Curtis
Last seen for girls in 2000 at #15,031 · #984 for boys in 2025, 232 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1963 · 5,376 births
- Debut · boys
- 68 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 46 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 260,554since 1880
Curtis over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #984 | 232 | |
| 2024 | — | #930 | 249 | |
| 2023 | — | #905 | 257 | |
| 2022 | — | #820 | 302 | |
| 2021 | — | #780 | 317 | |
| 2020 | — | #702 | 361 | |
| 2019 | — | #669 | 393 | |
| 2018 | — | #615 | 438 | |
| 2017 | — | #612 | 431 | |
| 2016 | — | #563 | 508 | |
| 2015 | — | #527 | 542 | |
| 2014 | — | #530 | 525 | |
| 2013 | — | #474 | 585 | |
| 2012 | — | #442 | 625 | |
| 2011 | — | #437 | 624 | |
| 2010 | — | #424 | 652 | |
| 2009 | — | #391 | 767 | |
| 2008 | — | #380 | 809 | |
| 2007 | — | #335 | 953 | |
| 2006 | — | #339 | 916 | |
| 2005 | — | #327 | 960 | |
| 2004 | — | #322 | 950 | |
| 2003 | — | #326 | 907 | |
| 2002 | — | #291 | 1,024 | |
| 2001 | — | #273 | 1,124 | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #265 | 1,240 |
| 1999 | — | #249 | 1,270 | |
| 1998 | — | #226 | 1,408 | |
| 1997 | — | #208 | 1,496 | |
| 1996 | — | #191 | 1,645 | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #183 | 1,709 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #170 | 1,869 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #153 | 2,097 |
| 1992 | — | #142 | 2,321 | |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #126 | 2,590 |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | #121 | 2,800 |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | #111 | 2,965 |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | #105 | 2,907 |
| 1987 | #3,031 | 31 | #100 | 2,909 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | #100 | 2,910 |
| 1985 | #3,246 | 27 | #98 | 2,943 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | #96 | 2,959 |
| 1983 | #3,151 | 26 | #100 | 2,847 |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | #101 | 2,940 |
| 1981 | #3,066 | 28 | #94 | 3,198 |
| 1980 | #3,215 | 26 | #89 | 3,332 |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | #91 | 3,200 |
| 1978 | #2,942 | 27 | #96 | 2,825 |
| 1977 | #2,666 | 31 | #100 | 2,605 |
| 1976 | #3,287 | 21 | #105 | 2,451 |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | #113 | 2,327 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #98 | 2,589 |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 | #98 | 2,690 |
| 1972 | #2,356 | 31 | #92 | 3,080 |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | #88 | 3,426 |
| 1970 | #2,522 | 29 | #88 | 3,615 |
| 1969 | #2,396 | 29 | #81 | 3,675 |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | #75 | 3,855 |
| 1967 | #2,432 | 25 | #77 | 3,966 |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | #75 | 4,242 |
| 1965 | #1,829 | 39 | #75 | 4,687 |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | #75 | 5,064 |
| 1963 | #2,172 | 30 | #72 | 5,376 |
| 1962 | #2,031 | 33 | #73 | 5,569 |
| 1961 | #1,838 | 39 | #75 | 5,447 |
| 1960 | #1,747 | 42 | #79 | 5,363 |
| 1959 | #2,021 | 31 | #75 | 5,536 |
| 1958 | #1,630 | 43 | #82 | 5,261 |
| 1957 | #1,474 | 52 | #80 | 5,342 |
| 1956 | #1,871 | 33 | #80 | 5,157 |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 | #79 | 4,981 |
| 1954 | #1,769 | 34 | #84 | 4,594 |
| 1953 | #2,017 | 26 | #86 | 4,353 |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | #86 | 4,175 |
| 1951 | #1,772 | 30 | #91 | 3,716 |
| 1950 | #2,121 | 21 | #97 | 3,209 |
| 1949 | #1,666 | 32 | #97 | 3,088 |
| 1948 | #2,070 | 22 | #101 | 3,091 |
| 1947 | #1,863 | 27 | #99 | 3,037 |
| 1946 | #2,094 | 20 | #99 | 2,723 |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 | #97 | 2,393 |
| 1944 | #1,364 | 35 | #97 | 2,465 |
| 1943 | #1,492 | 31 | #100 | 2,525 |
| 1942 | #1,559 | 28 | #98 | 2,420 |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 | #100 | 2,164 |
| 1940 | #1,347 | 31 | #97 | 2,103 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | #98 | 2,012 |
| 1938 | #1,945 | 17 | #101 | 2,002 |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | #109 | 1,790 |
| 1936 | #1,413 | 27 | #107 | 1,797 |
| 1935 | #1,449 | 26 | #108 | 1,753 |
| 1934 | #1,481 | 25 | #103 | 1,844 |
| 1933 | #1,262 | 32 | #107 | 1,679 |
| 1932 | #1,293 | 32 | #103 | 1,775 |
| 1931 | #2,024 | 16 | #108 | 1,635 |
| 1930 | #1,232 | 37 | #106 | 1,721 |
| 1929 | #1,282 | 34 | #99 | 1,946 |
| 1928 | #1,239 | 38 | #101 | 1,920 |
| 1927 | #1,523 | 29 | #118 | 1,590 |
| 1926 | #1,589 | 27 | #112 | 1,626 |
| 1925 | #1,891 | 21 | #118 | 1,520 |
| 1924 | #1,301 | 38 | #117 | 1,529 |
| 1923 | #1,388 | 33 | #116 | 1,538 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | #113 | 1,547 |
| 1921 | #1,298 | 36 | #122 | 1,479 |
| 1920 | #1,439 | 31 | #120 | 1,443 |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | #120 | 1,346 |
| 1918 | #1,203 | 39 | #123 | 1,335 |
| 1917 | #1,847 | 19 | #121 | 1,243 |
| 1916 | #1,630 | 22 | #120 | 1,174 |
| 1915 | #1,523 | 23 | #128 | 1,058 |
| 1914 | #1,665 | 16 | #120 | 915 |
| 1913 | #1,405 | 17 | #119 | 676 |
| 1912 | #1,421 | 15 | #121 | 566 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #118 | 321 |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | #114 | 277 |
| 1909 | #1,369 | 10 | #114 | 244 |
| 1908 | #1,357 | 10 | #123 | 203 |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | #115 | 208 |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | #121 | 177 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | #118 | 182 |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | #139 | 144 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 | #135 | 138 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #145 | 129 |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #143 | 114 |
| 1900 | #1,231 | 10 | #147 | 144 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | #149 | 103 |
| 1898 | #1,502 | 6 | #139 | 128 |
| 1897 | — | #154 | 102 | |
| 1896 | — | #155 | 107 | |
| 1895 | — | #179 | 89 | |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #171 | 88 |
| 1893 | — | #180 | 80 | |
| 1892 | — | #188 | 83 | |
| 1891 | — | #199 | 62 | |
| 1890 | — | #164 | 86 | |
| 1889 | — | #195 | 67 | |
| 1888 | — | #169 | 89 | |
| 1887 | — | #196 | 61 | |
| 1886 | — | #189 | 72 | |
| 1885 | — | #187 | 70 | |
| 1884 | — | #186 | 73 | |
| 1883 | — | #205 | 53 | |
| 1882 | — | #188 | 70 | |
| 1881 | — | #168 | 72 | |
| 1880 | — | #186 | 68 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Curtis was already there! It came in at #186, and was given to 68 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 74 boys a year got the name.
Where Curtis is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Montana#188 · 1 in 577
- Mississippi#201 · 1 in 843
- West Virginia#284 · 1 in 1,397
- Arkansas#307 · 1 in 1,295
- Alabama#307 · 1 in 1,492
Best ever in a state: #27 in North Dakota, 1946.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana | #188 | 7 | 1 in 577 |
| Mississippi | #201 | 16 | 1 in 843 |
| West Virginia | #284 | 6 | 1 in 1,397 |
| Alabama | #307 | 15 | 1 in 1,492 |
| Arkansas | #307 | 11 | 1 in 1,295 |
| Oklahoma | #308 | 16 | 1 in 1,321 |
| Ohio | #311 | 36 | 1 in 1,658 |
| Louisiana | #319 | 16 | 1 in 1,544 |
| Kentucky | #354 | 11 | 1 in 2,019 |
| Massachusetts | #362 | 12 | 1 in 2,447 |
| Indiana | #374 | 18 | 1 in 1,981 |
| Minnesota | #374 | 14 | 1 in 2,001 |
| Michigan | #390 | 21 | 1 in 2,285 |
| Tennessee | #390 | 16 | 1 in 2,223 |
| Connecticut | #397 | 6 | 1 in 2,383 |
| Kansas | #405 | 8 | 1 in 1,950 |
| Pennsylvania | #419 | 22 | 1 in 2,716 |
| Nevada | #422 | 6 | 1 in 2,209 |
| Virginia | #431 | 16 | 1 in 2,608 |
| Missouri | #441 | 13 | 1 in 2,443 |
| Wisconsin | #458 | 10 | 1 in 2,712 |
| Florida | #460 | 32 | 1 in 2,919 |
| South Carolina | #465 | 8 | 1 in 2,652 |
| North Carolina | #469 | 17 | 1 in 2,965 |
| Washington | #492 | 13 | 1 in 2,744 |
| Maryland | #495 | 9 | 1 in 3,054 |
| Utah | #496 | 8 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Arizona | #517 | 11 | 1 in 3,345 |
| Oregon | #518 | 6 | 1 in 2,997 |
| Georgia | #541 | 16 | 1 in 3,355 |
| New Jersey | #593 | 10 | 1 in 4,153 |
| Texas | #608 | 41 | 1 in 4,396 |
| California | #627 | 45 | 1 in 5,045 |
| New York | #639 | 22 | 1 in 4,658 |
| Illinois | #656 | 14 | 1 in 4,708 |
| Colorado | #672 | 6 | 1 in 4,471 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Curtis
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 54 spots since 2024 (#930 → #984)
- 282 spots since 2020 (#702 → #984)
- 457 spots since 2015 (#527 → #984)
- Biggest jump: 31 spots in 1890 (#195 → #164)
- Biggest drop: 85 spots in 2023 (#820 → #905)
Rise & fade · boys
83 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1963 at #72 (5,376 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 46 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 46 yrs · run 1949–1974
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 371
- Highest: 1 in 371 boys born in 1962 were named Curtis (0.27%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,362 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #72 in 1963, was only 1 in 378 (0.26%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1960s
- 18.1% of all boys named Curtis (47,244) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 695 | #168 (1881) | #187 |
| 1890s | 928 | #139 (1898) | #168 |
| 1900s | 1,683 | #114 (1909) | #130 |
| 1910s | 8,911 | #114 (1910) | #120 |
| 1920s | 16,138 | #99 (1929) | #114 |
| 1930s | 18,008 | #98 (1939) | #105 |
| 1940s | 26,009 | #97 (1949) | #99 |
| 1950s | 46,324 | #75 (1959) | #84 |
| 1960s | 47,244 | #72 (1963) | #76 |
| 1970s | 28,808 | #88 (1970) | #97 |
| 1980s | 29,910 | #89 (1980) | #99 |
| 1990s | 19,205 | #121 (1990) | #177 |
| 2000s | 9,650 | #265 (2000) | #325 |
| 2010s | 5,323 | #424 (2010) | #529 |
| 2020s | 1,718 | #702 (2020) | #854 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Curtis in 2013
boys
#474
585 births · 1 in 3,233 boys
Top boys' names in 2013
More about 2013
boys
1,891,581 boys got a published name in 2013; 1 in 3,233 of them was named Curtis, which outranked 96.6% of the 14,070 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).