Deanna
#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1969 · 4,068 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 134,477since 1899
Deanna over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,173 | 85 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,303 | 80 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,006 | 97 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,910 | 103 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,769 | 112 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,668 | 126 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,488 | 147 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,400 | 164 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,286 | 187 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,193 | 210 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,092 | 233 | — | |
| 2013 | #915 | 279 | — | |
| 2012 | #917 | 281 | — | |
| 2011 | #817 | 325 | — | |
| 2010 | #712 | 396 | — | |
| 2009 | #604 | 499 | — | |
| 2008 | #594 | 525 | — | |
| 2007 | #549 | 557 | — | |
| 2006 | #529 | 573 | — | |
| 2005 | #478 | 639 | — | |
| 2004 | #451 | 674 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #421 | 714 | — | |
| 2002 | #348 | 855 | — | |
| 2001 | #353 | 842 | — | |
| 2000 | #303 | 1,051 | — | |
| 1999 | #277 | 1,132 | — | |
| 1998 | #244 | 1,246 | — | |
| 1997 | #222 | 1,344 | — | |
| 1996 | #210 | 1,390 | — | |
| 1995 | #187 | 1,586 | — | |
| 1994 | #165 | 1,875 | — | |
| 1993 | #161 | 1,938 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #155 | 1,976 | — | |
| 1991 | #158 | 1,879 | — | |
| 1990 | #159 | 1,854 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #162 | 1,757 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #163 | 1,738 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #170 | 1,638 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #164 | 1,664 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #156 | 1,817 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #151 | 1,916 | — | |
| 1983 | #149 | 1,923 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #156 | 1,894 | #3,482 | 12 |
| 1981 | #146 | 1,940 | — | |
| 1980 | #149 | 1,868 | — | |
| 1979 | #145 | 1,950 | — | |
| 1978 | #136 | 2,033 | #3,400 | 11 |
| 1977 | #138 | 2,093 | — | |
| 1976 | #128 | 2,116 | — | |
| 1975 | #126 | 2,276 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #115 | 2,558 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #111 | 2,796 | #3,013 | 11 |
| 1972 | #107 | 3,039 | #2,819 | 12 |
| 1971 | #95 | 3,791 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #90 | 4,331 | #2,621 | 13 |
| 1969 | #88 | 4,068 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #104 | 3,414 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #104 | 3,348 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #105 | 3,298 | #2,627 | 10 |
| 1965 | #110 | 3,406 | — | |
| 1964 | #115 | 3,575 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #133 | 3,122 | #2,539 | 11 |
| 1962 | #138 | 3,060 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #156 | 2,683 | — | |
| 1960 | #173 | 2,295 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #194 | 1,828 | — | |
| 1958 | #220 | 1,381 | — | |
| 1957 | #236 | 1,287 | — | |
| 1956 | #238 | 1,207 | — | |
| 1955 | #254 | 1,072 | — | |
| 1954 | #268 | 980 | — | |
| 1953 | #279 | 886 | — | |
| 1952 | #284 | 818 | — | |
| 1951 | #256 | 910 | — | |
| 1950 | #253 | 891 | — | |
| 1949 | #240 | 968 | — | |
| 1948 | #228 | 1,063 | — | |
| 1947 | #210 | 1,263 | — | |
| 1946 | #193 | 1,276 | — | |
| 1945 | #175 | 1,187 | — | |
| 1944 | #167 | 1,304 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #160 | 1,573 | — | |
| 1942 | #160 | 1,447 | — | |
| 1941 | #137 | 1,856 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #136 | 1,802 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #133 | 1,805 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #115 | 2,254 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #139 | 1,624 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #768 | 77 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,356 | 29 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,275 | 13 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,436 | 8 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,256 | 16 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,021 | 19 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,186 | 17 | — | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | — | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | — | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1899
The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Deanna is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Mississippi#80 · 1 in 390
- New Mexico#86 · 1 in 357
- New Jersey#97 · 1 in 438
- Connecticut#104 · 1 in 436
- New York#113 · 1 in 553
Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #80 | 33 | 1 in 390 |
| New Mexico | #86 | 26 | 1 in 357 |
| New Jersey | #97 | 104 | 1 in 438 |
| Connecticut | #104 | 41 | 1 in 436 |
| New York | #113 | 210 | 1 in 553 |
| Massachusetts | #120 | 65 | 1 in 552 |
| Pennsylvania | #120 | 109 | 1 in 628 |
| Michigan | #127 | 89 | 1 in 641 |
| North Carolina | #127 | 62 | 1 in 643 |
| Vermont | #129 | 5 | 1 in 477 |
| New Hampshire | #130 | 10 | 1 in 585 |
| Alabama | #133 | 34 | 1 in 629 |
| Florida | #138 | 102 | 1 in 736 |
| South Carolina | #144 | 26 | 1 in 726 |
| Illinois | #145 | 105 | 1 in 717 |
| Maine | #145 | 10 | 1 in 572 |
| Rhode Island | #145 | 8 | 1 in 653 |
| Kentucky | #146 | 28 | 1 in 749 |
| Tennessee | #155 | 38 | 1 in 783 |
| District of Columbia | #157 | 9 | 1 in 585 |
| Maryland | #163 | 32 | 1 in 840 |
| Missouri | #165 | 35 | 1 in 883 |
| Georgia | #166 | 48 | 1 in 860 |
| Nevada | #166 | 11 | 1 in 661 |
| Wisconsin | #166 | 29 | 1 in 955 |
| West Virginia | #168 | 10 | 1 in 836 |
| Virginia | #172 | 41 | 1 in 890 |
| Arizona | #173 | 33 | 1 in 794 |
| Ohio | #180 | 67 | 1 in 1,014 |
| Arkansas | #184 | 13 | 1 in 912 |
| Nebraska | #187 | 9 | 1 in 944 |
| California | #196 | 249 | 1 in 1,031 |
| Colorado | #196 | 21 | 1 in 1,006 |
| Oklahoma | #197 | 17 | 1 in 1,011 |
| Louisiana | #199 | 23 | 1 in 1,030 |
| Kansas | #200 | 13 | 1 in 1,026 |
| Indiana | #205 | 29 | 1 in 1,146 |
| Hawaii | #211 | 6 | 1 in 800 |
| Texas | #250 | 100 | 1 in 1,376 |
| Washington | #265 | 21 | 1 in 1,466 |
| Minnesota | #267 | 15 | 1 in 1,758 |
| Oregon | #291 | 10 | 1 in 1,626 |
| Iowa | #417 | 5 | 1 in 3,055 |
| Utah | #417 | 6 | 1 in 2,301 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
- 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
- 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
- Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
Rise & fade · girls
70 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
- Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
Share of babies · girls
1 in 404
- Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,596 (1899) | #1,596 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 30 | #1,935 (1910) | #3,777 |
| 1920s | 127 | #1,992 (1924) | #3,008 |
| 1930s | 5,840 | #115 (1938) | #1,718 |
| 1940s | 13,739 | #136 (1940) | #181 |
| 1950s | 11,260 | #194 (1959) | #248 |
| 1960s | 32,269 | #88 (1969) | #123 |
| 1970s | 26,983 | #90 (1970) | #119 |
| 1980s | 18,155 | #146 (1981) | #157 |
| 1990s | 16,220 | #155 (1992) | #194 |
| 2000s | 6,929 | #303 (2000) | #463 |
| 2010s | 2,348 | #712 (2010) | #1,149 |
| 2020s | 572 | #1,769 (2020) | #2,035 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deanna in 1992
girls
#155
1,976 births · 1 in 933 girls
Top girls' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 933 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 99.0% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Deanna
Biggest movers since 1991
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.