 3,079 |
| California | #254 | 8 | 1 in 2,149 |
| New York | #316 | 16 | 1 in 4,896 |
| Texas | #454 | 10 | 1 in 3,702 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Emilio
- 3 spots since 2024 (#151 → #154)
- 75 spots since 2020 (#229 → #154)
- 150 spots since 2015 (#304 → #154)
- Biggest jump: 236 spots in 1907 (#852 → #616)
- Biggest drop: 307 spots in 1905 (#612 → #919)
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 2024 at #151 (2,369 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 132 yrs · run 1899–2025
- Highest: 1 in 713 boys born in 2025 were named Emilio (0.14%)
- Its best rank, #151 in 2024, was only 1 in 727 (0.14%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.7% of all boys named Emilio (12,764) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 23 | #764 (1884) | #863 |
| 1890s | 25 | #786 (1899) | #949 |
| 1900s | 127 | #545 (1909) | #731 |
| 1910s | 717 | #543 (1914) | #606 |
| 1920s | 1,419 | #451 (1928) | #519 |
| 1930s | 1,187 | #445 (1930) | #539 |
| 1940s | 1,095 | #554 (1944) | #612 |
| 1950s | 1,387 | #594 (1955) | #624 |
| 1960s | 1,563 | #571 (1967) | #616 |
| 1970s | 1,957 | #564 (1977) | #586 |
| 1980s | 2,685 | #441 (1989) | #547 |
| 1990s | 6,731 | #322 (1997) | #368 |
| 2000s | 10,212 | #274 (2005) | #309 |
| 2010s | 12,764 | #240 (2019) | #281 |
| 2020s | 12,063 | #151 (2024) | #189 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Emilio in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 9,983 of them was named Emilio, which outranked 85.7% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).