Deanna
#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1969 · 4,068 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 134,477since 1899
Deanna over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,173 | 85 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,303 | 80 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,006 | 97 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,910 | 103 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,769 | 112 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,668 | 126 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,488 | 147 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,400 | 164 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,286 | 187 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,193 | 210 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,092 | 233 | — | |
| 2013 | #915 | 279 | — | |
| 2012 | #917 | 281 | — | |
| 2011 | #817 | 325 | — | |
| 2010 | #712 | 396 | — | |
| 2009 | #604 | 499 | — | |
| 2008 | #594 | 525 | — | |
| 2007 | #549 | 557 | — | |
| 2006 | #529 | 573 | — | |
| 2005 | #478 | 639 | — | |
| 2004 | #451 | 674 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #421 | 714 | — | |
| 2002 | #348 | 855 | — | |
| 2001 | #353 | 842 | — | |
| 2000 | #303 | 1,051 | — | |
| 1999 | #277 | 1,132 | — | |
| 1998 | #244 | 1,246 | — | |
| 1997 | #222 | 1,344 | — | |
| 1996 | #210 | 1,390 | — | |
| 1995 | #187 | 1,586 | — | |
| 1994 | #165 | 1,875 | — | |
| 1993 | #161 | 1,938 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #155 | 1,976 | — | |
| 1991 | #158 | 1,879 | — | |
| 1990 | #159 | 1,854 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #162 | 1,757 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #163 | 1,738 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #170 | 1,638 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #164 | 1,664 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #156 | 1,817 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #151 | 1,916 | — | |
| 1983 | #149 | 1,923 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #156 | 1,894 | #3,482 | 12 |
| 1981 | #146 | 1,940 | — | |
| 1980 | #149 | 1,868 | — | |
| 1979 | #145 | 1,950 | — | |
| 1978 | #136 | 2,033 | #3,400 | 11 |
| 1977 | #138 | 2,093 | — | |
| 1976 | #128 | 2,116 | — | |
| 1975 | #126 | 2,276 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #115 | 2,558 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #111 | 2,796 | #3,013 | 11 |
| 1972 | #107 | 3,039 | #2,819 | 12 |
| 1971 | #95 | 3,791 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #90 | 4,331 | #2,621 | 13 |
| 1969 | #88 | 4,068 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #104 | 3,414 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #104 | 3,348 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #105 | 3,298 | #2,627 | 10 |
| 1965 | #110 | 3,406 | — | |
| 1964 | #115 | 3,575 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #133 | 3,122 | #2,539 | 11 |
| 1962 | #138 | 3,060 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #156 | 2,683 | — | |
| 1960 | #173 | 2,295 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #194 | 1,828 | — | |
| 1958 | #220 | 1,381 | — | |
| 1957 | #236 | 1,287 | — | |
| 1956 | #238 | 1,207 | — | |
| 1955 | #254 | 1,072 | — | |
| 1954 | #268 | 980 | — | |
| 1953 | #279 | 886 | — | |
| 1952 | #284 | 818 | — | |
| 1951 | #256 | 910 | — | |
| 1950 | #253 | 891 | — | |
| 1949 | #240 | 968 | — | |
| 1948 | #228 | 1,063 | — | |
| 1947 | #210 | 1,263 | — | |
| 1946 | #193 | 1,276 | — | |
| 1945 | #175 | 1,187 | — | |
| 1944 | #167 | 1,304 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #160 | 1,573 | — | |
| 1942 | #160 | 1,447 | — | |
| 1941 | #137 | 1,856 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #136 | 1,802 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #133 | 1,805 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #115 | 2,254 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #139 | 1,624 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #768 | 77 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,356 | 29 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,275 | 13 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,436 | 8 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,256 | 16 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,021 | 19 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,186 | 17 | — | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | — | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | — | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1899
The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Deanna is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Kansas#83 · 1 in 383
- Nebraska#92 · 1 in 433
- Idaho#95 · 1 in 366
- South Dakota#107 · 1 in 445
- Iowa#118 · 1 in 589
Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas | #83 | 51 | 1 in 383 |
| Nebraska | #92 | 33 | 1 in 433 |
| Idaho | #95 | 17 | 1 in 366 |
| South Dakota | #107 | 17 | 1 in 445 |
| Iowa | #118 | 50 | 1 in 589 |
| Oregon | #119 | 29 | 1 in 543 |
| Oklahoma | #132 | 29 | 1 in 744 |
| Montana | #144 | 9 | 1 in 678 |
| Colorado | #152 | 21 | 1 in 743 |
| New Hampshire | #155 | 6 | 1 in 845 |
| Minnesota | #156 | 35 | 1 in 1,020 |
| North Dakota | #161 | 8 | 1 in 870 |
| West Virginia | #173 | 20 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Wisconsin | #177 | 28 | 1 in 1,404 |
| Arizona | #185 | 12 | 1 in 815 |
| Indiana | #195 | 33 | 1 in 1,374 |
| Missouri | #215 | 24 | 1 in 1,714 |
| Ohio | #217 | 49 | 1 in 1,864 |
| Michigan | #231 | 37 | 1 in 2,121 |
| Kentucky | #232 | 20 | 1 in 1,696 |
| California | #235 | 77 | 1 in 1,570 |
| Tennessee | #235 | 21 | 1 in 1,806 |
| Illinois | #240 | 46 | 1 in 1,997 |
| Washington | #241 | 15 | 1 in 1,720 |
| Arkansas | #245 | 13 | 1 in 1,586 |
| Utah | #262 | 6 | 1 in 1,539 |
| New Mexico | #268 | 6 | 1 in 1,593 |
| Texas | #307 | 49 | 1 in 2,081 |
| Maryland | #314 | 8 | 1 in 3,088 |
| Louisiana | #330 | 15 | 1 in 2,362 |
| New Jersey | #330 | 11 | 1 in 4,213 |
| Pennsylvania | #351 | 24 | 1 in 4,520 |
| Florida | #364 | 10 | 1 in 3,085 |
| New York | #400 | 34 | 1 in 4,403 |
| Massachusetts | #418 | 5 | 1 in 9,271 |
| North Carolina | #514 | 7 | 1 in 7,220 |
| Georgia | #573 | 5 | 1 in 8,583 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
- 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
- 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
- Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
Rise & fade · girls
70 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
- Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
Share of babies · girls
1 in 404
- Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,596 (1899) | #1,596 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 30 | #1,935 (1910) | #3,777 |
| 1920s | 127 | #1,992 (1924) | #3,008 |
| 1930s | 5,840 | #115 (1938) | #1,718 |
| 1940s | 13,739 | #136 (1940) | #181 |
| 1950s | 11,260 | #194 (1959) | #248 |
| 1960s | 32,269 | #88 (1969) | #123 |
| 1970s | 26,983 | #90 (1970) | #119 |
| 1980s | 18,155 | #146 (1981) | #157 |
| 1990s | 16,220 | #155 (1992) | #194 |
| 2000s | 6,929 | #303 (2000) | #463 |
| 2010s | 2,348 | #712 (2010) | #1,149 |
| 2020s | 572 | #1,769 (2020) | #2,035 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deanna in 1951
girls
#256
910 births · 1 in 1,979 girls
Top girls' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 1,979 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 95.9% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Deanna
Biggest movers since 1950
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.