Eloisa
#1,525 for girls in 2025, 139 births
- Peak · girls
- 1919 · 100 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,040since 1886
Eloisa over time
Rank among girls' names. Eloisa has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,525 | 139 |
| 2024 | #1,622 | 128 |
| 2023 | #1,850 | 108 |
| 2022 | #2,006 | 97 |
| 2021 | #1,926 | 102 |
| 2020 | #2,317 | 76 |
| 2019 | #2,651 | 65 |
| 2018 | #2,869 | 58 |
| 2017 | #2,597 | 67 |
| 2016 | #2,560 | 69 |
| 2015 | #2,964 | 58 |
| 2014 | #3,486 | 45 |
| 2013 | #3,367 | 47 |
| 2012 | #4,836 | 29 |
| 2011 | #3,659 | 42 |
| 2010 | #3,624 | 43 |
| 2009 | #4,571 | 32 |
| 2008 | #3,710 | 43 |
| 2007 | #4,475 | 33 |
| 2006 | #3,264 | 50 |
| 2005 | #2,935 | 55 |
| 2004 | #4,093 | 34 |
| 2003 | #3,532 | 40 |
| 2002 | #3,146 | 45 |
| 2001 | #3,142 | 44 |
| 2000 | #3,121 | 44 |
| 1999 | #2,935 | 45 |
| 1998 | #2,570 | 53 |
| 1997 | #2,450 | 53 |
| 1996 | #2,372 | 55 |
| 1995 | #2,345 | 56 |
| 1994 | #2,503 | 50 |
| 1993 | #2,127 | 63 |
| 1992 | #1,798 | 80 |
| 1991 | #2,073 | 65 |
| 1990 | #1,847 | 77 |
| 1989 | #1,925 | 67 |
| 1988 | #2,152 | 53 |
| 1987 | #2,398 | 43 |
| 1986 | #2,079 | 51 |
| 1985 | #2,222 | 46 |
| 1984 | #1,866 | 57 |
| 1983 | #1,907 | 54 |
| 1982 | #2,150 | 47 |
| 1981 | #1,867 | 58 |
| 1980 | #1,805 | 60 |
| 1979 | #1,753 | 62 |
| 1978 | #1,707 | 61 |
| 1977 | #1,857 | 54 |
| 1976 | #1,747 | 54 |
| 1975 | #1,689 | 56 |
| 1974 | #2,066 | 40 |
| 1973 | #1,666 | 54 |
| 1972 | #1,488 | 64 |
| 1971 | #1,640 | 56 |
| 1970 | #1,804 | 49 |
| 1969 | #1,784 | 47 |
| 1968 | #1,909 | 39 |
| 1967 | #1,682 | 46 |
| 1966 | #1,916 | 36 |
| 1965 | #1,595 | 49 |
| 1964 | #1,666 | 48 |
| 1963 | #1,715 | 45 |
| 1962 | #1,826 | 39 |
| 1961 | #1,520 | 55 |
| 1960 | #1,542 | 52 |
| 1959 | #1,881 | 35 |
| 1958 | #1,791 | 37 |
| 1957 | #1,531 | 49 |
| 1956 | #1,329 | 61 |
| 1955 | #1,404 | 51 |
| 1954 | #1,444 | 48 |
| 1953 | #1,586 | 38 |
| 1952 | #1,333 | 52 |
| 1951 | #1,277 | 53 |
| 1950 | #1,576 | 35 |
| 1949 | #1,304 | 49 |
| 1948 | #1,124 | 63 |
| 1947 | #1,161 | 60 |
| 1946 | #1,148 | 55 |
| 1945 | #954 | 65 |
| 1944 | #1,129 | 48 |
| 1943 | #856 | 83 |
| 1942 | #1,137 | 48 |
| 1941 | #924 | 63 |
| 1940 | #1,272 | 34 |
| 1939 | #930 | 57 |
| 1938 | #931 | 58 |
| 1937 | #910 | 57 |
| 1936 | #748 | 80 |
| 1935 | #904 | 58 |
| 1934 | #811 | 69 |
| 1933 | #865 | 60 |
| 1932 | #913 | 59 |
| 1931 | #931 | 55 |
| 1930 | #795 | 79 |
| 1929 | #764 | 83 |
| 1928 | #791 | 82 |
| 1927 | #776 | 87 |
| 1926 | #725 | 100 |
| 1925 | #874 | 72 |
| 1924 | #734 | 101 |
| 1923 | #828 | 78 |
| 1922 | #725 | 100 |
| 1921 | #779 | 88 |
| 1920 | #762 | 91 |
| 1919 | #700 | 100 |
| 1918 | #843 | 73 |
| 1917 | #784 | 78 |
| 1916 | #1,059 | 43 |
| 1915 | #927 | 51 |
| 1914 | #919 | 41 |
| 1913 | #913 | 34 |
| 1912 | #868 | 33 |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 |
| 1910 | #896 | 23 |
| 1909 | #909 | 20 |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 |
| 1906 | #818 | 20 |
| 1905 | #900 | 17 |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 |
| 1901 | #961 | 12 |
| 1900 | #860 | 19 |
| 1899 | #878 | 14 |
| 1898 | #1,098 | 10 |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 |
| 1895 | #986 | 11 |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | #937 | 7 |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Eloisa! It came in at #993, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1888–1890, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Eloisa is popular in 1941
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#157 · 1 in 586
- Texas#257 · 1 in 1,449
- California#644 · 1 in 9,291
Best ever in a state: #26 in New Mexico, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #157 | 10 | 1 in 586 |
| Texas | #257 | 44 | 1 in 1,449 |
| California | #644 | 6 | 1 in 9,291 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Eloisa
- 97 spots since 2024 (#1,622 → #1,525)
- 792 spots since 2020 (#2,317 → #1,525)
- 1,439 spots since 2015 (#2,964 → #1,525)
- Biggest jump: 591 spots in 1904 (#1,318 → #727)
- Biggest drop: 345 spots in 1911 (#896 → #1,241)
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 1919 at #700 (100 births)
- Births halved by 1940, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 45 yrs · run 1917–1939
- Highest: 1 in 11,301 girls born in 1919 were named Eloisa (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,563 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 12.5% of all girls named Eloisa (882) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 18 | #937 (1887) | #1,070 |
| 1890s | 90 | #839 (1891) | #1,025 |
| 1900s | 169 | #727 (1904) | #938 |
| 1910s | 490 | #700 (1919) | #915 |
| 1920s | 882 | #725 (1922) | #776 |
| 1930s | 632 | #748 (1936) | #874 |
| 1940s | 568 | #856 (1943) | #1,101 |
| 1950s | 459 | #1,277 (1951) | #1,515 |
| 1960s | 456 | #1,520 (1961) | #1,716 |
| 1970s | 550 | #1,488 (1972) | #1,742 |
| 1980s | 536 | #1,805 (1980) | #2,037 |
| 1990s | 597 | #1,798 (1992) | #2,302 |
| 2000s | 420 | #2,935 (2005) | #3,599 |
| 2010s | 523 | #2,560 (2016) | #3,261 |
| 2020s | 650 | #1,525 (2025) | #1,874 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Eloisa in 1941
Top girls' names in 1941
More about 1941
girls
1,208,119 girls got a published name in 1941; 1 in 19,176 of them was named Eloisa, which outranked 81.8% of the 5,085 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).