Deborah
#862 for girls in 2025, 313 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1955 · 52,318 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 742,820since 1880
Deborah over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #862 | 313 | — | |
| 2024 | #852 | 317 | — | |
| 2023 | #967 | 267 | — | |
| 2022 | #910 | 301 | — | |
| 2021 | #910 | 295 | — | |
| 2020 | #904 | 291 | — | |
| 2019 | #899 | 296 | — | |
| 2018 | #781 | 350 | — | |
| 2017 | #773 | 357 | — | |
| 2016 | #822 | 349 | — | |
| 2015 | #804 | 350 | — | |
| 2014 | #752 | 373 | — | |
| 2013 | #815 | 330 | — | |
| 2012 | #793 | 337 | — | |
| 2011 | #810 | 332 | — | |
| 2010 | #774 | 355 | — | |
| 2009 | #817 | 346 | — | |
| 2008 | #808 | 356 | — | |
| 2007 | #777 | 372 | — | |
| 2006 | #672 | 425 | — | |
| 2005 | #652 | 425 | — | |
| 2004 | #639 | 427 | — | |
| 2003 | #632 | 423 | — | |
| 2002 | #559 | 474 | — | |
| 2001 | #543 | 490 | — | |
| 2000 | #493 | 546 | — | |
| 1999 | #496 | 524 | — | |
| 1998 | #465 | 554 | — | |
| 1997 | #411 | 638 | — | |
| 1996 | #410 | 635 | — | |
| 1995 | #398 | 659 | — | |
| 1994 | #355 | 738 | — | |
| 1993 | #328 | 798 | — | |
| 1992 | #303 | 919 | — | |
| 1991 | #271 | 1,014 | — | |
| 1990 | #262 | 1,095 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #251 | 1,076 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #250 | 1,056 | — | |
| 1987 | #222 | 1,203 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #202 | 1,287 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #192 | 1,400 | #5,147 | 7 |
| 1984 | #187 | 1,468 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #171 | 1,609 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #160 | 1,840 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #148 | 1,907 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #146 | 1,937 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #132 | 2,180 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #118 | 2,479 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #109 | 2,676 | #2,202 | 21 |
| 1976 | #96 | 2,992 | #2,508 | 17 |
| 1975 | #86 | 3,414 | #2,637 | 15 |
| 1974 | #68 | 4,343 | #2,129 | 20 |
| 1973 | #56 | 4,980 | #1,586 | 30 |
| 1972 | #43 | 6,271 | #1,871 | 23 |
| 1971 | #33 | 8,675 | #1,415 | 36 |
| 1970 | #33 | 9,845 | #1,615 | 28 |
| 1969 | #27 | 11,187 | #1,414 | 32 |
| 1968 | #27 | 12,288 | #1,314 | 34 |
| 1967 | #22 | 14,012 | #1,030 | 50 |
| 1966 | #14 | 16,250 | #1,090 | 46 |
| 1965 | #13 | 17,081 | #1,129 | 44 |
| 1964 | #12 | 19,306 | #967 | 62 |
| 1963 | #13 | 21,053 | #1,037 | 53 |
| 1962 | #9 | 22,889 | #1,069 | 51 |
| 1961 | #10 | 24,107 | #1,042 | 56 |
| 1960 | #10 | 25,266 | #944 | 64 |
| 1959 | #9 | 29,546 | #919 | 69 |
| 1958 | #7 | 32,943 | #863 | 77 |
| 1957 | #6 | 40,096 | #823 | 84 |
| 1956 | #4 | 47,834 | #762 | 93 |
| 1955 | #2 | 52,318 | #728 | 100 |
| 1954 | #3 | 54,674 | #807 | 80 |
| 1953 | #3 | 52,199 | #786 | 82 |
| 1952 | #4 | 49,811 | #726 | 94 |
| 1951 | #4 | 42,053 | #892 | 62 |
| 1950 | #7 | 29,063 | #1,022 | 47 |
| 1949 | #15 | 19,209 | #1,380 | 28 |
| 1948 | #30 | 11,244 | #1,430 | 26 |
| 1947 | #62 | 5,837 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #119 | 2,471 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | #161 | 1,462 | — | |
| 1944 | #168 | 1,293 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #241 | 785 | #3,231 | 6 |
| 1942 | #265 | 676 | — | |
| 1941 | #259 | 607 | — | |
| 1940 | #290 | 470 | — | |
| 1939 | #293 | 443 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #308 | 410 | — | |
| 1937 | #358 | 322 | — | |
| 1936 | #366 | 300 | — | |
| 1935 | #378 | 281 | — | |
| 1934 | #383 | 280 | — | |
| 1933 | #409 | 242 | — | |
| 1932 | #455 | 207 | — | |
| 1931 | #524 | 158 | — | |
| 1930 | #529 | 165 | — | |
| 1929 | #534 | 161 | — | |
| 1928 | #618 | 130 | — | |
| 1927 | #757 | 91 | — | |
| 1926 | #673 | 116 | — | |
| 1925 | #819 | 82 | — | |
| 1924 | #663 | 125 | — | |
| 1923 | #683 | 118 | — | |
| 1922 | #866 | 71 | — | |
| 1921 | #753 | 94 | — | |
| 1920 | #797 | 82 | — | |
| 1919 | #833 | 70 | — | |
| 1918 | #743 | 92 | — | |
| 1917 | #746 | 89 | — | |
| 1916 | #718 | 90 | — | |
| 1915 | #644 | 105 | — | |
| 1914 | #726 | 62 | — | |
| 1913 | #810 | 42 | — | |
| 1912 | #890 | 32 | — | |
| 1911 | #722 | 36 | — | |
| 1910 | #737 | 33 | — | |
| 1909 | #791 | 26 | — | |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 | — | |
| 1907 | #819 | 21 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #872 | 18 | — | |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 | — | |
| 1903 | #734 | 21 | — | |
| 1902 | #756 | 21 | — | |
| 1901 | #699 | 21 | — | |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | — | |
| 1899 | #983 | 11 | — | |
| 1898 | #719 | 21 | — | |
| 1897 | #644 | 23 | — | |
| 1896 | #754 | 18 | — | |
| 1895 | #893 | 13 | — | |
| 1894 | #697 | 18 | — | |
| 1893 | #571 | 24 | — | |
| 1892 | #726 | 16 | — | |
| 1891 | #695 | 15 | — | |
| 1890 | #538 | 24 | — | |
| 1889 | #757 | 12 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #586 | 15 | — | |
| 1886 | #731 | 10 | — | |
| 1885 | #695 | 10 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #480 | 16 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #447 | 14 | — | |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Deborah was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1887, when fewer than 16 girls a year got the name.
See more about Deborah
- 10 spots since 2024 (#852 → #862)
- 42 spots since 2020 (#904 → #862)
- 58 spots since 2015 (#804 → #862)
- Biggest jump: 278 spots in 1900 (#983 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 271 spots in 1889 (#486 → #757)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1955 at #2 (52,318 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: 13 yrs · run 1950–1962
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1947–1976
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 36 girls born in 1954 were named Deborah (2.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,135 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #2 in 1955, was only 1 in 37 (2.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 58.0% of all girls named Deborah (430,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 143 | #447 (1881) | #573 |
| 1890s | 183 | #538 (1890) | #722 |
| 1900s | 226 | #699 (1901) | #761 |
| 1910s | 651 | #644 (1915) | #757 |
| 1920s | 1,070 | #534 (1929) | #716 |
| 1930s | 2,808 | #293 (1939) | #400 |
| 1940s | 44,054 | #15 (1949) | #161 |
| 1950s | 430,537 | #2 (1955) | #5 |
| 1960s | 183,439 | #9 (1962) | #16 |
| 1970s | 47,855 | #33 (1970) | #77 |
| 1980s | 14,783 | #146 (1980) | #193 |
| 1990s | 7,574 | #262 (1990) | #370 |
| 2000s | 4,284 | #493 (2000) | #659 |
| 2010s | 3,429 | #752 (2014) | #802 |
| 2020s | 1,784 | #852 (2024) | #901 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deborah in 1957
Top girls' names in 1957
Top boys' names in 1957
More about 1957
girls
2,044,851 girls got a published name in 1957; 1 in 51 of them was named Deborah, which outranked 99.9% of the 7,015 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,157,236 boys got a published name in 1957; 1 in 25,681 of them was named Deborah, which outranked 81.9% of the 4,552 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).