Deanne
Last seen for girls in 2021 at #13,464 · Last seen for boys in 1970 at #4,724
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1968 · 584 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,851since 1919
Deanne over time
Rank among girls' names. Deanne has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | — | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | — | |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | — | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | — | |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | — | |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | — | |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | — | |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | — | |
| 2003 | #5,586 | 21 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 | — | |
| 2001 | #4,688 | 25 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,738 | 34 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,445 | 25 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,648 | 32 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,036 | 39 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,149 | 37 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,623 | 47 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,079 | 66 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,967 | 71 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,275 | 58 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,818 | 78 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,755 | 83 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,523 | 94 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,446 | 95 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,531 | 83 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,119 | 130 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,109 | 130 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,144 | 119 | — | |
| 1983 | #929 | 160 | — | |
| 1982 | #962 | 154 | — | |
| 1981 | #866 | 179 | — | |
| 1980 | #866 | 177 | — | |
| 1979 | #846 | 184 | — | |
| 1978 | #909 | 157 | — | |
| 1977 | #751 | 203 | — | |
| 1976 | #750 | 193 | — | |
| 1975 | #688 | 217 | — | |
| 1974 | #593 | 267 | — | |
| 1973 | #539 | 311 | — | |
| 1972 | #484 | 368 | — | |
| 1971 | #466 | 432 | — | |
| 1970 | #392 | 597 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #390 | 584 | — | |
| 1968 | #377 | 584 | — | |
| 1967 | #386 | 561 | — | |
| 1966 | #398 | 529 | — | |
| 1965 | #385 | 575 | — | |
| 1964 | #407 | 574 | — | |
| 1963 | #423 | 525 | — | |
| 1962 | #383 | 599 | — | |
| 1961 | #432 | 516 | — | |
| 1960 | #472 | 428 | — | |
| 1959 | #533 | 330 | — | |
| 1958 | #587 | 286 | — | |
| 1957 | #629 | 240 | — | |
| 1956 | #645 | 218 | — | |
| 1955 | #667 | 196 | — | |
| 1954 | #631 | 209 | — | |
| 1953 | #772 | 141 | — | |
| 1952 | #715 | 155 | — | |
| 1951 | #712 | 150 | — | |
| 1950 | #699 | 151 | — | |
| 1949 | #729 | 135 | — | |
| 1948 | #730 | 134 | — | |
| 1947 | #687 | 150 | — | |
| 1946 | #675 | 140 | — | |
| 1945 | #593 | 151 | — | |
| 1944 | #625 | 136 | — | |
| 1943 | #581 | 168 | — | |
| 1942 | #568 | 169 | — | |
| 1941 | #598 | 139 | — | |
| 1940 | #513 | 183 | — | |
| 1939 | #514 | 169 | — | |
| 1938 | #444 | 231 | — | |
| 1937 | #426 | 230 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,593 | 22 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,289 | 13 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,235 | 14 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,972 | 9 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | — | |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | — | |
| 1924 | #3,665 | 8 | — | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | #3,655 | 8 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | — | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Deanne! It came in at #4,251, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1920–1921, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Deanne
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2021
- Biggest jump: 1,167 spots in 1937 (#1,593 → #426)
- Biggest drop: 215 spots in 1984 (#929 → #1,144)
- Debuted 1919
- Peaked 1968 at #377 (584 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 47 yrs · run 1937–1983
- Highest: 1 in 2,809 girls born in 1968 were named Deanne (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 273,477 girls born in 2021 (0.00%)
- 36.9% of all girls named Deanne (5,475) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 6 | #4,251 (1919) | #4,251 |
| 1920s | 42 | #3,137 (1929) | #4,004 |
| 1930s | 724 | #426 (1937) | #1,823 |
| 1940s | 1,505 | #513 (1940) | #630 |
| 1950s | 2,076 | #533 (1959) | #659 |
| 1960s | 5,475 | #377 (1968) | #405 |
| 1970s | 2,929 | #392 (1970) | #642 |
| 1980s | 1,321 | #866 (1981) | #1,150 |
| 1990s | 536 | #1,755 (1990) | #2,680 |
| 2000s | 169 | #3,738 (2000) | #7,623 |
| 2010s | 62 | #7,804 (2012) | #12,948 |
| 2020s | 6 | #13,464 (2021) | #13,464 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deanne in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 10,996 of them was named Deanne, which outranked 92.2% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).