Edmond
Last seen for girls in 1968 at #5,642 · #2,006 for boys in 2025, 75 births
Given to boys >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1883 · 52 births
- Debut · boys
- 44 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 24,893since 1880
Edmond over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Edmond has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,006 | 75 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,261 | 63 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,362 | 58 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,965 | 78 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,109 | 68 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,212 | 62 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,954 | 75 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,937 | 76 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,170 | 62 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,047 | 69 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,910 | 76 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,844 | 80 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,866 | 76 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,787 | 83 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,145 | 61 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,957 | 71 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,910 | 75 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,104 | 65 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,539 | 102 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,790 | 77 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,869 | 68 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,565 | 84 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,646 | 76 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,514 | 82 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,527 | 79 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,391 | 90 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,604 | 67 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,246 | 97 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,326 | 85 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,480 | 68 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,102 | 106 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,135 | 100 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,104 | 103 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,043 | 110 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,103 | 98 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,111 | 93 | |
| 1989 | — | #975 | 110 | |
| 1988 | — | #847 | 126 | |
| 1987 | — | #914 | 106 | |
| 1986 | — | #947 | 93 | |
| 1985 | — | #832 | 116 | |
| 1984 | — | #784 | 122 | |
| 1983 | — | #848 | 106 | |
| 1982 | — | #723 | 143 | |
| 1981 | — | #721 | 144 | |
| 1980 | — | #690 | 158 | |
| 1979 | — | #607 | 200 | |
| 1978 | — | #598 | 195 | |
| 1977 | — | #658 | 165 | |
| 1976 | — | #746 | 124 | |
| 1975 | — | #718 | 134 | |
| 1974 | — | #761 | 113 | |
| 1973 | — | #678 | 138 | |
| 1972 | — | #707 | 128 | |
| 1971 | — | #644 | 163 | |
| 1970 | — | #591 | 189 | |
| 1969 | — | #576 | 185 | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | #561 | 182 |
| 1967 | — | #555 | 181 | |
| 1966 | — | #567 | 179 | |
| 1965 | — | #533 | 208 | |
| 1964 | — | #545 | 209 | |
| 1963 | — | #502 | 255 | |
| 1962 | — | #517 | 233 | |
| 1961 | — | #509 | 243 | |
| 1960 | — | #483 | 269 | |
| 1959 | — | #479 | 265 | |
| 1958 | — | #480 | 265 | |
| 1957 | — | #430 | 324 | |
| 1956 | — | #420 | 321 | |
| 1955 | — | #397 | 335 | |
| 1954 | — | #411 | 306 | |
| 1953 | — | #376 | 337 | |
| 1952 | — | #402 | 296 | |
| 1951 | — | #368 | 346 | |
| 1950 | — | #380 | 317 | |
| 1949 | — | #391 | 293 | |
| 1948 | — | #350 | 366 | |
| 1947 | — | #365 | 354 | |
| 1946 | — | #367 | 314 | |
| 1945 | — | #362 | 269 | |
| 1944 | — | #366 | 271 | |
| 1943 | — | #342 | 322 | |
| 1942 | — | #354 | 296 | |
| 1941 | — | #346 | 282 | |
| 1940 | — | #344 | 273 | |
| 1939 | — | #330 | 281 | |
| 1938 | — | #346 | 260 | |
| 1937 | — | #334 | 264 | |
| 1936 | — | #302 | 312 | |
| 1935 | — | #326 | 278 | |
| 1934 | — | #320 | 287 | |
| 1933 | — | #317 | 289 | |
| 1932 | — | #322 | 294 | |
| 1931 | — | #307 | 316 | |
| 1930 | — | #301 | 360 | |
| 1929 | — | #309 | 319 | |
| 1928 | — | #279 | 406 | |
| 1927 | — | #294 | 377 | |
| 1926 | — | #292 | 376 | |
| 1925 | — | #286 | 400 | |
| 1924 | — | #286 | 402 | |
| 1923 | — | #306 | 343 | |
| 1922 | — | #281 | 388 | |
| 1921 | — | #279 | 398 | |
| 1920 | — | #263 | 433 | |
| 1919 | — | #267 | 396 | |
| 1918 | — | #261 | 427 | |
| 1917 | — | #268 | 358 | |
| 1916 | — | #259 | 365 | |
| 1915 | — | #271 | 323 | |
| 1914 | — | #265 | 269 | |
| 1913 | — | #273 | 200 | |
| 1912 | — | #250 | 200 | |
| 1911 | — | #273 | 91 | |
| 1910 | — | #239 | 98 | |
| 1909 | — | #268 | 68 | |
| 1908 | — | #219 | 88 | |
| 1907 | — | #254 | 68 | |
| 1906 | — | #273 | 52 | |
| 1905 | — | #284 | 48 | |
| 1904 | — | #260 | 53 | |
| 1903 | — | #282 | 44 | |
| 1902 | — | #267 | 49 | |
| 1901 | — | #267 | 41 | |
| 1900 | — | #305 | 47 | |
| 1899 | — | #266 | 41 | |
| 1898 | — | #279 | 42 | |
| 1897 | — | #253 | 47 | |
| 1896 | — | #237 | 58 | |
| 1895 | — | #254 | 50 | |
| 1894 | — | #240 | 50 | |
| 1893 | — | #246 | 50 | |
| 1892 | — | #289 | 40 | |
| 1891 | — | #251 | 40 | |
| 1890 | — | #233 | 51 | |
| 1889 | — | #244 | 44 | |
| 1888 | — | #273 | 43 | |
| 1887 | — | #270 | 36 | |
| 1886 | — | #235 | 50 | |
| 1885 | — | #277 | 36 | |
| 1884 | — | #259 | 43 | |
| 1883 | — | #208 | 52 | |
| 1882 | — | #273 | 39 | |
| 1881 | — | #237 | 42 | |
| 1880 | — | #249 | 44 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Edmond was already there! It came in at #249, and was given to 44 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1895, when fewer than 53 boys a year got the name.
Where Edmond is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Hampshire#74 · 1 in 398
- Vermont#96 · 1 in 482
- Rhode Island#115 · 1 in 927
- Massachusetts#115 · 1 in 1,166
- Maine#163 · 1 in 993
Best ever in a state: #52 in New Hampshire, 1923.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #74 | 8 | 1 in 398 |
| Vermont | #96 | 5 | 1 in 482 |
| Massachusetts | #115 | 27 | 1 in 1,166 |
| Rhode Island | #115 | 5 | 1 in 927 |
| Maine | #163 | 6 | 1 in 993 |
| Connecticut | #177 | 5 | 1 in 2,285 |
| Louisiana | #193 | 18 | 1 in 1,056 |
| New Jersey | #204 | 10 | 1 in 2,894 |
| Florida | #211 | 8 | 1 in 1,445 |
| New York | #211 | 37 | 1 in 2,571 |
| Virginia | #248 | 10 | 1 in 2,178 |
| Oklahoma | #260 | 10 | 1 in 2,182 |
| Alabama | #261 | 12 | 1 in 2,233 |
| Tennessee | #278 | 9 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Pennsylvania | #285 | 18 | 1 in 4,463 |
| North Carolina | #287 | 12 | 1 in 2,764 |
| Iowa | #288 | 5 | 1 in 3,777 |
| Michigan | #314 | 9 | 1 in 4,682 |
| Georgia | #332 | 8 | 1 in 3,366 |
| Indiana | #335 | 5 | 1 in 5,009 |
| West Virginia | #335 | 5 | 1 in 3,347 |
| Missouri | #337 | 6 | 1 in 4,532 |
| Mississippi | #342 | 6 | 1 in 3,144 |
| Kentucky | #355 | 7 | 1 in 3,504 |
| California | #366 | 9 | 1 in 4,041 |
| Illinois | #383 | 8 | 1 in 7,135 |
| Ohio | #405 | 6 | 1 in 8,460 |
| Texas | #447 | 15 | 1 in 3,859 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Edmond
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 255 spots since 2024 (#2,261 → #2,006)
- 206 spots since 2020 (#2,212 → #2,006)
- 96 spots since 2015 (#1,910 → #2,006)
- Biggest jump: 88 spots in 1977 (#746 → #658)
- Biggest drop: 136 spots in 1990 (#975 → #1,111)
Rise & fade · boys
3 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #208 (52 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 110 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 110 yrs · run 1880–1989
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,754
- Highest: 1 in 1,754 boys born in 1908 were named Edmond (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,774 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #208 in 1883, was only 1 in 2,012 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 15.4% of all boys named Edmond (3,842) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 429 | #208 (1883) | #253 |
| 1890s | 469 | #233 (1890) | #255 |
| 1900s | 558 | #219 (1908) | #268 |
| 1910s | 2,727 | #239 (1910) | #263 |
| 1920s | 3,842 | #263 (1920) | #288 |
| 1930s | 2,941 | #301 (1930) | #321 |
| 1940s | 3,040 | #342 (1943) | #359 |
| 1950s | 3,112 | #368 (1951) | #414 |
| 1960s | 2,144 | #483 (1960) | #535 |
| 1970s | 1,549 | #591 (1970) | #671 |
| 1980s | 1,224 | #690 (1980) | #828 |
| 1990s | 927 | #1,043 (1992) | #1,225 |
| 2000s | 798 | #1,391 (2000) | #1,686 |
| 2010s | 729 | #1,787 (2012) | #1,962 |
| 2020s | 404 | #1,965 (2022) | #2,153 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Edmond in 1929
boys
#309
319 births · 1 in 3,372 boys
Top boys' names in 1929
More about 1929
boys
1,075,615 boys got a published name in 1929; 1 in 3,372 of them was named Edmond, which outranked 93.2% of the 4,545 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Edmond
Biggest movers since 1928
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.