Dominick
Last seen for girls in 2012 at #14,962 · #622 for boys in 2025, 448 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1914 · 424 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 67,180since 1881
Dominick over time
Rank among boys' names. Dominick has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #622 | 448 | |
| 2024 | — | #550 | 541 | |
| 2023 | — | #553 | 529 | |
| 2022 | — | #523 | 567 | |
| 2021 | — | #484 | 616 | |
| 2020 | — | #446 | 670 | |
| 2019 | — | #430 | 714 | |
| 2018 | — | #410 | 779 | |
| 2017 | — | #362 | 908 | |
| 2016 | — | #337 | 1,033 | |
| 2015 | — | #318 | 1,113 | |
| 2014 | — | #309 | 1,129 | |
| 2013 | — | #275 | 1,286 | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #262 | 1,364 |
| 2011 | — | #268 | 1,296 | |
| 2010 | — | #261 | 1,325 | |
| 2009 | — | #246 | 1,440 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #239 | 1,542 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #226 | 1,631 |
| 2006 | — | #215 | 1,734 | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #214 | 1,689 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #217 | 1,605 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #205 | 1,780 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #224 | 1,556 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #276 | 1,110 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #271 | 1,190 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #265 | 1,134 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #264 | 1,096 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #258 | 1,097 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #289 | 933 |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | #302 | 882 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 | #303 | 884 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #302 | 905 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #317 | 821 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #366 | 643 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #393 | 590 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #395 | 551 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #412 | 480 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #427 | 423 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #419 | 419 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #413 | 423 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #430 | 376 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #478 | 311 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #461 | 342 |
| 1981 | — | #459 | 326 | |
| 1980 | — | #467 | 322 | |
| 1979 | — | #451 | 322 | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | #443 | 320 |
| 1977 | — | #448 | 319 | |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #477 | 275 |
| 1975 | — | #472 | 291 | |
| 1974 | — | #499 | 253 | |
| 1973 | — | #483 | 266 | |
| 1972 | — | #472 | 277 | |
| 1971 | — | #513 | 253 | |
| 1970 | — | #467 | 301 | |
| 1969 | — | #432 | 335 | |
| 1968 | — | #456 | 282 | |
| 1967 | — | #472 | 256 | |
| 1966 | — | #430 | 315 | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #439 | 307 |
| 1964 | — | #451 | 313 | |
| 1963 | — | #434 | 337 | |
| 1962 | — | #461 | 299 | |
| 1961 | — | #455 | 313 | |
| 1960 | — | #431 | 346 | |
| 1959 | — | #439 | 329 | |
| 1958 | — | #426 | 340 | |
| 1957 | — | #436 | 313 | |
| 1956 | — | #415 | 337 | |
| 1955 | — | #398 | 332 | |
| 1954 | — | #403 | 315 | |
| 1953 | — | #389 | 324 | |
| 1952 | — | #376 | 329 | |
| 1951 | — | #385 | 311 | |
| 1950 | — | #419 | 257 | |
| 1949 | — | #425 | 256 | |
| 1948 | — | #413 | 267 | |
| 1947 | — | #404 | 288 | |
| 1946 | — | #409 | 242 | |
| 1945 | — | #390 | 235 | |
| 1944 | — | #373 | 257 | |
| 1943 | — | #365 | 282 | |
| 1942 | — | #340 | 320 | |
| 1941 | — | #353 | 273 | |
| 1940 | — | #372 | 236 | |
| 1939 | — | #375 | 231 | |
| 1938 | — | #367 | 234 | |
| 1937 | — | #342 | 250 | |
| 1936 | — | #351 | 237 | |
| 1935 | — | #331 | 271 | |
| 1934 | — | #343 | 254 | |
| 1933 | — | #306 | 308 | |
| 1932 | — | #284 | 366 | |
| 1931 | — | #280 | 390 | |
| 1930 | — | #277 | 423 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #259 | 465 |
| 1928 | — | #260 | 474 | |
| 1927 | — | #255 | 501 | |
| 1926 | — | #261 | 465 | |
| 1925 | — | #244 | 538 | |
| 1924 | — | #235 | 579 | |
| 1923 | — | #227 | 580 | |
| 1922 | — | #239 | 548 | |
| 1921 | — | #232 | 575 | |
| 1920 | — | #225 | 564 | |
| 1919 | — | #238 | 489 | |
| 1918 | — | #210 | 594 | |
| 1917 | — | #218 | 508 | |
| 1916 | — | #201 | 567 | |
| 1915 | — | #208 | 521 | |
| 1914 | — | #197 | 424 | |
| 1913 | — | #204 | 325 | |
| 1912 | — | #203 | 275 | |
| 1911 | — | #235 | 119 | |
| 1910 | — | #249 | 93 | |
| 1909 | — | #226 | 91 | |
| 1908 | — | #272 | 62 | |
| 1907 | — | #266 | 62 | |
| 1906 | — | #309 | 44 | |
| 1905 | — | #370 | 31 | |
| 1904 | — | #390 | 28 | |
| 1903 | — | #322 | 34 | |
| 1902 | — | #490 | 19 | |
| 1901 | — | #334 | 29 | |
| 1900 | — | #455 | 25 | |
| 1899 | — | #315 | 31 | |
| 1898 | — | #505 | 17 | |
| 1897 | — | #392 | 23 | |
| 1896 | — | #534 | 15 | |
| 1895 | — | #529 | 15 | |
| 1894 | — | #464 | 18 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #635 | 9 | |
| 1890 | — | #566 | 12 | |
| 1889 | — | #498 | 14 | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #752 | 7 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | #836 | 6 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Dominick! It came in at #781, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Dominick is popular in 2012
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Vermont#66 · 1 in 178
- Delaware#116 · 1 in 355
- New York#157 · 1 in 796
- Nevada#162 · 1 in 604
- New Jersey#164 · 1 in 782
Best ever in a state: #44 in New Jersey, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #66 | 10 | 1 in 178 |
| Delaware | #116 | 10 | 1 in 355 |
| New York | #157 | 131 | 1 in 796 |
| Nevada | #162 | 22 | 1 in 604 |
| New Jersey | #164 | 53 | 1 in 782 |
| Arizona | #175 | 55 | 1 in 673 |
| Pennsylvania | #179 | 74 | 1 in 814 |
| Connecticut | #186 | 17 | 1 in 845 |
| South Dakota | #205 | 6 | 1 in 680 |
| Alaska | #215 | 5 | 1 in 673 |
| California | #222 | 212 | 1 in 1,087 |
| Illinois | #231 | 58 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Michigan | #232 | 44 | 1 in 1,083 |
| Florida | #239 | 74 | 1 in 1,243 |
| Wisconsin | #241 | 25 | 1 in 1,092 |
| New Mexico | #242 | 10 | 1 in 970 |
| Indiana | #258 | 31 | 1 in 1,151 |
| Virginia | #259 | 33 | 1 in 1,267 |
| Colorado | #262 | 25 | 1 in 1,086 |
| Maryland | #265 | 21 | 1 in 1,321 |
| Utah | #266 | 21 | 1 in 1,031 |
| Missouri | #270 | 25 | 1 in 1,270 |
| Ohio | #270 | 42 | 1 in 1,423 |
| Texas | #281 | 126 | 1 in 1,410 |
| West Virginia | #283 | 6 | 1 in 1,391 |
| Oregon | #293 | 15 | 1 in 1,205 |
| Louisiana | #313 | 17 | 1 in 1,422 |
| Washington | #326 | 23 | 1 in 1,562 |
| Kansas | #337 | 11 | 1 in 1,463 |
| Massachusetts | #351 | 13 | 1 in 2,281 |
| Minnesota | #354 | 14 | 1 in 1,978 |
| Georgia | #360 | 28 | 1 in 1,929 |
| Nebraska | #361 | 6 | 1 in 1,649 |
| Oklahoma | #368 | 12 | 1 in 1,688 |
| Tennessee | #386 | 17 | 1 in 2,105 |
| North Carolina | #444 | 18 | 1 in 2,809 |
| Iowa | #468 | 6 | 1 in 2,520 |
| South Carolina | #469 | 8 | 1 in 2,614 |
| Mississippi | #520 | 5 | 1 in 2,691 |
| Alabama | #572 | 6 | 1 in 3,700 |
| Kentucky | #593 | 5 | 1 in 4,436 |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dominick
- 72 spots since 2024 (#550 → #622)
- 176 spots since 2020 (#446 → #622)
- 304 spots since 2015 (#318 → #622)
- Biggest jump: 223 spots in 1883 (#943 → #720)
- Biggest drop: 162 spots in 1882 (#781 → #943)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1914 at #197 (424 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 142 yrs · run 1889–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,110 boys born in 2003 were named Dominick (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,813 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #197 in 1914, was only 1 in 1,544 (0.06%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 22.7% of all boys named Dominick (15,277) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | #498 (1889) | #755 |
| 1890s | 166 | #315 (1899) | #506 |
| 1900s | 425 | #226 (1909) | #343 |
| 1910s | 3,915 | #197 (1914) | #216 |
| 1920s | 5,289 | #225 (1920) | #244 |
| 1930s | 2,964 | #277 (1930) | #326 |
| 1940s | 2,656 | #340 (1942) | #384 |
| 1950s | 3,187 | #376 (1952) | #409 |
| 1960s | 3,103 | #430 (1966) | #446 |
| 1970s | 2,877 | #443 (1978) | #473 |
| 1980s | 3,973 | #395 (1989) | #436 |
| 1990s | 8,985 | #258 (1997) | #306 |
| 2000s | 15,277 | #205 (2003) | #233 |
| 2010s | 10,947 | #261 (2010) | #323 |
| 2020s | 3,371 | #446 (2020) | #530 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dominick in 2012
Top girls' names in 2012
Top boys' names in 2012
More about 2012
girls
1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 293,509 of them was named Dominick, which outranked 23.4% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #13,483Zurisaday7
- #13,483Zyara7
- #13,483Zyrielle7
- #14,962Dominick6
- #14,962Aadhira6
- #14,962Aahna6
- #14,962Aalyssa6
- #16,869Aabha5
- #16,869Aadi5
- #16,869Aadison5
Tied with 1,906 names at #14,962; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,896,946 boys got a published name in 2012; 1 in 1,391 of them was named Dominick, which outranked 98.2% of the 14,250 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.