Ellis
#682 for girls in 2025, 415 births · #243 for boys in 2025, 1,417 births
Given to boys 87.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1899 · 98 births
- Debut · boys
- 58 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 50,403since 1880
Ellis over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #682 | 415 | #243 | 1,417 |
| 2024 | #696 | 404 | #273 | 1,250 |
| 2023 | #752 | 375 | #275 | 1,230 |
| 2022 | #699 | 422 | #307 | 1,094 |
| 2021 | #597 | 501 | #320 | 1,038 |
| 2020 | #618 | 472 | #326 | 1,010 |
| 2019 | #717 | 398 | #342 | 976 |
| 2018 | #775 | 352 | #318 | 1,063 |
| 2017 | #743 | 380 | #311 | 1,109 |
| 2016 | #844 | 337 | #347 | 999 |
| 2015 | #962 | 282 | #422 | 740 |
| 2014 | #1,074 | 238 | #443 | 680 |
| 2013 | #1,086 | 227 | #531 | 501 |
| 2012 | #1,136 | 216 | #611 | 403 |
| 2011 | #1,276 | 186 | #726 | 313 |
| 2010 | #1,489 | 151 | #729 | 314 |
| 2009 | #1,756 | 124 | #720 | 328 |
| 2008 | #1,913 | 110 | #795 | 276 |
| 2007 | #1,877 | 111 | #815 | 262 |
| 2006 | #1,988 | 100 | #776 | 267 |
| 2005 | #2,160 | 85 | #790 | 246 |
| 2004 | #3,224 | 47 | #838 | 212 |
| 2003 | #2,840 | 54 | #828 | 211 |
| 2002 | #3,394 | 40 | #910 | 177 |
| 2001 | #2,881 | 50 | #926 | 167 |
| 2000 | #3,738 | 34 | #785 | 209 |
| 1999 | #3,718 | 32 | #837 | 180 |
| 1998 | #2,846 | 46 | #817 | 184 |
| 1997 | #3,105 | 38 | #758 | 196 |
| 1996 | #3,632 | 30 | #780 | 187 |
| 1995 | #3,022 | 38 | #833 | 166 |
| 1994 | #4,687 | 21 | #847 | 160 |
| 1993 | #3,290 | 34 | #817 | 167 |
| 1992 | #4,382 | 23 | #765 | 186 |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | #740 | 189 |
| 1990 | #6,465 | 13 | #757 | 181 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #751 | 172 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #780 | 146 |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | #717 | 162 |
| 1986 | #5,459 | 13 | #714 | 161 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #726 | 148 |
| 1984 | — | #749 | 134 | |
| 1983 | — | #731 | 139 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #798 | 123 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #689 | 157 |
| 1980 | — | #661 | 172 | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #658 | 168 |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #721 | 136 |
| 1977 | — | #682 | 154 | |
| 1976 | — | #619 | 175 | |
| 1975 | — | #707 | 137 | |
| 1974 | — | #619 | 169 | |
| 1973 | — | #587 | 182 | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #641 | 153 |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | #573 | 204 |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #594 | 186 |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #548 | 205 |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | #536 | 203 |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | #511 | 216 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #504 | 227 |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #502 | 230 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #467 | 286 |
| 1963 | — | #491 | 267 | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #480 | 276 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #444 | 328 |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | #420 | 358 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #451 | 317 |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | #415 | 356 |
| 1957 | #3,489 | 12 | #392 | 387 |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #359 | 419 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #375 | 371 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #365 | 380 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #331 | 453 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #337 | 422 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | #340 | 404 |
| 1950 | #2,053 | 22 | #319 | 461 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | #330 | 430 |
| 1948 | #2,491 | 16 | #316 | 450 |
| 1947 | #3,706 | 9 | #306 | 510 |
| 1946 | #3,217 | 10 | #289 | 500 |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 | #292 | 417 |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 | #282 | 450 |
| 1943 | #2,079 | 18 | #274 | 495 |
| 1942 | #2,046 | 18 | #268 | 492 |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | #272 | 443 |
| 1940 | #2,963 | 9 | #270 | 430 |
| 1939 | #1,947 | 17 | #266 | 418 |
| 1938 | #2,225 | 14 | #248 | 476 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | #252 | 451 |
| 1936 | #2,263 | 13 | #260 | 428 |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 | #257 | 438 |
| 1934 | #2,567 | 11 | #261 | 430 |
| 1933 | #2,688 | 10 | #254 | 426 |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 | #260 | 436 |
| 1931 | #1,876 | 18 | #251 | 456 |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 | #242 | 523 |
| 1929 | #2,098 | 16 | #231 | 545 |
| 1928 | #1,784 | 22 | #238 | 544 |
| 1927 | #2,095 | 18 | #229 | 579 |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 | #224 | 607 |
| 1925 | #2,018 | 19 | #220 | 613 |
| 1924 | #2,661 | 13 | #216 | 627 |
| 1923 | #1,944 | 20 | #204 | 657 |
| 1922 | #1,836 | 22 | #209 | 625 |
| 1921 | #1,927 | 21 | #203 | 682 |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | #204 | 646 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #198 | 634 |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | #206 | 624 |
| 1917 | #1,996 | 17 | #201 | 574 |
| 1916 | #2,246 | 14 | #200 | 570 |
| 1915 | #1,622 | 21 | #182 | 618 |
| 1914 | #1,896 | 13 | #195 | 426 |
| 1913 | #1,601 | 14 | #174 | 391 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #202 | 282 |
| 1911 | #1,956 | 7 | #184 | 167 |
| 1910 | — | #185 | 147 | |
| 1909 | — | #178 | 131 | |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 | #177 | 123 |
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | #180 | 120 |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #177 | 101 |
| 1905 | — | #181 | 103 | |
| 1904 | — | #172 | 106 | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | #159 | 110 |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | #156 | 112 |
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | #195 | 74 |
| 1900 | — | #173 | 120 | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | #154 | 98 |
| 1898 | — | #169 | 96 | |
| 1897 | — | #157 | 98 | |
| 1896 | #1,122 | 9 | #156 | 106 |
| 1895 | — | #156 | 100 | |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | #182 | 83 |
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | #185 | 79 |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 | #177 | 89 |
| 1891 | — | #188 | 66 | |
| 1890 | — | #190 | 71 | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | #168 | 80 |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | #206 | 71 |
| 1887 | — | #188 | 66 | |
| 1886 | — | #162 | 85 | |
| 1885 | — | #169 | 78 | |
| 1884 | — | #186 | 73 | |
| 1883 | #754 | 7 | #168 | 73 |
| 1882 | — | #159 | 86 | |
| 1881 | — | #193 | 58 | |
| 1880 | — | #209 | 58 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ellis was already there! It came in at #209, and was given to 58 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1891, when fewer than 87 boys a year got the name.
Where Ellis is popular in 1912
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#76 · 1 in 235
- Alabama#95 · 1 in 450
- Louisiana#100 · 1 in 451
- Kentucky#110 · 1 in 588
- North Carolina#112 · 1 in 610
Best ever in a state: #40 in Utah, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #76 | 5 | 1 in 235 |
| Alabama | #95 | 24 | 1 in 450 |
| Louisiana | #100 | 18 | 1 in 451 |
| Kentucky | #110 | 15 | 1 in 588 |
| North Carolina | #112 | 20 | 1 in 610 |
| Mississippi | #114 | 16 | 1 in 556 |
| Arkansas | #131 | 11 | 1 in 576 |
| Georgia | #146 | 16 | 1 in 915 |
| Missouri | #146 | 13 | 1 in 860 |
| Virginia | #151 | 10 | 1 in 976 |
| Tennessee | #169 | 8 | 1 in 1,115 |
| South Carolina | #180 | 8 | 1 in 1,079 |
| Kansas | #187 | 5 | 1 in 1,175 |
| California | #197 | 6 | 1 in 1,357 |
| Pennsylvania | #198 | 16 | 1 in 2,209 |
| Ohio | #213 | 9 | 1 in 1,997 |
| Texas | #242 | 14 | 1 in 1,345 |
| Illinois | #277 | 7 | 1 in 3,198 |
| New York | #382 | 6 | 1 in 7,110 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ellis
- 30 spots since 2024 (#273 → #243)
- 83 spots since 2020 (#326 → #243)
- 179 spots since 2015 (#422 → #243)
- Biggest jump: 115 spots in 2012 (#726 → #611)
- Biggest drop: 141 spots in 2001 (#785 → #926)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1899 at #154 (98 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,084 boys born in 1899 were named Ellis (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,205 boys born in 2025 (0.08%)
- 14.1% of all boys named Ellis (7,098) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 728 | #159 (1882) | #181 |
| 1890s | 886 | #154 (1899) | #171 |
| 1900s | 1,100 | #156 (1902) | #175 |
| 1910s | 4,433 | #174 (1913) | #193 |
| 1920s | 6,125 | #203 (1921) | #218 |
| 1930s | 4,482 | #242 (1930) | #255 |
| 1940s | 4,617 | #268 (1942) | #290 |
| 1950s | 3,970 | #319 (1950) | #368 |
| 1960s | 2,596 | #420 (1960) | #490 |
| 1970s | 1,664 | #573 (1971) | #640 |
| 1980s | 1,514 | #661 (1980) | #732 |
| 1990s | 1,796 | #740 (1991) | #795 |
| 2000s | 2,355 | #720 (2009) | #818 |
| 2010s | 7,098 | #311 (2017) | #478 |
| 2020s | 7,039 | #243 (2025) | #291 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ellis in 1912
Top girls' names in 1912
Top boys' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 69,765 of them was named Ellis, which outranked 37.8% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,981Yoshiko9
- #1,981Zenia9
- #1,981Zoa9
- #2,144Ellis8
- #2,144Abby8
- #2,144Adalene8
- #2,144Adelyn8
- #2,360Adelyne7
- #2,360Agusta7
- #2,360Albirda7
Tied with 215 names at #2,144; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
429,942 boys got a published name in 1912; 1 in 1,525 of them was named Ellis, which outranked 93.0% of the 2,905 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.