Elois
Last seen for girls in 1976 at #8,156 · Last seen for boys in 1927 at #4,210
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1935 · 75 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,642since 1895
Elois over time
Rank among girls' names. Elois has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,300 | 10 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,864 | 19 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,033 | 17 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,411 | 25 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,395 | 23 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,939 | 32 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,067 | 28 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,871 | 33 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,556 | 43 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,465 | 47 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,358 | 51 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,454 | 44 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,339 | 48 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,433 | 41 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,189 | 58 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,105 | 65 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,228 | 54 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,116 | 58 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,100 | 51 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,153 | 46 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,251 | 42 | — | |
| 1942 | #968 | 65 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,006 | 53 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,088 | 44 | — | |
| 1939 | #996 | 50 | — | |
| 1938 | #899 | 62 | — | |
| 1937 | #904 | 58 | — | |
| 1936 | #870 | 61 | — | |
| 1935 | #779 | 75 | — | |
| 1934 | #917 | 56 | — | |
| 1933 | #814 | 67 | — | |
| 1932 | #830 | 68 | — | |
| 1931 | #812 | 70 | — | |
| 1930 | #856 | 70 | — | |
| 1929 | #876 | 66 | — | |
| 1928 | #936 | 63 | — | |
| 1927 | #856 | 74 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #971 | 59 | — | |
| 1925 | #923 | 65 | — | |
| 1924 | #893 | 71 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,015 | 55 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,089 | 49 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #919 | 65 | — | |
| 1920 | #989 | 55 | — | |
| 1919 | #954 | 55 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,061 | 47 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,126 | 40 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,127 | 39 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,285 | 30 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,603 | 17 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,528 | 15 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,178 | 20 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,792 | 8 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,634 | 9 | — | |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | — | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Elois! It came in at #1,592, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1895–1906, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Elois is popular in 1933
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#316 · 1 in 2,256
- North Carolina#457 · 1 in 5,737
- Kentucky#461 · 1 in 5,196
Best ever in a state: #281 in Florida, 1927.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #316 | 9 | 1 in 2,256 |
| North Carolina | #457 | 6 | 1 in 5,737 |
| Kentucky | #461 | 5 | 1 in 5,196 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Elois
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1976
- Biggest jump: 138 spots in 1935 (#917 → #779)
- Biggest drop: 283 spots in 1943 (#968 → #1,251)
- Debuted 1895
- Peaked 1935 at #779 (75 births)
- Births halved by 1956, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 1924–1939
- Highest: 1 in 13,981 girls born in 1935 were named Elois (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 244,183 girls born in 1976 (0.00%)
- 24.1% of all girls named Elois (637) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,592 (1895) | #1,592 |
| 1900s | 26 | #1,821 (1907) | #1,958 |
| 1910s | 280 | #954 (1919) | #1,329 |
| 1920s | 622 | #856 (1927) | #947 |
| 1930s | 637 | #779 (1935) | #868 |
| 1940s | 536 | #968 (1942) | #1,120 |
| 1950s | 390 | #1,339 (1951) | #1,688 |
| 1960s | 135 | #2,246 (1960) | #3,797 |
| 1970s | 11 | #8,156 (1976) | #8,466 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Elois in 1933
Top girls' names in 1933
More about 1933
girls
1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 15,044 of them was named Elois, which outranked 83.2% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).