Eileen

#654 for girls in 2025, 437 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1943 · 4,092 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
20 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
189,614
since 1882

Eileen over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202005peak #68, 1943girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#654437—
2024#592511—
2023#663444—
2022#621476—
2021#671440—
2020#701401—
2019#701413—
2018#669439—
2017#692421—
2016#727390—
2015#697408—
2014#716391—
2013#752360—
2012#829324—
2011#745369—
2010#837321—
2009#814347—
2008#762386—
2007#734396—
2006#777355—
2005#717381—
2004#737358—
2003#677389—
2002#667380—
2001#619407—
2000#624402—
1999#593414—
1998#552450—
1997#600377—
1996#614373—
1995#603372—
1994#608368—
1993#588401—
1992#579403—
1991#554422—
1990#461529—
1989#466524#6,2297
1988#440515—
1987#464471—
1986#412534—
1985#403560—
1984#373614—
1983#332689—
1982#394584—
1981#386585—
1980#377613—
1979#386570#6,0565
1978#345629—
1977#350630#5,8455
1976#369564—
1975#336662—
1974#308759—
1973#283865—
1972#278918—
1971#2771,036#3,9637
1970#2451,282—
1969#2121,475—
1968#1971,578#3,1078
1967#1801,793#3,2317
1966#1682,039—
1965#1572,418#3,2447
1964#1532,585#2,8549
1963#1412,937#2,41412
1962#1393,057#4,0335
1961#1313,490—
1960#1303,496#2,68510
1959#1263,629#3,2907
1958#1253,526#3,0338
1957#1203,710#2,37512
1956#1233,452#3,5356
1955#1203,503#2,43511
1954#1153,680#3,8275
1953#1083,629#2,9058
1952#1003,742#3,7345
1951#953,816#2,8448
1950#913,883#2,7708
1949#953,722#2,45310
1948#913,838#3,6685
1947#914,251#1,91616
1946#804,168#2,27111
1945#703,637#2,9966
1944#733,649#2,4679
1943#684,092#1,76417
1942#883,108#2,14512
1941#1212,196#2,08312
1940#1252,034#2,32210
1939#1152,158#2,15911
1938#1132,282#3,5345
1937#1072,345#2,4799
1936#1032,320#1,87214
1935#1082,199#2,7198
1934#1092,227#2,9737
1933#1152,004#3,0047
1932#1142,121#2,8498
1931#1062,224#2,10113
1930#1102,378#2,7819
1929#982,558#3,9595
1928#1022,644#3,0768
1927#912,929#3,7806
1926#922,928—
1925#962,964#4,1975
1924#933,070—
1923#952,976—
1922#962,939#4,3075
1921#1002,862#3,8696
1920#1002,718—
1919#1032,346#3,7366
1918#1102,264—
1917#1062,147#3,5456
1916#1181,858—
1915#1321,493—
1914#159920—
1913#184614—
1912#203470—
1911#211336—
1910#240258—
1909#240216—
1908#242199—
1907#266168—
1906#258161—
1905#301124—
1904#294120—
1903#310101—
1902#32491—
1901#32686—
1900#36585—
1899#33977—
1898#34581—
1897#37659—
1896#42446—
1895#42644—
1894#46336—
1893#47332—
1892#46035—
1891#75013—
1890#69315—
1889#56720—
1888#69014—
1887#58615—
1886#57215—
1885#9216—
1884——
1883#9205—
1882#8136—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Eileen! It came in at #813, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Eileen is popular in 2005

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNHWashington: #569 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,936 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #680 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,336 girlsMNIllinois: #396 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 2,035 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMINew York: #465 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 2,438 girlsNYMassachusetts: #457 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,590 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedINOhio: #1,361 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,456 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #494 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,706 girlsNJConnecticut: #503 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,847 girlsCTCalifornia: #432 for girls · 101 births · 1 in 2,281 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedUTColorado: #473 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,248 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNEMissouri: #900 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,802 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,087 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,421 girlsVAMaryland: #441 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,064 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedDEArizona: #745 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,948 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,118 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,566 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedALGeorgia: #826 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,672 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Eileen, so not publishedHITexas: #690 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 4,015 girlsTXFlorida: #919 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,122 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Illinois#396 · 1 in 2,035
  2. California#432 · 1 in 2,281
  3. Maryland#441 · 1 in 2,064
  4. Massachusetts#457 · 1 in 2,590
  5. New York#465 · 1 in 2,438

Best ever in a state: #19 in New Jersey, 1943.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Illinois#396331 in 2,035
California#4321011 in 2,281
Maryland#441121 in 2,064
Massachusetts#457111 in 2,590
New York#465391 in 2,438
Colorado#473111 in 2,248
New Jersey#494151 in 2,706
Connecticut#50351 in 2,847
Washington#569101 in 2,936
Minnesota#68061 in 4,336
Texas#690401 in 4,015
Arizona#74591 in 3,948
Georgia#826111 in 4,672
Missouri#90051 in 5,802
Florida#919141 in 6,122
Virginia#1,08751 in 7,421
North Carolina#1,11861 in 7,566
Ohio#1,36151 in 11,456
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Eileen
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 62 spots since 2024 (#592 → #654)
  • 47 spots since 2020 (#701 → #654)
  • 43 spots since 2015 (#697 → #654)
  • Biggest jump: 349 spots in 1886 (#921 → #572)
  • Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1890 (#567 → #693)
Rise & fade · girls
61 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1943 at #68 (4,092 births)
  • Births halved by 1966, 23 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 20 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 20 yrs · run 1942–1952
  • Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1885–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 341
  • Highest: 1 in 341 girls born in 1943 were named Eileen (0.29%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,678 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 19.3% of all girls named Eileen (36,570) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s81#567 (1889)#724
1890s438#339 (1899)#475
1900s1,351#240 (1909)#293
1910s12,706#103 (1919)#157
1920s28,588#91 (1927)#96
1930s22,258#103 (1936)#110
1940s34,695#68 (1943)#90
1950s36,570#91 (1950)#112
1960s24,868#130 (1960)#161
1970s7,915#245 (1970)#318
1980s5,689#332 (1983)#405
1990s4,109#461 (1990)#575
2000s3,801#619 (2001)#713
2010s3,836#669 (2018)#737
2020s2,709#592 (2024)#650

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Eileen in 2005

girls
#717
381 births · 1 in 4,850 girls

Top girls' names in 2005

  1. #1Emily23,952
  2. #2Emma20,362
  3. #3Madison19,578
  4. #4Abigail15,756
  5. #5Olivia15,700
  6. #6Isabella15,197
  7. #7Hannah14,854
  8. #8Samantha13,642
  9. #9Ava13,606
  10. #10Ashley13,276
  11. #717Eileen381
More about 2005

girls

1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 4,850 of them was named Eileen, which outranked 96.3% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Eileen
  1. #713Liana383
  2. #715Cassie382
  3. #715Lesley382
  4. #717Eileen381
  5. #717Makena381
  6. #717Ryann381
  7. #720Sydnee380
  8. #721Kaila379
  9. #721Tianna379

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2004
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,271Mikalah#7,077 → #806
  2. ↑ 2,724Yuridia#3,689 → #965
  3. ↑ 2,236Naima#3,127 → #891
  4. ↑ 1,924Karol#2,742 → #818
  5. ↑ 1,125Karma#1,972 → #847
Fallers
  1. ↓ 397Rhea#908 → #1,305
  2. ↓ 360Laisha#789 → #1,149
  3. ↓ 334Ashtyn#956 → #1,290
  4. ↓ 285Hunter#742 → #1,027
  5. ↓ 282Angeles#973 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2005 →