Deanna

#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1969 · 4,068 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
3 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
134,477
since 1899

Deanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202013peak #88, 1969girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,17385—
2024#2,30380—
2023#2,05095—
2022#2,00697—
2021#1,910103—
2020#1,769112—
2019#1,668126—
2018#1,488147—
2017#1,400164—
2016#1,286187—
2015#1,193210—
2014#1,092233—
2013#915279—
2012#917281—
2011#817325—
2010#712396—
2009#604499—
2008#594525—
2007#549557—
2006#529573—
2005#478639—
2004#451674#11,3565
2003#421714—
2002#348855—
2001#353842—
2000#3031,051—
1999#2771,132—
1998#2441,246—
1997#2221,344—
1996#2101,390—
1995#1871,586—
1994#1651,875—
1993#1611,938#6,8167
1992#1551,976—
1991#1581,879—
1990#1591,854#6,4157
1989#1621,757#5,6158
1988#1631,738#5,7517
1987#1701,638#4,5739
1986#1641,664#6,7215
1985#1561,817#6,5235
1984#1511,916—
1983#1491,923#4,4998
1982#1561,894#3,48212
1981#1461,940—
1980#1491,868—
1979#1451,950—
1978#1362,033#3,40011
1977#1382,093—
1976#1282,116—
1975#1262,276#3,9418
1974#1152,558#2,94612
1973#1112,796#3,01311
1972#1073,039#2,81912
1971#953,791#2,12619
1970#904,331#2,62113
1969#884,068#3,3148
1968#1043,414#2,9079
1967#1043,348#3,2317
1966#1053,298#2,62710
1965#1103,406—
1964#1153,575#3,2827
1963#1333,122#2,53911
1962#1383,060#2,50411
1961#1562,683—
1960#1732,295#4,0385
1959#1941,828—
1958#2201,381—
1957#2361,287—
1956#2381,207—
1955#2541,072—
1954#268980—
1953#279886—
1952#284818—
1951#256910—
1950#253891—
1949#240968—
1948#2281,063—
1947#2101,263—
1946#1931,276—
1945#1751,187—
1944#1671,304#3,1096
1943#1601,573—
1942#1601,447—
1941#1371,856#2,8727
1940#1361,802#2,8717
1939#1331,805#3,1136
1938#1152,254#3,1756
1937#1391,624#2,9057
1936#76877—
1935#1,35629—
1934#2,08715—
1933#2,27513—
1932#3,9016—
1931#2,75010—
1930#3,6587—
1929#2,73711—
1928#3,4368—
1927#2,25616—
1926#2,25716—
1925#3,11610—
1924#1,99220—
1923#2,02119—
1922#2,18617—
1921#5,0995—
1920#4,9755—
1919#3,4528—
1918#4,8095—
1917——
1916#4,4175—
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910#1,9357—
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899#1,5965—
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1899

The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Deanna is popular in 2013

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNHWashington: #905 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,970 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMNIllinois: #790 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 4,458 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWIMichigan: #975 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,948 girlsMINew York: #741 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,968 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedORNevada: #507 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,108 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIAIndiana: #798 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,262 girlsINOhio: #661 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 3,757 girlsOHPennsylvania: #787 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,734 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,093 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 7,327 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,145 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,257 girlsVAMaryland: #598 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,940 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDEArizona: #1,110 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,145 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedARTennessee: #803 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,248 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #848 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,922 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMSAlabama: #592 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,668 girlsALGeorgia: #552 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,738 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedHITexas: #996 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 6,191 girlsTXFlorida: #645 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,529 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Nevada#507 · 1 in 2,108
  2. Georgia#552 · 1 in 2,738
  3. Alabama#592 · 1 in 2,668
  4. Maryland#598 · 1 in 2,940
  5. Florida#645 · 1 in 3,529

Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Nevada#50751 in 2,108
Georgia#552171 in 2,738
Alabama#59271 in 2,668
Maryland#59881 in 2,940
Florida#645231 in 3,529
Ohio#661141 in 3,757
New York#741231 in 3,968
Pennsylvania#787111 in 4,734
Illinois#790131 in 4,458
Indiana#79871 in 4,262
Tennessee#80371 in 4,248
North Carolina#84891 in 4,922
Washington#90561 in 4,970
Michigan#97571 in 5,948
Texas#996261 in 6,191
California#1,093281 in 7,327
Arizona#1,11051 in 6,145
Virginia#1,14551 in 7,257
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Deanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
  • 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
  • 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
  • Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
  • Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
Rise & fade · girls
70 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1899
  • Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
  • Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
  • Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
Share of babies · girls
1 in 404
  • Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
  • Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s5#1,596 (1899)#1,596
1900s0——
1910s30#1,935 (1910)#3,777
1920s127#1,992 (1924)#3,008
1930s5,840#115 (1938)#1,718
1940s13,739#136 (1940)#181
1950s11,260#194 (1959)#248
1960s32,269#88 (1969)#123
1970s26,983#90 (1970)#119
1980s18,155#146 (1981)#157
1990s16,220#155 (1992)#194
2000s6,929#303 (2000)#463
2010s2,348#712 (2010)#1,149
2020s572#1,769 (2020)#2,035

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Deanna in 2013

girls
#915
279 births · 1 in 6,289 girls

Top girls' names in 2013

  1. #1Sophia21,255
  2. #2Emma20,973
  3. #3Olivia18,454
  4. #4Isabella17,689
  5. #5Ava15,271
  6. #6Mia13,166
  7. #7Emily13,144
  8. #8Abigail12,429
  9. #9Madison10,605
  10. #10Elizabeth9,476
  11. #915Deanna279
More about 2013

girls

1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 6,289 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 95.3% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Deanna
  1. #912Ann280
  2. #912Campbell280
  3. #912Lilia280
  4. #915Deanna279
  5. #915Azaria279
  6. #917Shannon278
  7. #918Destinee277
  8. #918Jolene277

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2012
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,124Daleyza#3,711 → #587
  2. ↑ 736Marjorie#1,646 → #910
  3. ↑ 683Lennon#1,612 → #929
  4. ↑ 561Jurnee#1,457 → #896
  5. ↑ 539Everleigh#1,405 → #866
Fallers
  1. ↓ 827Litzy#598 → #1,425
  2. ↓ 409Geraldine#994 → #1,403
  3. ↓ 384Taraji#858 → #1,242
  4. ↓ 374Marisa#977 → #1,351
  5. ↓ 372Adley#733 → #1,105

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2013 →