Don
Last seen for girls in 1992 at #13,317 · #1,793 for boys in 2025, 89 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1934 · 3,926 births
- Debut · boys
- 34 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 24 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 167,632since 1880
Don over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,793 | 89 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,776 | 92 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,744 | 94 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,551 | 115 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,635 | 102 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,716 | 90 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,762 | 88 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,498 | 115 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,725 | 90 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,563 | 105 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,444 | 117 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,456 | 112 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,352 | 125 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,617 | 96 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,448 | 113 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,470 | 111 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,290 | 136 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,303 | 133 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,332 | 127 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,054 | 170 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,155 | 138 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,128 | 140 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,016 | 155 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,003 | 155 | |
| 2001 | — | #873 | 183 | |
| 2000 | — | #829 | 193 | |
| 1999 | — | #816 | 187 | |
| 1998 | — | #767 | 207 | |
| 1997 | — | #767 | 194 | |
| 1996 | — | #694 | 233 | |
| 1995 | — | #596 | 299 | |
| 1994 | — | #683 | 231 | |
| 1993 | — | #587 | 309 | |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #601 | 293 |
| 1991 | — | #538 | 353 | |
| 1990 | — | #554 | 332 | |
| 1989 | — | #483 | 393 | |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | #425 | 454 |
| 1987 | — | #412 | 449 | |
| 1986 | — | #390 | 467 | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #381 | 473 |
| 1984 | — | #373 | 472 | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #367 | 478 |
| 1982 | — | #341 | 552 | |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | #298 | 653 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #321 | 598 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #303 | 654 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #306 | 587 |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | #268 | 732 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #269 | 718 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #258 | 766 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #252 | 798 |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | #237 | 893 |
| 1972 | #4,091 | 14 | #223 | 977 |
| 1971 | #4,311 | 13 | #215 | 1,092 |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | #203 | 1,279 |
| 1969 | #3,461 | 16 | #194 | 1,349 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | #183 | 1,404 |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | #177 | 1,469 |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | #166 | 1,650 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 | #157 | 1,907 |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | #141 | 2,304 |
| 1963 | #3,336 | 15 | #135 | 2,522 |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #123 | 2,915 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #121 | 3,149 |
| 1960 | #2,820 | 19 | #115 | 3,454 |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | #111 | 3,617 |
| 1958 | #2,972 | 16 | #112 | 3,580 |
| 1957 | #2,823 | 17 | #117 | 3,347 |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | #123 | 2,898 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #125 | 2,649 |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | #120 | 2,748 |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | #121 | 2,712 |
| 1952 | #3,372 | 11 | #120 | 2,570 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #117 | 2,619 |
| 1950 | #2,535 | 16 | #107 | 2,712 |
| 1949 | #2,726 | 14 | #98 | 3,060 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | #91 | 3,546 |
| 1947 | #2,089 | 22 | #86 | 4,007 |
| 1946 | #2,094 | 20 | #79 | 4,110 |
| 1945 | #2,237 | 15 | #73 | 3,482 |
| 1944 | #1,967 | 19 | #72 | 3,589 |
| 1943 | #2,352 | 15 | #72 | 3,817 |
| 1942 | #1,981 | 19 | #72 | 3,564 |
| 1941 | #2,190 | 15 | #66 | 3,533 |
| 1940 | #1,900 | 18 | #62 | 3,547 |
| 1939 | #1,684 | 21 | #56 | 3,589 |
| 1938 | #1,945 | 17 | #52 | 3,900 |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | #51 | 3,814 |
| 1936 | #1,413 | 27 | #51 | 3,830 |
| 1935 | #1,663 | 21 | #51 | 3,917 |
| 1934 | #1,518 | 24 | #50 | 3,926 |
| 1933 | #1,606 | 22 | #54 | 3,453 |
| 1932 | #1,176 | 37 | #55 | 3,453 |
| 1931 | #1,127 | 40 | #59 | 3,176 |
| 1930 | #1,289 | 34 | #68 | 2,922 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | #78 | 2,519 |
| 1928 | #1,469 | 29 | #84 | 2,382 |
| 1927 | #1,404 | 33 | #90 | 2,303 |
| 1926 | #1,623 | 26 | #96 | 1,966 |
| 1925 | #2,119 | 18 | #106 | 1,653 |
| 1924 | #1,723 | 25 | #125 | 1,451 |
| 1923 | #2,021 | 19 | #129 | 1,293 |
| 1922 | #2,109 | 18 | #136 | 1,183 |
| 1921 | #1,927 | 21 | #136 | 1,172 |
| 1920 | #2,590 | 13 | #148 | 1,019 |
| 1919 | #2,640 | 12 | #145 | 956 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #153 | 931 |
| 1917 | #1,996 | 17 | #167 | 757 |
| 1916 | #2,658 | 11 | #160 | 744 |
| 1915 | #2,526 | 11 | #156 | 747 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #173 | 521 |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | #176 | 388 |
| 1912 | #1,844 | 10 | #176 | 332 |
| 1911 | — | #184 | 167 | |
| 1910 | — | #191 | 140 | |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | #197 | 110 |
| 1908 | — | #193 | 107 | |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | #227 | 81 |
| 1906 | — | #203 | 87 | |
| 1905 | — | #205 | 85 | |
| 1904 | — | #213 | 75 | |
| 1903 | — | #228 | 64 | |
| 1902 | — | #200 | 79 | |
| 1901 | — | #249 | 48 | |
| 1900 | — | #219 | 81 | |
| 1899 | — | #202 | 65 | |
| 1898 | — | #252 | 49 | |
| 1897 | — | #249 | 49 | |
| 1896 | — | #221 | 66 | |
| 1895 | — | #190 | 78 | |
| 1894 | — | #202 | 72 | |
| 1893 | — | #212 | 64 | |
| 1892 | — | #213 | 68 | |
| 1891 | — | #233 | 48 | |
| 1890 | — | #212 | 61 | |
| 1889 | — | #205 | 62 | |
| 1888 | — | #245 | 50 | |
| 1887 | — | #254 | 39 | |
| 1886 | — | #216 | 61 | |
| 1885 | — | #282 | 35 | |
| 1884 | — | #251 | 47 | |
| 1883 | — | #203 | 54 | |
| 1882 | — | #248 | 46 | |
| 1881 | — | #318 | 26 | |
| 1880 | — | #283 | 34 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Don was already there! It came in at #283, and was given to 34 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 35 boys a year got the name.
See more about Don
- 17 spots since 2024 (#1,776 → #1,793)
- 77 spots since 2020 (#1,716 → #1,793)
- 349 spots since 2015 (#1,444 → #1,793)
- Biggest jump: 87 spots in 1995 (#683 → #596)
- Biggest drop: 130 spots in 2002 (#873 → #1,003)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1934 at #50 (3,926 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 31 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 24 yrs · run 1926–1949
- Top 1,000: 122 yrs · run 1880–2001
- Highest: 1 in 263 boys born in 1934 were named Don (0.38%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,192 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 21.6% of all boys named Don (36,255) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 454 | #203 (1883) | #251 |
| 1890s | 620 | #190 (1895) | #219 |
| 1900s | 817 | #193 (1908) | #213 |
| 1910s | 5,683 | #145 (1919) | #168 |
| 1920s | 16,941 | #78 (1929) | #113 |
| 1930s | 35,980 | #50 (1934) | #55 |
| 1940s | 36,255 | #62 (1940) | #77 |
| 1950s | 29,452 | #107 (1950) | #117 |
| 1960s | 22,123 | #115 (1960) | #151 |
| 1970s | 8,496 | #203 (1970) | #253 |
| 1980s | 4,989 | #298 (1981) | #379 |
| 1990s | 2,638 | #538 (1991) | #660 |
| 2000s | 1,530 | #829 (2000) | #1,098 |
| 2010s | 1,072 | #1,352 (2013) | #1,534 |
| 2020s | 582 | #1,551 (2022) | #1,703 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Don in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 196,660 of them was named Don, which outranked 43.8% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,011Yolando11
- #4,011Yolinda11
- #4,011Zanetta11
- #4,263Don10
- #4,263Adora10
- #4,263Albertine10
- #4,263Alesha10
- #4,533Adaline9
- #4,533Adrea9
- #4,533Ailene9
Tied with 269 names at #4,263; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 710 of them was named Don, which outranked 97.3% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.