Daisy
#75 for girls in 2025, 3,206 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 648 births
- Debut · girls
- 564 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 31 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 158,723since 1880
Daisy over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #75 | 3,206 | — | |
| 2024 | #76 | 3,102 | — | |
| 2023 | #110 | 2,426 | — | |
| 2022 | #124 | 2,325 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #134 | 2,087 | — | |
| 2020 | #143 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2019 | #164 | 1,742 | — | |
| 2018 | #169 | 1,718 | — | |
| 2017 | #170 | 1,796 | — | |
| 2016 | #189 | 1,732 | — | |
| 2015 | #183 | 1,772 | — | |
| 2014 | #180 | 1,791 | — | |
| 2013 | #198 | 1,633 | — | |
| 2012 | #174 | 1,784 | — | |
| 2011 | #167 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2010 | #151 | 2,020 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #153 | 2,074 | — | |
| 2008 | #161 | 2,075 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #167 | 2,159 | — | |
| 2006 | #149 | 2,300 | — | |
| 2005 | #150 | 2,323 | — | |
| 2004 | #144 | 2,271 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #136 | 2,410 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #138 | 2,456 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #139 | 2,371 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #141 | 2,368 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #133 | 2,470 | — | |
| 1998 | #136 | 2,449 | — | |
| 1997 | #140 | 2,303 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #124 | 2,514 | #4,613 | 13 |
| 1995 | #145 | 2,224 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #177 | 1,668 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #185 | 1,579 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #187 | 1,654 | #2,747 | 25 |
| 1991 | #185 | 1,609 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | #193 | 1,521 | #3,607 | 16 |
| 1989 | #218 | 1,256 | #3,446 | 16 |
| 1988 | #225 | 1,166 | #2,367 | 25 |
| 1987 | #312 | 774 | #2,559 | 21 |
| 1986 | #305 | 801 | #2,601 | 20 |
| 1985 | #261 | 958 | #2,942 | 16 |
| 1984 | #225 | 1,145 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #214 | 1,175 | #2,912 | 15 |
| 1982 | #366 | 633 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #328 | 723 | #3,858 | 10 |
| 1980 | #418 | 528 | — | |
| 1979 | #519 | 371 | — | |
| 1978 | #606 | 282 | — | |
| 1977 | #554 | 316 | — | |
| 1976 | #544 | 320 | — | |
| 1975 | #529 | 328 | — | |
| 1974 | #533 | 314 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #561 | 293 | — | |
| 1972 | #628 | 247 | — | |
| 1971 | #577 | 303 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #575 | 309 | — | |
| 1969 | #569 | 298 | — | |
| 1968 | #585 | 268 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #565 | 281 | — | |
| 1966 | #529 | 317 | — | |
| 1965 | #520 | 337 | — | |
| 1964 | #507 | 374 | — | |
| 1963 | #492 | 390 | — | |
| 1962 | #488 | 395 | — | |
| 1961 | #478 | 413 | — | |
| 1960 | #453 | 465 | — | |
| 1959 | #449 | 460 | — | |
| 1958 | #400 | 531 | — | |
| 1957 | #420 | 493 | — | |
| 1956 | #407 | 493 | — | |
| 1955 | #394 | 497 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #385 | 500 | — | |
| 1953 | #362 | 550 | — | |
| 1952 | #369 | 502 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #343 | 540 | — | |
| 1950 | #336 | 533 | — | |
| 1949 | #321 | 580 | — | |
| 1948 | #302 | 646 | — | |
| 1947 | #304 | 678 | — | |
| 1946 | #307 | 579 | — | |
| 1945 | #271 | 636 | — | |
| 1944 | #242 | 741 | — | |
| 1943 | #255 | 760 | — | |
| 1942 | #240 | 799 | — | |
| 1941 | #233 | 741 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #218 | 774 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #210 | 822 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #216 | 786 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #204 | 812 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #212 | 777 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #194 | 903 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #187 | 939 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #197 | 873 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1932 | #176 | 1,078 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #178 | 1,009 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #181 | 1,064 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #182 | 1,080 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #169 | 1,245 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #172 | 1,242 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #171 | 1,288 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #169 | 1,400 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #166 | 1,460 | #2,473 | 12 |
| 1923 | #163 | 1,443 | — | |
| 1922 | #157 | 1,530 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #160 | 1,481 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #155 | 1,489 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1919 | #148 | 1,496 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #149 | 1,525 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #150 | 1,417 | #3,545 | 6 |
| 1916 | #137 | 1,511 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #131 | 1,518 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #126 | 1,202 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #123 | 1,052 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #112 | 1,044 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | #108 | 833 | — | |
| 1910 | #101 | 877 | #1,421 | 6 |
| 1909 | #102 | 754 | — | |
| 1908 | #99 | 765 | — | |
| 1907 | #98 | 739 | — | |
| 1906 | #90 | 773 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #87 | 776 | — | |
| 1904 | #85 | 772 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #82 | 776 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #85 | 748 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #87 | 653 | — | |
| 1900 | #81 | 931 | — | |
| 1899 | #85 | 660 | — | |
| 1898 | #84 | 712 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #86 | 624 | — | |
| 1896 | #83 | 661 | — | |
| 1895 | #84 | 665 | #1,079 | 5 |
| 1894 | #81 | 645 | — | |
| 1893 | #84 | 573 | #907 | 6 |
| 1892 | #85 | 564 | — | |
| 1891 | #79 | 557 | — | |
| 1890 | #76 | 588 | — | |
| 1889 | #73 | 583 | — | |
| 1888 | #73 | 612 | #755 | 8 |
| 1887 | #67 | 532 | — | |
| 1886 | #63 | 602 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #60 | 607 | — | |
| 1884 | #54 | 685 | — | |
| 1883 | #50 | 659 | #892 | 5 |
| 1882 | #48 | 648 | — | |
| 1881 | #49 | 562 | — | |
| 1880 | #48 | 564 | #909 | 5 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Daisy was already there! It came in at #48, and was given to 564 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1978, when fewer than 340 girls a year got the name.
See more about Daisy
- 1 spot since 2024 (#76 → #75)
- 68 spots since 2020 (#143 → #75)
- 108 spots since 2015 (#183 → #75)
- Biggest jump: 152 spots in 1983 (#366 → #214)
- Biggest drop: 52 spots in 1978 (#554 → #606)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #48 (648 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 84 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1880–1908
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 161 girls born in 1880 were named Daisy (0.62%)
- Latest: 1 in 501 girls born in 2025 (0.20%)
- Its best rank, #48 in 1882, was only 1 in 166 (0.60%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 14.4% of all girls named Daisy (22,807) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #48 (1882) → #628 (1972) → #75 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6,054 | #48 (1882) | #59 |
| 1890s | 6,249 | #76 (1890) | #83 |
| 1900s | 7,687 | #81 (1900) | #90 |
| 1910s | 12,475 | #101 (1910) | #129 |
| 1920s | 13,658 | #155 (1920) | #166 |
| 1930s | 9,063 | #176 (1932) | #196 |
| 1940s | 6,934 | #218 (1940) | #269 |
| 1950s | 5,099 | #336 (1950) | #387 |
| 1960s | 3,538 | #453 (1960) | #519 |
| 1970s | 3,083 | #519 (1979) | #563 |
| 1980s | 9,159 | #214 (1983) | #287 |
| 1990s | 19,991 | #124 (1996) | #161 |
| 2000s | 22,807 | #136 (2003) | #148 |
| 2010s | 17,884 | #151 (2010) | #175 |
| 2020s | 15,042 | #75 (2025) | #110 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Daisy in 1910
Top girls' names in 1910
Top boys' names in 1910
More about 1910
girls
396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 452 of them was named Daisy, which outranked 96.4% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
194,208 boys got a published name in 1910; 1 in 32,368 of them was named Daisy, which outranked 22.7% of the 1,839 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,314Young7
- #1,314Zeb7
- #1,314Zollie7
- #1,421Daisy6
- #1,421Adell6
- #1,421Afton6
- #1,421Agustin6
- #1,589Adelard5
- #1,589Aime5
- #1,589Albino5
Tied with 167 names at #1,421; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.