Dynasty
#5,238 for girls in 2025, 24 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2001 · 161 births
- Debut · girls
- 18 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,369since 1981
Dynasty over time
Rank among girls' names. Dynasty has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,238 | 24 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,893 | 27 | #12,349 | 5 |
| 2023 | #4,655 | 29 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,041 | 36 | — | |
| 2021 | #4,326 | 32 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,141 | 50 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,172 | 50 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #2,869 | 58 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,247 | 49 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,010 | 55 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,403 | 32 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,350 | 33 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,837 | 60 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,419 | 47 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,132 | 53 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,075 | 54 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,446 | 78 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,157 | 93 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,971 | 104 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,878 | 108 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,767 | 111 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,962 | 95 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,813 | 103 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,654 | 111 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,241 | 161 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,827 | 94 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,424 | 60 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,429 | 57 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,328 | 57 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,849 | 42 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,028 | 67 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,412 | 53 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,990 | 39 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,830 | 42 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,301 | 33 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,523 | 30 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,566 | 28 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,598 | 14 | — | |
| 1987 | #4,474 | 18 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,028 | 20 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | — | |
| 1984 | #5,222 | 13 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,162 | 18 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Dynasty! It came in at #4,162, and was given to 18 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1982–1985, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
See more about Dynasty
- 345 spots since 2024 (#4,893 → #5,238)
- 2,097 spots since 2020 (#3,141 → #5,238)
- 835 spots since 2015 (#4,403 → #5,238)
- Debuted 1981
- Peaked 2001 at #1,241 (161 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 11,184 girls born in 2001 were named Dynasty (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 66,969 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 44.7% of all girls named Dynasty (1,058) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 142 | #3,566 (1989) | #5,092 |
| 1990s | 480 | #2,028 (1995) | #2,711 |
| 2000s | 1,058 | #1,241 (2001) | #1,872 |
| 2010s | 491 | #2,837 (2013) | #3,351 |
| 2020s | 198 | #3,141 (2020) | #4,382 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dynasty in 1981
Top girls' names in 1981
More about 1981
girls
1,668,060 girls got a published name in 1981; 1 in 92,670 of them was named Dynasty, which outranked 65.9% of the 12,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,005Venetia19
- #4,005Vincenza19
- #4,005Yashira19
- #4,162Dynasty18
- #4,162Adelaide18
- #4,162Africa18
- #4,162Aimie18
- #4,344Ahsley17
- #4,344Ainsley17
- #4,344Alayne17
Tied with 181 names at #4,162; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.